Abstract:Decades of research document individual differences in prosocial behavior using controlled experiments that model social interactions in situations of interdependence. However, theoretical and empirical integration of the vast literature on the predictive validity of personality traits to account for these individual differences is missing. Here, we present a theoretical framework that identifies 4 broad situational affordances across interdependent situations (i.e., exploitation, reciprocity, temporal conflict, and dependence under uncertainty) and more specific subaffordances within certain types of interdependent situations (e.g., possibility to increase equality in outcomes) that can determine when, which, and how personality traits should be expressed in prosocial behavior. To test this framework, we meta-analyzed 770 studies reporting on 3,523 effects of 8 broad and 43 narrow personality traits on prosocial behavior in interdependent situations modeled in 6 commonly studied economic games (Dictator Game, Ultimatum Game, Trust Game, Prisoner's Dilemma, Public Goods Game, and Commons Dilemma). Overall, meta-analytic correlations ranged between -.18 ≤ ρ̂ ≤ .26, and most traits yielding a significant relation to prosocial behavior had conceptual links to the affordances provided in interdependent situations, most prominently the possibility for exploitation. Moreover, for several traits, correlations within games followed the predicted pattern derived from a theoretical analysis of affordances. On the level of traits, we found that narrow and broad traits alike can account for prosocial behavior, informing the bandwidth-fidelity problem. In sum, the meta-analysis provides a theoretical foundation that can guide future research on prosocial behavior and advance our understanding of individual differences in human prosociality. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

How do Basic Personality Traits Map onto Moral Judgements of Fairness-related Actions?

How Do Basic Personality Traits Map Onto Moral Judgments of Fairness-Related Actions?

Moral Positive Illusion: Self–other Valuation Difference in Moral Foundation Theory

Impacts Of Social Comparison And Fairness Facet Preference On Justice Judgments

Personality and prosocial behavior: A theoretical framework and meta-analysis.

The effect of experiences of fairness on honest behavior: a behavioral and neural study

How is the AI Perceived when It Behaves (Un)fairly?

Are the autonomic and central neurophysiological correlates predictive of moral and economic offers?

Self-Perceptions of Fairness in Individual and Group Contexts

Norms and the Flexibility of Moral Action

Why moral psychology needs personality psychology

How do people judge fairness in supervisor and peer relationships? Another assessment of the dimensions of justice

Sex-based differences in fairness norm compliance and neural circuitry

The Relative Importance of Target and Judge Characteristics in Shaping the Moral Circle

Effort-based decision making in joint action: Evidence of a sense of fairness

Individual Differences in Selfishness as a Major Dimension of Personality: A Reinterpretation of the Sixth Personality Factor

A mutualistic approach to morality: the evolution of fairness by partner choice

Personality correlates of social attitudes and social distance

Fairness, fast and slow: A review of dual process models of fairness

Principles of Moral Accounting: How our Intuitive Moral Sense Balances Rights and Wrongs

Affordances in social judgment: Experimental proof of why it is a mistake to ignore how others behave towards a target and look solely at how the target behaves