Abstract:This paper concerns the credibility problem for commitments. Commitments play an important role in cooperative human interactions and can dramatically improve the performance of joint actions by stabilizing expectations, reducing the uncertainty of the interaction, providing reasons to cooperate or improving action coordination. However, commitments can only serve these functions if they are credible in the first place. What is it then that insures the credibility of commitments? To answer this question, we need to provide an account of what motivates us to abide by our commitments. We first discuss two conceptions of the nature of the commitments present in joint action and of the norms that govern them. We contend that while normative considerations may have some motivational force, there are reasons to doubt that they, by themselves, could provide a sufficient motivational basis to fully explain why agents abide by their commitments and thus why their commitments are credible. In the next two sections, we discuss two proposals regarding further sources of motivation, reputation management and social emotions. We argue that while reputation management and social emotions certainly play a role in motivating us to act as committed, there are both theoretical and empirical reasons to think that neither captures the most basic motivational force at work in sustaining commitments. We propose instead that the need to belong, i.e., the need to affiliate with others and form long-lasting bonds with them, is what primarily motivates us to interact and engage with those around us and act so as to preserve and reinforce the bonds we have forged with them. We argue that the need to belong is a more basic proximate motivation for conforming to commitments, in the sense both that affiliative behaviors are evidenced much earlier in human development than either reputation management or social emotions and that the need to belong is at least part of an explanation of why we care for our reputation and why we care about others' assessments of our behavior.

Moral, conventional, personal: reasons for action as dimensions of normativity

Beyond Whom and When

Norms and the Flexibility of Moral Action

The Inherent Normativity of Concepts

Defining Normativity

Perceiving persons and their purposes: teleology, normativity, and personal identity

Human and nonhuman norms: a dimensional framework

A pluralistic framework for the psychology of norms

Values and Behavior: Strength and Structure of Relations

A Person-Centered Approach to Moral Judgment

Bodies obliged and unbound: Differentiated response tendencies for injunctive and descriptive social norms.

Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics

Psychological Functions of Subjective Norms

Rethinking Norm Psychology

Agency’s Constitutive Normativity: An Elucidation

Moral Stories: Situated Reasoning about Norms, Intents, Actions, and their Consequences

How do Basic Personality Traits Map onto Moral Judgements of Fairness-related Actions?

How Do Basic Personality Traits Map Onto Moral Judgments of Fairness-Related Actions?

The “Normative Turn” in Sociological Theory: Sociology’s Garden of the Forking Paths

Resource-rational contractualism: A triple theory of moral cognition

Joint actions, commitments and the need to belong