Habitual virtuous action and acting for reasons

Lieke Joske Franci Asma
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09515089.2022.2045008
2022-02-23
Philosophical Psychology
Abstract:How can agents act virtuously out of habit? Virtuous actions are done for the right reasons, and acting for (right) reasons seems to involve deliberation. Yet, deliberation is absent if an agent’s action is habitual. That implies that the relationship between reasons and actions should be characterized in such a way that deliberation is unnecessary. In this paper, I examine three possible solutions: radical externalism, unconscious psychologism, and unconscious factualism. I argue that these proposals all fail to cast reasons in their proper role. In light of that, I propose an alternative view of how to account for habitual virtuous actions, based on the work of G. E. M. Anscombe. I maintain that if we focus on the inherently rational structure of actions, the tension between acting habitually and acting for the right reason dissolves.
psychology, multidisciplinary,ethics
What problem does this paper attempt to address?