Grading and prognosis of weight loss before and after treatment with optimal cutoff values in nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Qiaowen Ou,Chunyan Cui,Xinchen Zeng,Annan Dong,Xiaoyu Wei,Mingyang Chen,Lizhi Liu,Yongyi Zhao,Haojiang Li,Weiqun Lin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nut.2020.110943

IF: 4.893

2020-10-01

Nutrition

Abstract:<h2 class="section-title u-h3 u-margin-l-top u-margin-xs-bottom">s</h2><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Objective</h3><p>Weight loss was validated as a prognostic predictor of nasopharyngeal carcinoma; however, no global unitary indicator and criteria exist for the definition of weight loss as a prognostic factor. We aimed to determine the most effective indicator for weight loss, evaluate its effect on nasopharyngeal carcinoma prognosis, and further propose a cutoff value to identify patients needed nutritional care.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Research Methods &amp; Procedures</h3><p>This retrospective cohort analysis with median follow-up of 62.3 months included 681 newly diagnosed patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Principal component analysis was performed to select the best continuous variable including weight loss (kg) (value of weight loss [VWL]), percent weight loss (PWL), and body mass index loss (BMIL). Multivariable Cox regression analysis and multiple correspondence analysis were performed to select the best cutoff values by different cutoff methods including the median, receiver operating characteristic curve, and threshold searching.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Results</h3><p>PWL was the highest contributor to nasopharyngeal carcinoma prognosis compared to VWL and BMIL. Cutoff values of PWL (6.3% and 12.3%) were confirmed to be more important and was proposed to differentiate patients into low-, medium-, and high-risk nasopharyngeal carcinoma groups, with their 5-year progression-free survival (84.5% vs. 77.9%, P=0.046; 77.9% vs. 67.3%, P=0.046). PWL was an independent adverse prognostic factor (P=0.002) for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.</p><h3 class="u-h4 u-margin-m-top u-margin-xs-bottom">Conclusions</h3><p>PWL is a promising predictor for nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and cutoff values could be validated for nutritional risk grading in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma. These stratified criteria may help accelerate the extensive application of grading nutritional management in nasopharyngeal carcinoma therapy.</p>

nutrition & dietetics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: In nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, the relationship between body weight change (especially weight loss) and disease prognosis has not been fully studied and standardized. Specifically, the study aims to determine the most effective body weight change indicator, evaluate its impact on the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and propose a cut - off value to identify patients in need of nutritional intervention. Through these objectives, the study hopes to fill the knowledge gap regarding the relationship between body weight change and the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma and provide specific guidance for clinical practice.

### Research Background
- **Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma**: Nasopharyngeal carcinoma is a head - and - neck cancer originating from epithelial cells in the nasopharynx, mainly prevalent in southern China, Southeast Asia, and North Africa.
- **Treatment Methods**: The main treatment methods include radiotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy, but these treatment methods may cause severe toxic side effects and affect the prognosis of patients.
- **Body Weight Change**: Weight loss is one of the most common and obvious malnutrition characteristics in patients with malignant tumors, with a wide - ranging impact, ranging from 20% to 80%, especially in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients, this proportion can reach 60%. Weight loss not only increases chemotherapy toxicity but may also lead to treatment interruption and is associated with poorer treatment outcomes.

### Research Objectives
1. **Determine the Most Effective Body Weight Change Indicator**: By analyzing body weight change (kg), percentage of body weight change (PWL), and body mass index change (BMIL), determine which indicator can best predict the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
2. **Evaluate the Impact of Body Weight Change on the Progression - Free Survival (PFS) of Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma**: Through multivariate analysis, quantify the impact of body weight change on the prognosis of patients.
3. **Propose a Cut - off Value to Identify Patients in Need of Nutritional Intervention**: Through different methods (such as median, receiver operating characteristic curve, threshold search), determine the cut - off value of percentage of body weight change (PWL) and divide patients into low - risk, medium - risk, and high - risk groups.

### Research Methods
- **Patient Selection**: Retrospective analysis of data from 681 newly diagnosed nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients between January 2010 and January 2013.
- **Body Weight Measurement**: Record the body weight changes of patients before and after treatment, and calculate body weight change (kg), percentage of body weight change (PWL), and body mass index change (BMIL).
- **Statistical Analysis**: Use methods such as principal component analysis (PCA), multiple correspondence analysis (MCA), and Cox proportional - hazards regression analysis to determine the most effective body weight change indicator and its cut - off value.

### Main Findings
- **PWL Is the Most Effective Indicator**: Through PCA analysis, PWL was determined to be the indicator with the greatest impact on the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma.
- **Determination of Cut - off Values**: Through the threshold search method, two cut - off values of PWL were determined to be 6.3% and 13.2% respectively, dividing patients into low - risk, medium - risk, and high - risk groups.
- **Significant Prognosis Differences**: The 5 - year progression - free survival rate in the low - risk group (PWL < 6.3%) was 84.5%, in the medium - risk group (6.3% ≤ PWL < 13.2%) was 77.9%, and in the high - risk group (PWL ≥ 13.2%) was 67.3%.

### Conclusions
- **PWL Is a Promising Prognosis Prediction Indicator**: PWL can not only be an independent adverse factor for the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma but can also be used to identify patients in need of nutritional intervention.
- **Application of Cut - off Values**: The proposed cut - off values can help clinicians better stratify the management of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients and improve the effectiveness of nutritional intervention.

Through these research results, the authors hope to provide a scientific basis for the assessment of body weight change and nutritional intervention in clinical practice, thereby improving the prognosis of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients.