Abstract:Practice of movement in virtual-reality and other artificially altered environments has been proposed as a method for rehabilitation following neurological injury and for training new skills in healthy humans. For such training to be useful, there must be transfer of learning from the artificial environment to the performance of desired skills in the natural environment. Therefore an important assumption of such methods is that practice in the altered environment engages the same learning and plasticity mechanisms that are required for skill performance in the natural environment. We test the hypothesis that transfer of learning may fail because the learning and plasticity mechanism that adapts to the altered environment is different from the learning mechanism required for improvement of motor skill. In this paper, we propose that a model that separates skill learning and environmental adaptation is necessary to explain the learning and aftereffects that are observed in virtual reality experiments. In particular, we studied the condition where practice in the altered environment should lead to correct skill performance in the original environment. Our 2-mechanism model predicts that aftereffects will still be observed when returning to the original environment, indicating a lack of skill transfer from the artificial environment to the original environment. To illustrate the model prediction, we tested 10 healthy participants on the interaction between a simple overlearned motor skill (straight hand movements to targets in different directions) and an artificially altered visuomotor environment (rotation of visual feedback of the results of movement). As predicted by the models, participants show adaptation to the altered environment and after-effects on return to the baseline environment even when practice in the altered environment should have led to correct skill performance. The presence of aftereffect under all conditions that involved changes in environment demonstrates separation of environmental adaptation and skill learning. Our results support the existence of two distinct learning modules with different adaptation properties. Therefore we suggest that adaptation to an altered environment may not be useful for training new skills.

Distinct learning, retention, and generalization patterns in de novo learning versus motor adaptation

Memories of Motor Adaptation Do Not Necessarily Decay with Behavioral Unlearning.

"Leap before you look": Conditions that suppress explicit, knowledge-based learning during visuomotor adaptation.

Direction-Specific Iterative Tuning of Motor Commands With Local Generalization During Randomized Reaching Practice Across Movement Directions

Eliminating Direction Specificity in Visuomotor Learning.

Motor adaptation does not differ when a perturbation is introduced abruptly or gradually

Two ways to learn in visuomotor adaptation

Behavioral / Cognitive Eliminating Direction Specificity in Visuomotor Learning

De Novo Sensorimotor Learning Through Reuse of Movement Components

Two different motor learning mechanisms contribute to learning reaching movements in a rotated visual environment

Imprecise perception of hand position during early motor adaptation

Structural Learning Benefits in a Visuomotor Adaptation Task Generalize to a Contralateral Effector

What deep reinforcement learning tells us about human motor learning and vice-versa

Persistent changes in motor adaptation strategies after perturbations that require exploration of novel muscle activation patterns

Visuomotor learning is dependent on direction-specific error saliency.

Visuomotor Adaptation and Sensory Recalibration in Reversed Hand Movement Task.

Durability of motor learning by observing

Reinforcement feedback impairs locomotor adaptation and retention

Performing a reaching task with one arm while adapting to a visuomotor rotation with the other can lead to complete transfer of motor learning across the arms

Taking aim at the perceptual side of motor learning: Exploring how explicit and implicit learning encode perceptual error information through depth vision