Abstract:A thousand-year-old oriental healing system, acupuncture has been described as an energy-based model of therapy in which a vital energy named ''ki'' travels through the body along internal channels called meridians. Fourteen meridians can be outlined on the skin surface, and 361 acupuncture points are within and run longitudinally up and down the human body. From the perspective of Asian traditional medicine, the ki obstructions in the meridians cause diseases in the body, and acupuncturists, by precisely needling the correct acupoints, can enhance the flow of ki and restore physical wellbeing (1, 2) even though the existence of the acupoints and meridians is debatable and they are not visible anatomically (3,4). It could be reasonable to illustrate the acupuncture concept by analogy with phlebotomy or intravenous infusion, as both venous blood sampling and venous infusion can only be performed successfully when a syringe or catheter is placed properly within a targeted vein. Similarly, missing a vein or an acupoint would cause an expected effect to be lost.It has been reported that acupoints are spherical in shape, with a diameter of a few millimetres, and located in the intramuscular or periosteal layers (5,6). A systematic review of pooled data from eight meta-analyses found that real acupuncture (overwhelmingly intramuscular needling into acupoint areas) is significantly superior to placebo acupuncture (epidermal needling into nonacupoint skin) for treating musculoskeletal pain (7). However, there were two differences between the real and the placebo acupuncture: deep (5-20mm) versus superficial (1-2mm) needle insertions and classic acupoint placement versus non-acupoint skin (8). Thus, the review above may be interpreted as proof of the advantages of deep needling for patients with musculoskeletal pain rather than the requirement that both deep needling and acupoints be precisely targeted in order to produce a therapeutic effect, because the placebo acupuncture was limited to epidermal penetration. Stated differently, is it possible that the acupoint specificity is not as essential as traditionally assumed? Without a well-designed placebo acupuncture, no study will be able to show any advantage for real acupuncture, or the study might show an advantage that may have been accidentally generated by an imperfectly designed sham procedure.In order to confirm the efficacy of an oral medicine, researchers need to show that real medicine outperforms the placebo medicine for patients who are convinced that the placebo is the real medicine. When swallowed, the contents of the real and placebo medicines dissolve in the stomach and are absorbed into the bloodstream; thus, it can be named "substance-based intervention" (Figure 1 A). Acupuncture treatment, on the other hand, is a "procedure-based intervention" which always consists of three components: 1) non-specific effects of practitioner-patient contact, e.g. skin preparation; 2) "tactile stimulation" from mechanical needling into soft tissues; and 3) "acupointaimed approach" as needles are inserted into the proposed acupoints. These components together can initiate complex interactions that contribute to treatment effectiveness (9). Instead, the "acupoint-aimed approach" of the aforementioned three components should be removed during the placebo acupuncture while the placebo and real needling depth should be the same (Figure 1 B).In sum of the above, the difference between real and placebo treatments can be illustrated by an equation below.Clinical trial for efficacy of acupuncture: Real acupuncture -Placebo acupuncture = AcupointA critical element to judging whether or not a placebo acupuncture treatment is valid is that maximal similarity between the real and placebo treatments should be pursued (10,11). If at all possible, the placebo acupuncture should be comparable to real acupuncture in terms of insertion depth/angle, needle manipulation, or applied electricity but without touching the targeted acupoints.In other words, the setting of the placebo acupuncture creates an exclusive window in which the acupoint is the sole explanation if the placebo and real treatments lead to distinguished outcomes, or a removal of the stimuli towards acupoints from a given procedure, the measurable clinical effects would disappear or significantly weaken.There are some different styles of acupuncture in current clinical practice. Japanese and Taiwanese acupuncturists tend to use a relatively shallow-insertion approach, while Korean and Chinese acupuncturists prefer to use deeper needling. All the acupuncture styles' needling, however, are usually placed in the muscular layer, except for acupoints located on the top of the skull or the midline of the sternum (12,13). The use of the above-mentioned placebo needling (Figure 1 B) would likely allow acupuncture trials to be done sham-controlled, patient-blind, evaluator-blind an -Abstract Truncated-

Understanding Placebo and Nocebo Responses Based on a Randomized Sham-Controlled Study on Acupuncture in Integrative Cancer Care

Placebo response varies between different types of sham acupuncture: A randomized double‐blind trial in neck pain patients

Nocebo expectations rather than placebo expectations affect topical pain relief: A randomized clinical trial

Impact of Baseline Expectancy on Outcome Prediction of Real and Sham Acupuncture for Persistent Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Pain in Solid Tumor Survivors: A Secondary Analysis of a Randomized Clinical Trial

Patients’ perceptions on non‐specific effects of acupuncture: Qualitative comparison between responders and non‐responders

Placebo Control in the Design of Acupuncture Clinical Trials

Analysis of placebo effect of acupuncture

Think out of the box: revisiting sham acupuncture treatment

Su1425: PLACEBO RESPONSE RATES IN ACUPUNCTURE THERAPY TRIALS FOR FUNCTIONAL DYSPEPSIA: A META ANALYSIS

Placebo response of sham acupuncture in patients with primary dysmenorrhea: a meta-analysis

[Progress of researches on non-specific effect of acupuncture]

A randomized phase III clinical trial of acupuncture for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in survivors of cancer.

Integrating acupuncture into cancer care

Acupuncture vs Massage for Pain in Patients Living With Advanced Cancer: The IMPACT Randomized Clinical Trial

Associations between acupuncture and uses of opioids and neuropsychiatric medication following chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy among patients with breast cancer.

Acupuncture--self-appraisal and the reward system

Association Between Acupoint Selection, Target Symptoms, and Traditional Chinese Medicine Diagnosis in Real-Time Clinical Practice in a Comprehensive Cancer Center

Acupuncture and Bronchial Asthma: a Long-Term Randomized Study of the Effects of Real Versus Sham Acupuncture Compared to Controls in Patients with Bronchial Asthma.

Acupuncture Relieved Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Patients with Breast Cancer: A Pilot Randomized Sham-Controlled Trial

P05.63. Perspectives of Breast Cancer Survivors about Participating in an Acupuncture Clinical Trial for Hot Flashes: a Qualitative Study

Expectancy Effect of Acupuncture on Cancer-Related Outcomes: A Systematic Review