Contemporary Views and Practices on GME Dizziness and HINTS Exam Curricula: A National Survey of Emergency Medicine Residency Program Directors

Mary McLean,Justin Stowens,Ryan Barnicle,Negar Shah,Kaushal Shah

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.20419

2024-03-25

Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract:Author(s): McLean, Mary; Stowens, Justin; Barnicle, Ryan; Shah, Negar; Shah, Kaushal

emergency medicine

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department 3 (GRACE‐3): Acute dizziness and vertigo in the emergency department

Jonathan A. Edlow,Christopher Carpenter,Murtaza Akhter,Danya Khoujah,Evie Marcolini,William J. Meurer,David Morrill,James G. Naples,Robert Ohle,Rodney Omron,Sameer Sharif,Matt Siket,Suneel Upadhye,Etta Sundberg,Karen Tartt,Simone Vanni,David E. Newman‐Toker,Fernanda Bellolio,Lucas Oliveira J. e Silva

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.14728

2023-05-13

Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract:This third Guideline for Reasonable and Appropriate Care in the Emergency Department (GRACE‐3) from the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine is on the topic adult patients with acute dizziness and vertigo in the emergency department (ED). A multidisciplinary guideline panel applied the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) approach to assess the certainty of evidence and strength of recommendations regarding five questions for adult ED patients with acute dizziness of less than 2 weeks' duration. The intended population is adults presenting to the ED with acute dizziness or vertigo. The panel derived 15 evidence‐based recommendations based on the timing and triggers of the dizziness but recognizes that alternative diagnostic approaches exist, such as the STANDING protocol and nystagmus examination in combination with gait unsteadiness or the presence of vascular risk factors. As an overarching recommendation, (1) emergency clinicians should receive training in bedside physical examination techniques for patients with the acute vestibular syndrome (AVS; HINTS) and the diagnostic and therapeutic maneuvers for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo (BPPV; Dix–Hallpike test and Epley maneuver). To help distinguish central from peripheral causes in patients with the AVS, we recommend: (2) use HINTS (for clinicians trained in its use) in patients with nystagmus, (3) use finger rub to further aid in excluding stroke in patients with nystagmus, (4) use severity of gait unsteadiness in patients without nystagmus, (5) do not use brain computed tomography (CT), (6) do not use routine magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as a first‐line test if a clinician trained in HINTS is available, and (7) use MRI as a confirmatory test in patients with central or equivocal HINTS examinations. In patients with the spontaneous episodic vestibular syndrome: (8) search for symptoms or signs of cerebral ischemia, (9) do not use CT, and (10) use CT angiography or MRI angiography if there is concern for transient ischemic attack. In patients with the triggered (positional) episodic vestibular syndrome, (11) use the Dix–Hallpike test to diagnose posterior canal BPPV (pc‐BPPV), (12) do not use CT, and (13) do not use MRI routinely, unless atypical clinical features are present. In patients diagnosed with vestibular neuritis, (14) consider short‐term steroids as a treatment option. In patients diagnosed with pc‐BPPV, (15) treat with the Epley maneuver. It is clear that as of 2023, when applied in routine practice by emergency clinicians without special training, HINTS testing is inaccurate, partly due to use in the wrong patients and partly due to issues with its interpretation. Most emergency physicians have not received training in use of HINTS. As such, it is not standard of care, either in the legal sense of that term ("what the average physician would do in similar circumstances") or in the common parlance sense ("the standard action typically used by physicians in routine practice").

emergency medicine
Perspectives of Emergency Physicians, Primary Care Physicians, and Otolaryngologists on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Vertigo

Melike Nur Dede,Yuşa Başoğlu,Berrin Yilmaz,Mustafa Bülent Şerbetçioğlu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1044/2022_AJA-22-00146

Abstract:Purpose: This study aimed to explore the differences in diagnosis (Dix-Hallpike test; the head impulse, nystagmus, and the test of skew [HINTS] procedures; imaging modalities; and audiological battery) and treatment (pharmacological treatments and the Epley maneuver) of acute vertigo (AV) by examining the perspectives of otolaryngologists, emergency physicians (EPs), and primary care physicians (PCPs). Method: A total of 123 physicians (otolaryngologists [n = 40], EPs [n = 41], PCPs [n = 42]) were included in this study. This study was conducted using an online questionnaire created in Google Forms. The questionnaire included five demographic questions and eight questions assessing the diagnosis and treatment of four case scenarios (benign paroxysmal positional vertigo [BPPV], vestibular neuronitis, Meniere's disease [MD], and vertebrobasilar insufficiency). Multiple-response and chi-square tests were used to analyze the data. Results: In the case of BPPV, 82.5% of otolaryngologists, 73.2% of EPs, and 59.6% of PCPs preferred the "Dix-Hallpike maneuver" (p = .067). In addition, 72.5% of otolaryngologists, 48.8% of EPs, and 47.6% of PCPs preferred the Epley maneuver for treatment in a case with BPPV (p = .032). It was found that physicians preferred the most (18.9%) "videonystagmography (VNG)-caloric" test for diagnosis in the MD case. There was a statistically significant difference in the intravenous serum therapy and rest, and Epley maneuver preferences of physicians for the treatment of cases with MD (p = .002 and p = .046). Conclusions: In this study, significant differences were found in the AV care provided by different specialties. Standardized education systems for AV (symposiums, congresses, scientific activities, etc., with multidisciplinary participation) may be beneficial for improving the diagnosis and treatment process of AV in our country.
Approach to Acute Dizziness/Vertigo in the Emergency Department: Selected Controversies Regarding Specialty Consultation

Madeleine M. Puissant,Susan Giampalmo,Charles R. Wira,Joshua N. Goldstein,David E. Newman-Toker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1161/strokeaha.123.043406

IF: 10.17

2024-09-15

Stroke

Abstract:Stroke, Ahead of Print. Acute dizziness and vertigo are common emergency department presentations (≈4% of annual visits) and sometimes, a life-threatening diagnosis like stroke is missed. Recent literature reviews the challenges in evaluation of these symptoms and offers guidelines for diagnostic approaches. Strong evidence indicates that when well-trained providers perform a high-quality bedside neurovestibular examination, accurate diagnosis of peripheral vestibular disorders and stroke increases. However, it is less clear who can and should be performing these assessments on a routine basis. This article offers a focused debate for and against routine specialty consultation for patients with acute dizziness or vertigo in the emergency department as well as a potential path forward utilizing new portable technologies to quantify eye movements.

peripheral vascular disease,clinical neurology
Virtual-reality-enhanced mannequin to train emergency physicians to examine dizzy patients using the HINTS method

Guillaume Ursat,Morgane Corda,Julien Ryard,Christophe Guillet,Caroline Guigou,Cindy Tissier,Alexis Bozorg Grayeli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fneur.2023.1335121

IF: 3.4

2024-01-05

Frontiers in Neurology

Abstract:Introduction: Acute vertigo is a frequent chief complaint in the emergency departments, and its efficient management requires thorough training. The HINTS protocol is a valid method to screen patients in the emergency room, but its application in routine is hindered by the lack of training. This study aimed to evaluate the training of emergency physicians for the HINTS method based on a mannequin-based virtual reality simulator (MBVRS). Methods: We conducted a monocenter, prospective, longitudinal, and randomized cohort study in an Emergency Department at a regional university hospital. We included 34 emergency physicians randomized into two equal groups matched by age and professional experience. The control group attended a theoretical lesson with video demonstrations and the test group received a simulation-based training in addition to the lecture. Results: We showed that the test group had a higher diagnosis performance for the HINTS method compared to the control group as evaluated by the simulator at 1 month (89% sensitivity versus 45, and 100% specificity versus 86% respectively, p < 001, Fisher's exact test). Evaluation at 6 months showed a similar advantage to the test group. Discussion: The MBVRS is a useful pedagogic tool for the HINTS protocol in the emergency department. The advantage of a unique training session can be measured up to 6 months after the lesson.

neurosciences,clinical neurology
Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo in the Emergency Department: A Stepped-Wedge Randomized Trial

Kevin A Kerber,Laura Damschroder,Thomas McLaughlin,Devin L Brown,James F Burke,Steven A Telian,Alexander Tsodikov,Angela Fagerlin,Lawrence C An,Lewis B Morgenstern,Jane Forman,Sandeep Vijan,Brigid Rowell,William J Meurer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annemergmed.2019.09.017

Abstract:Study objective: We evaluated a strategy to increase use of the test (Dix-Hallpike's test [DHT]) and treatment (canalith repositioning maneuver [CRM]) for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo in emergency department (ED) dizziness visits. Methods: We conducted a stepped-wedge randomized trial in 6 EDs. The population was visits with dizziness as a principal reason for the visit. The intervention included educational sessions and decision aid materials. Outcomes were DHT or CRM documentation (primary), head computed tomography (CT) use, length of stay, admission, and 90-day stroke events. The analysis was multilevel logistic regression with intervention, month, and hospital as fixed effects and provider as a random effect. We assessed fidelity with monitoring intervention use and semistructured interviews. Results: We identified 7,635 dizziness visits during 18 months. The DHT or CRM was documented in 1.5% of control visits (45/3,077; 95% confidence interval 1% to 1.9%) and 3.5% of intervention visits (159/4,558; 95% confidence interval 3% to 4%; difference 2%, 95% confidence interval 1.3% to 2.7%). Head CT use was lower in intervention visits compared with control visits (44.0% [1,352/3,077] versus 36.9% [1,682/4,558]). No differences were observed in admission or 90-day subsequent stroke risk. In fidelity evaluations, providers who used the materials typically reported positive clinical experiences but provider engagement was low at facilities without an emergency medicine residency program. Conclusion: These findings provide evidence that an implementation strategy of a benign paroxysmal positional vertigo-focused approach to ED dizziness visits can be successful and safe in promoting evidence-based care. Absolute rates of DHT and CRM use, however, were still low, which relates in part to our broad inclusion criteria for dizziness visits.
An Emergency Simulation Course in a Postdoctoral General Dentistry Program: The New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine Experience.

Marsha E Rubin,H. J. Hansen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.21815/JDE.017.094

2017-11-01

Journal of Dental Education

Abstract:Dentists can encounter life-threatening medical emergencies during the provision of routine dental care and must therefore be comfortable with the management of these emergencies. High-fidelity simulation has been used routinely in medical and surgical training and is a recognized and effective educational and assessment tool. The aim of this study was to develop and evaluate a new high-fidelity simulation training course in medical emergency management for residents in the General Practice Residency program at New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine. In academic years 2014-16, first-year GPR residents were required to take a simulation course covering medical emergency scenarios that are commonly encountered in the dental office. The course involved a team approach to emergency management with active participation by faculty and residents and with each training session followed by feedback and a formal review of the emergencies covered. Evaluation was achieved through completion of questionnaires by the residents following each session. A total of 14 residents (seven in each year) participated, completing 78 questionnaires in the two-year period. They gave the course an overall rating of 4.91 on a scale from 1 to 5, indicating strong agreement with the utility of the course as a learning tool in medical emergency management training. This course is now fully integrated into the GPR educational program at this institution and is a successful component of the emergency medicine curriculum.

Medicine
Snapshot of Examination Usage in Emergency Medicine Clerkships

William D Alley,Iltifat Husain,Blake Briggs,David Story

DOI: https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.67301

2024-08-20

Cureus

Abstract:Objective Emergency Medicine (EM) clerkships often use a written exam to assess the knowledge gained over the course of an EM rotation in medical school. Clerkship Directors (CDs) may choose the National Board of Medical Examiners (NBME) EM Advanced Clinical Science Subject Exam (ACE), the Society for Academic Emergency Medicine (SAEM) M4 exam, which has two versions, the SAEM M3 exam, or departmental exams. There are currently no published guidelines or consensus regarding their utility. This survey-based study was designed to collect data regarding current practices of EM clerkship exam usage to analyze trends and variability in what exams are used and how. Methods The authors designed a cross-sectional observational survey to collect data from EM CDs on exam utilization in clerkships. The survey population consisted of clerkship directors, assistant clerkship directors, or faculty familiar assessments in their EM clerkship. Initial dissemination was by electronic distribution to subscribers of the Clerkship Directors in Emergency Medicine (CDEM) list-serve on the SAEM website. Subsequently, contact information of CD's from institutions that had not responded was obtained by manual search of the Emergency Medicine Residents' Association (EMRA) Match website and individual correspondence was sent at regular intervals. Data obtained include clerkship characteristics, exam used, weight of the exam relative to the overall grade, and alternatives if the preferred exam was previously taken. Results Eighty-seven programs (42% response rate) completed the survey between August 2019 and February 2021. Of the 87 responses, 71 (82%) were completed by a CD. Forty-six (53%) institutions required an EM rotation. Students were tested in 34 (74%) required EM clerkships and 48 (69%) out of 70 EM electives. In required rotations that used an exam, 20 (59%) used the NBME EM ACE, while 28 of 46 (61%) of EM electives that reported an exam used the SAEM M4 Exam. Five (15%) of the required clerkships used a departmental exam. Of clerkships requiring an exam, 46 (57%) weighed the score at 11-30% of the final grade. Data for extramural rotations mirrored that of EM electives. One-third of respondents indicated they do not inquire about previously taken exams. Conclusion This survey demonstrates significant variability in the type of exam, the weighting of the score, and alternatives if the preferred exam was previously taken. The lack of a consistent approach in how these exams are used in determining students' final EM grades diminishes the reliability of the EM clerkship grade as a factor used by residency directors in choosing future residents. Further research on optimal usage of these exams is needed.
Where Do We Go from here? Post-pandemic Planning and the Future of Graduate Medical Education

Lauren T. Roth,Leora Mogilner,Hina Talib,Ellen J. Silver,Suzanne Friedman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-023-01737-8

2023-02-06

Medical Science Educator

Abstract:BackgroundAs the pandemic wanes, there is an opportunity to reevaluate resultant changes in graduate medical education (GME), particularly from the viewpoints of those affected most. We aimed to assess both trainee and faculty perceptions on the educational changes and innovations resulting from the pandemic to inform future educational planning.MethodsWe surveyed trainees and core education faculty at three New York City children’s hospitals. Surveys assessed perceived changes to educational activities, skills, scholarship, effectiveness of virtual teaching, future desirability, and qualitative themes.ResultsThe survey was completed by 194 participants, including 88 (45.4%) faculty and 106 (54.6%) trainees. Trainees were more likely to report a negative impact of the pandemic compared with faculty (75.5% vs. 50%, p < 0.01). Most respondents reported a decrease in formal educational activities (69.8%), inpatient (77.7%) and outpatient (77.8%) clinical teaching. Despite this, most perceived clinical and teaching skills to have stayed the same. Most (93.4%) participated in virtual education; however, only 36.5% of faculty taught virtually. Only 4.2% of faculty had extensive training in virtual teaching and 28.9% felt very comfortable teaching virtually. In the future, most (87.5%) prefer a hybrid approach, particularly virtual didactic conferences and virtual grand rounds. Faculty themes included challenges to workflows and increased empathy for trainees, while trainee themes included increased work/life balance and support, but increased burnout.ConclusionMany changes and innovations resulted from the pandemic. Hospital systems and GME programs should consider this data and incorporate viewpoints from trainees and faculty when adapting educational strategies in the future.
Dizziness: Approach to Evaluation and Management

Herbert L Muncie,Susan M Sirmans,Ernest James

2017-02-01

Abstract:Dizziness is a common yet imprecise symptom. It was traditionally divided into four categories based on the patient's history: vertigo, presyncope, disequilibrium, and light-headedness. However, the distinction between these symptoms is of limited clinical usefulness. Patients have difficulty describing the quality of their symptoms but can more consistently identify the timing and triggers. Episodic vertigo triggered by head motion may be due to benign paroxysmal positional vertigo. Vertigo with unilateral hearing loss suggests Meniere disease. Episodic vertigo not associated with any trigger may be a symptom of vestibular neuritis. Evaluation focuses on determining whether the etiology is peripheral or central. Peripheral etiologies are usually benign. Central etiologies often require urgent treatment. The HINTS (head-impulse, nystagmus, test of skew) examination can help distinguish peripheral from central etiologies. The physical examination includes orthostatic blood pressure measurement, a full cardiac and neurologic examination, assessment for nystagmus, and the Dix-Hallpike maneuver. Laboratory testing and imaging are not required and are usually not helpful. Benign paroxysmal positional vertigo can be treated with a canalith repositioning procedure (e.g., Epley maneuver). Treatment of Meniere disease includes salt restriction and diuretics. Symptoms of vestibular neuritis are relieved with vestibular suppressant medications and vestibular rehabilitation.
Recent Trends and Challenges in Employment for Emergency Medicine Trainees: A Survey of Graduating Residents' Perspectives

Josh Greenstein,Jennifer Kaminsky,Anthony Elias,Aron Friedlander,Barry Hahn,Abbas Husain

DOI: https://doi.org/10.14423/SMJ.0000000000001720

Abstract:Objectives: The landscape of the emergency medicine (EM) workforce has undergone significant changes recently, posing challenges for residents who are about to graduate from EM training programs. The objective of this study was to survey graduating residents' perceptions of the recent EM job market. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional survey study involving EM residents from programs in New York and New Jersey between August 2021 and November 2021. The survey consisted of 12 multiple-choice questions that focused on graduating EM residents' perceptions of the EM job market, its impact on their job search, and their interest in pursuing fellowship training. Results: During the study period, 436 survey results were collected from 26 EM residency programs. Of the 418 respondents, 233 (56%) expressed their intention to start their job search earlier than their counterparts in previous years, as highlighted by the survey. Among respondents, 141 (76%) postgraduate year (PGY)-2, 139 (79%) PGY-3, and 47 (85%) PGY-4 residents anticipated a challenging job search. Nearly 90% of respondents believed that the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic would affect both academic and nonacademic medical centers in terms of job openings. A total of 248 (59%) were interested in pursuing a fellowship after residency. Most residents preferred job opportunities on the East and West Coasts of the United States. Conclusions: The findings highlight the increasing competitiveness and challenges residents face in securing their first job, the declining interest in pursuing fellowships as residents progress in their training, and the geographic preferences for job opportunities.
The Epidemiology of Patients with Dizziness in an Emergency Department

JMY Lam,WS Siu,TS Lam,NK Cheung,CA Graham,TH Rainer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/102490790601300302

2006-07-01

Hong Kong Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract:Objectives The aims of this prospective study were (1) to describe the patterns of presentation, causes and disposition of patients with dizziness in an emergency department (ED) and (2) to identify the factors that predict central vestibular disorder. Methods All adult patients (≥18 years) attending our ED with a chief complaint of dizziness were included. Demographic characteristics, presenting complaint, symptoms, past medical illnesses, physical findings, provisional diagnosis and disposition were recorded in a data collection sheet by the medical officers. Results A total of 104 consecutive dizzy patients were recruited from 12th to 19th December 2003. The incidence of adult patients with dizziness was 4.0% (104/2594). There were 34 (32.7%) male and 70 (67.3%) female patients; 64 (61.5%) patients were below 65 and 40 (38.5%) were above 65. Lightheadedness (61.5%), vertigo (31.7%) and disequilibrium (4.8%) were the most frequent complaints. Nausea and/or vomiting (32.7%) and raised blood pressure on arrival (23.1%) were the most common associated symptoms and physical finding respectively. Hypertension (38.5%) was the most common pre-existing medical illness. Of all patients, 63.5% had non-vestibular disorder, 31.7% had peripheral vestibular disorder and 4.8% had central vestibular disorder. A clinical diagnosis could be made in 52.9% of our dizzy patients and about 20 different diagnoses were made. The majority (82.7%) of the patients were discharged from the ED. A presenting complaint of lightheadedness, altered mental state, focal neurological signs, raised blood pressure and history of stroke were predictors of central vestibular disorder (p<0.05). Conclusions Lightheadedness and vertigo were the two commonest presentations of dizzy patients. Most dizzy patients had benign causes and could be discharged from the ED. Lightheadedness, focal neurological symptoms and signs, altered mental state, hypertension and previous stroke were factors that would help to diagnose central vestibular disorder.

emergency medicine
Delirium Prevention, Detection, and Treatment in Emergency Medicine Settings: A Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) Network Scoping Review and Consensus Statement

Christopher R. Carpenter,Nada Hammouda,Elizabeth A. Linton,Michelle Doering,Ugochi K. Ohuabunwa,Kelly J. Ko,William W. Hung,Manish N. Shah,Lee A. Lindquist,Kevin Biese,Daniel Wei,Libby Hoy,Lori Nerbonne,Ula Hwang,Scott M. Dresden,M Fernanda Bellolio,Kevin Biese,Christine Binkley,Nicholas Bott,Abraham Brody,Christopher Carpenter,Sunday Clark,M Scott Dresden,Savannah Forrester,Lowell Gerson,Cameron Gettel,Elizabeth Goldberg,Allyson Greenberg,Nada Hammouda,Jin Han,S. Nicole Hastings,Tess Hogan,William Hung,Ula Hwang,Jay Kayser,Maura Kennedy,Kelly Ko,Adriane Lesser,Elizabeth Linton,Shan Liu,Aaron Malsch,Daniel Matlock,Frances McFarland,Don Melady,Carmen Morano,Nancy Morrow‐Howell,Denise Nassisi,Lori Nerbonne,Sylvie Nyamu,Ugochi Ohuabunwa,Timothy Platts‐Mills,Luna Ragsdale,Lynne Richardson,Thom Ringer,Anthony Rosen,Mark Rosenberg,Manish Shah,Rachel Skains,Stephanie Skees,Kimberly Souffront,Laura Stabler,Connor Sullivan,Joe Suyama,Samuel Vargas,E. Camille Vaughan,Corrine Voils,Daniel Wei,Nancy Wexler,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/acem.14166

2020-12-12

Academic Emergency Medicine

Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Background</h3><p>Older adult delirium is often unrecognized in the emergency department (ED), yet the most compelling research questions to overcome knowledge‐to‐practice deficits remain undefined. The Geriatric Emergency care Applied Research (GEAR) Network was organized to identify and prioritize delirium clinical questions.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>GEAR identified and engaged 49 transdisciplinary stakeholders including emergency physicians, geriatricians, nurses, social workers, pharmacists, and patient advocates. Adhering to Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta‐Analyses for Scoping Reviews, clinical questions were derived, medical librarian electronic searches conducted, and applicable research evidence synthesized for ED delirium detection, prevention, and management. The scoping review served as the foundation for a consensus conference to identify the highest priority research foci.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>In the scoping review, 27 delirium detection "instruments" were described in 48 ED studies and used variable criterion standards with the result of delirium prevalence ranging from 6% to 38%. Clinician gestalt was the most common "instrument" evaluated with sensitivity ranging from 0% to 81% and specificity from 65% to 100%. For delirium management 15 relevant studies were identified, including one randomized controlled trial. Some intervention studies targeted clinicians via education and others used clinical pathways. Three medications were evaluated to reduce or prevent ED delirium. No intervention consistently prevented or treated delirium. After reviewing the scoping review results, the GEAR stakeholders identified ED delirium prevention interventions not reliant upon additional nurse or physician effort as the highest priority research.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Transdisciplinary stakeholders prioritize ED delirium prevention studies that are not reliant upon healthcare worker tasks instead of alternative research directions such as defining etiologic delirium phenotypes to target prevention or intervention strategies.</p></section>

emergency medicine
Teaching the Emergency Department Patient Experience: Needs Assessment from the CORD-EM Task Force

Kory S. London,Jeffrey Druck,Matthew Silver,Douglas Finefrock,Kory London

DOI: https://doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2016.9.30667

2017-01-19

Western Journal of Emergency Medicine

Abstract:INTRODUCTION: Since the creation of Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) patient satisfaction (PS) scores, patient experience (PE) has become a metric that can profoundly affect the fiscal balance of hospital systems, reputation of entire departments and welfare of individual physicians. While government and hospital mandates demonstrate the prominence of PE as a quality measure, no such mandate exists for its education. The objective of this study was to determine the education and evaluation landscape for PE in categorical emergency medicine (EM) residencies.METHODS: This was a prospective survey analysis of the Council of Emergency Medicine Residency Directors (CORD) membership. Program directors (PDs), assistant PDs and core faculty who are part of the CORD listserv were sent an email link to a brief, anonymous electronic survey. Respondents were asked their position in the residency, the name of their department, and questions regarding the presence and types of PS evaluative data and PE education they provide.RESULTS: We obtained 168 responses from 139 individual residencies, representing 72% of all categorical EM residencies. This survey found that only 27% of responding residencies provide PS data to their residents. Of those programs, 61% offer simulation scores, 39% provide third-party attending data on cases with resident participation, 37% provide third-party acquired data specifically about residents and 37% provide internally acquired quantitative data. Only 35% of residencies reported having any organized PE curricula. Of the programs that provide an organized PE curriculum, most offer multiple modalities; 96% provide didactic lectures, 49% small group sessions, 47% simulation sessions and 27% specifically use standardized patient encounters in their simulation sessions.CONCLUSION: The majority of categorical EM residencies do not provide either PS data or any organized PE curriculum. Those that do use a heterogeneous set of data collection modalities and educational techniques. American Osteopathic Association and Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education residencies show no significant differences in their resident PS data provision or formal curricula. Further work is needed to improve education given the high stakes of PS scores in the emergency physician's career.

emergency medicine
Emergency physicians perspectives of state continuing medical education requirements for medical licensure

Marianne Gausche-Hill,Yachana Bhakta,Michael C Bond,Sandra M Schneider,Jeffrey Druck,Colleen E Livingston,Lisa Moreno-Walton,Jonathan S Jones,Melissa A Barton

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/emp2.13314

2024-10-09

Abstract:Objectives: This study aims to better understand the perspectives of emergency medicine physicians' on the role that state-mandated, topic-specific continuing medical education (CME) plays in addressing knowledge gaps, its relevance to current emergency practice, its reported burden and costs of CME activities to emergency physicians, and its perceived improvement in patient care. Methods: A cross-sectional survey was designed by the Coalition of Board-Certified Emergency Physicians (COBCEP) and distributed in February 2023 to all American Board of Emergency Medicine (ABEM)-certified physicians. Statistical tests of significance (Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact test) assessed the cost and time spent on CME as well as the perceived value placed on CME by ABEM-certified physicians to improve patient care. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results: There were 5562 (13.0%) responses from the 43656 physicians who received the survey-5506 responses were included for analysis. Over half of the physicians (53.0%) had more than 15 years of post-residency practice experience. Most physicians (57.3%) spent less than $5,000 per year on obtaining CME. Most physicians practicing in states with state-mandated, topic-specific CME requirements believed that participation in ABEM continuing certification could be used to reduce the need for state-mandated, topic-specific CME requirements (83.6%) and state-mandated, topic-specific requirements were believed to be unlikely to improve patient care (70.8%). Conclusions: Although well-intended, state CME requirements may lack relevancy and can, at times, place an undue burden on emergency physicians. Tailoring CME requirements to increase relevance to their patient populations and reduce barriers to completing CME could enhance knowledge translation and improve patient outcomes.
Residency Education Practices in Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery

Rose Dimitroyannis,Sharanya Thodupunoori,Sean P Polster,Paramita Das,Christopher R Roxbury

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2226-8294

2024-01-23

Abstract:Background There has been increased interest in how residents train in the subspecialty of skull base surgery. Examining which training methods are popular and effective to optimize residency learning is necessary, especially with new training adjuncts available to the modern trainee. In this study, we survey North American Skull Base Society (NASBS) members to analyze endoscopic skull base surgery education methods. Methods The NASBS membership was surveyed regarding endoscopic skull base surgery teaching and feedback methods using a Likert scale via an anonymized REDCap form over 4 months. Results With a response rate of 10.1%, we found that informal teaching methods and verbal qualitative feedback were rated significantly more effective than other teaching and feedback methods ( p < 0.01). When comparing the opinions of otolaryngologists and neurosurgeons, otolaryngologists were less likely to believe feedback is most effective with a shared grading scale ( p < 0.01). Physicians with more than 10 years of experience posttraining felt model- and rubric-based teaching were used more frequently ( p < 0.01). Respondents indicated that standardization and use of simulation, artificial intelligence, and virtual reality should be at the forefront of educational practices used in the field in the coming 5 to 10 years. Conclusion Despite the current emphasis on informal training, respondents pointed to standardization and simulation as methods of endoscopic skull base surgery education that should be used more in the future. These results indicate an unmet need in skull base education. Future multi-institutional initiatives with NASBS membership participation are warranted.
Pediatric magnetic resonance imaging training versus job-readiness: using education research tools to re-align

Janet R Reid,Jorge Delgado,Tigist A Hailu,Jillian S Dayneka,Susan J Back,Ami Gokli

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-021-05047-2

Abstract:Background: Fellows begin MRI training with variable experience and expertise. To better serve patients, pediatric radiology fellows should gain competence in MRI that enables seamless transition to independent practice. Objective: We implemented a needs assessment survey and conducted a focus group discussion to identify knowledge gaps and inform creation of a curriculum for pediatric body MRI. Materials and methods: We electronically distributed a comprehensive anonymous needs assessment survey in October 2016 to current fellows and recent (<5 years) graduates from Accreditation Council for Graduate Medical Education (ACGME)-accredited pediatric radiology fellowships, with follow-up in January 2017. We conducted a focus group discussion among current fellows at our institution in October 2017 to inform a better understanding of the results. Results: Eighty-one pediatric radiologists (8 fellows/73 attendings) completed the survey (24%); 5 current fellows participated in the focus group. The technical issues most commonly identified with limited or no instruction during training included setting up an MR service, accessory equipment (coil) selection and MRI field inhomogeneity correction. Areas needing increased attention and inclusion within the curriculum included coil choice/patient positioning (n=42, 52%), contrast agents (n=40, 49%), field strength (n=33, 41%) and strategies for motion correction (n=33, 41%). Most fellows were uncomfortable with setting up an MR service (n=57, 70%), correcting field inhomogeneity (n=56, 69%) and improving image quality (n=50, 62%). The focus group showed consensus that there was insufficient MR training in residency to prepare them for fellowship. The group also preferred shorter lectures and streaming via video education/tutorials. Conclusion: While traditional instruction emphasizes image interpretation, trainees in pediatric radiology need a curriculum that also emphasizes technical and non-interpretive aspects of MRI.
[Dizziness in the emergency department - do we lack clinical judgment?]

Einar Hjaltested,Arni Ornolfsson,Hannes Petersen,Olof Birna Margretardottir

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17992/lbl.2016.12.112

2016-12-02

Abstract:OBJECTIVES The aim of this study was to evaluate the extent and quality of work-up of dizzy patients at the Landspitali Emergency department. PATIENTS AND METHODS All cases presenting to the emergency department with the main complaint of dizziness over a period of four months were analyzed retrospectively. Demographics, duration of symptoms, diagnosis and results from investigations and consultations were recorded from medical records. Investigations were categorized to blood tests, brain imaging and consultations to simplify interpretation of the results. RESULTS One hundred sixty three cases were identified. 28% were diagnosed with inner ear problem and 32% were discharged without diagnosis. A serious central nervous system cause was found in 4% of cases. About one-third underwent investigations from all of the three investigation categories. An acute CT scan of the brain was obtained in 40% and MRI in 17% of all cases. Consultation was obtained from a neurologist for 28%, ENT for 26% and a cardiologist for 2% of cases. 11.6% (n=19) of the patients were admitted to the hospital, 53% to neurology, 42% to internal medicine and 5% to ENT. CONCLUSIONS Dizziness is a common complaint in the emergency department and the cause is most often benign. Nevertheless, patients with dizziness routinely undergo extensive workup which often includes acute CT scan of the brain. Key words: vertigo, dizziness, CT, computed tomography, acute, emergency department. Correspondence: Arni Ornolfsson, arni.ornolfsson@skane.se.

Medicine
Internal Medicine Residents' Perceptions of Morning Report: a Multicenter Survey

Tyler J Albert,Jeff Redinger,Helene Starks,Joel Bradley,Craig G Gunderson,Dan Heppe,Kyle Kent,Michael Krug,Brian Kwan,James Laudate,Amanda Pensiero,Gina Raymond,Emily Sladek,Joseph R Sweigart,Paul B Cornia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-020-06351-7

Abstract:Background: Residents rate morning report (MR) as an essential educational activity. Little contemporary evidence exists to guide medical educators on the optimal content or most effective delivery strategies, particularly in the era of resident duty-hour limitations and shifts towards learner-centric pedagogy in graduate medical education. Objective: Assess resident views about MR content and teaching strategies. Design: Anonymous, online survey. Participants: Internal medicine residents from 10 VA-affiliated residency programs. Main measures: The 20-item survey included questions on demographics; frequency and reason for attending; opinions on who should attend, who should teach, and how to prioritize the teaching; and respondents' comfort level with participating in MR. The survey included a combination of Likert-style and multiple-choice questions with the option for multiple responses. Key results: A total of 497 residents (46%) completed the survey, with a balanced sample of R1s (33%), R2s (35%), and R3s (31%). Self-reported MR attendance was high (31% always attend; 39% attend > 50% of the time), with clinical duties being the primary barrier to attendance (85%). Most respondents felt that medical students (89%), R1 (96%), and R2/R3s (96%) should attend MR; there was less consensus regarding including attendings (61%) or fellows (34%). Top-rated educational topics included demonstration of clinical reasoning (82%), evidence-based medicine (77%), and disease pathophysiology (53%). Respondents valued time spent on diagnostic work-up (94%), management (93%), and differential building (90%). Overall, 82% endorsed feeling comfortable speaking; fewer R1s reported comfort (76%) compared with R2s (87%) or R3s (83%, p = 0.018). Most (81%) endorsed that MR was an inclusive learning environment (81%), with no differences by level of training. Conclusions: MR remains a highly regarded, well-attended educational conference. Residents value high-quality cases that emphasize clinical reasoning, diagnosis, and management. A supportive, engaging learning environment with expert input and concise, evidence-based teaching is desired.
A survey of essential anatomy from the perspective of anesthesiology, emergency medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, and orthopedics resident physicians

Derek J. Harmon,Mark H. Hankin,James R. Martindale,Iuliana Niculescu,Adrienne Aschmetat,Rachel E. Hanke,Andrew S. Koo,Shannon R. Carpenter,Pamela E. Emmanuel,Catherine M. Pokropek,Ksenia Koltun

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-024-06185-5

IF: 3.263

2024-10-24

BMC Medical Education

Abstract:Recent changes in anatomy curricula in undergraduate medical education (UME), including pedagogical changes and reduced time, pose challenges for foundational learning. Consequently, it is important to ask clinicians what anatomical content is important for their clinical specialty, which when taken collectively, can inform curricular development.

education & educational research,education, scientific disciplines
A comparison of pediatric emergency medicine and general emergency medicine physicians' practice patterns: results from the Future of Pediatric Education II Survey of Sections Project

James F Wiley 2nd,Susan Fuchs,Sarah E Brotherton,Georgine Burke,William L Cull,Janet Friday,Harold Simon,Ethan Alexander Jewett,Holly Mulvey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/00006565-200206000-00001

Abstract:Background: This survey was conducted to obtain information about career and practice issues facing pediatric emergency medicine (PEM) physicians and general emergency medicine (GEM) physicians. We hypothesized that PEM physicians work fewer clinical hours and perform more teaching and research in their positions than GEM physicians. Methods: Two surveys sponsored by the Future of Pediatric Education II Project were sent to 1545 emergency physicians identified by the American Board of Pediatrics, the American Academy of Pediatrics, and the American College of Emergency Physicians between October 1997 and February 1998. Data on demographics, job description, recent job changes, and career expectations were obtained and analyzed using Student t test or Welch analysis of variance for continuous variables and chi2 for categorical data. P values less than 0.05 were considered significant. Comparisons between PEM and GEM physicians were adjusted using analysis of covariance to control for the effect of medical school affiliation. Results: Effective response rate was 934 (64%) of 1451. A total of 705 (75%) respondents identified themselves as a PEM physician, and 229 (25%) identified as a GEM physician. PEM physicians were younger (41.0 y vs 45.1 y) and more likely to be women (44% vs 15%, P < 0.0001 for both). Children younger than 18 years made up 80.9% and 28.6% of patients seen by PEM and GEM physicians, respectively (P < 0.001). Seventy-nine percent of PEM physicians and 42% of GEM physicians held an academic appointment (P < 0.0001). No differences were found for full-time equivalents per physician group (9.7 vs 9.1) or clinical hours spent in the emergency department (ED) (31.5 vs 32.7) when means were adjusted for academic appointment. During ED clinical activities, PEM physicians reported more time spent supervising trainees (34% vs 16%, P < 0.0001), and GEM physicians reported more time spent in direct patient care (77% vs 57%, P < 0.0001). Total clinical hours worked per week were greater for GEM physicians (37.9 vs 35.3, P < 0.05). PEM physicians spent more time than GEM physicians teaching (12% vs 8%, P < 0.005) and conducting clinical research (5% vs 2%, P < 0.0003). Of PEM and GEM physicians combined, 26% reported a job change in the past 3 years. Extended reduction of ED clinical duties occurred most commonly because of child care issues and was reported more commonly by women than men (53% vs 6%, P < 0.0001) irrespective of PEM or GEM practice. The likelihood of leaving emergency medicine practice within 5 years increased with age for both groups: 10% of PEM and GEM physicians under 40 years old anticipated leaving practice versus 30% of those older than 50 years (P < 0.0001). PEM physicians were more likely than GEM physicians to predict an increased need for additional pediatric subspecialists in general (60% vs 26%, P < 0.001) and for pediatric subspecialists in their discipline (54% vs 17%, P < 0.001). PEM subspecialists were twice as likely as GEM specialists to perceive competition in their subspecialty (60% vs 31%, P < 0.001). Conclusions: According to our sample, GEM and PEM physicians worked the same number of clinical hours in the ED but reported significant differences in how those hours are spent. Job changes and extended leaves were common in both groups. These results suggest that PEM and GEM physicians face similar vocational challenges, especially in the areas of balancing of family time, clinical hours, and academic productivity. These data also have important implications for workforce projection for the PEM physician supply, given the current estimated attrition rate, frequency of leave from clinical duties, and projection for increased need for PEM physicians in the future.

Contemporary Views and Practices on GME Dizziness and HINTS Exam Curricula: A National Survey of Emergency Medicine Residency Program Directors

Guidelines for reasonable and appropriate care in the emergency department 3 (GRACE‐3): Acute dizziness and vertigo in the emergency department

Perspectives of Emergency Physicians, Primary Care Physicians, and Otolaryngologists on the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute Vertigo

Approach to Acute Dizziness/Vertigo in the Emergency Department: Selected Controversies Regarding Specialty Consultation

Virtual-reality-enhanced mannequin to train emergency physicians to examine dizzy patients using the HINTS method

Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice for Benign Paroxysmal Positional Vertigo in the Emergency Department: A Stepped-Wedge Randomized Trial

An Emergency Simulation Course in a Postdoctoral General Dentistry Program: The New York Presbyterian/Weill Cornell Medicine Experience.

Snapshot of Examination Usage in Emergency Medicine Clerkships

Where Do We Go from here? Post-pandemic Planning and the Future of Graduate Medical Education

Dizziness: Approach to Evaluation and Management

Recent Trends and Challenges in Employment for Emergency Medicine Trainees: A Survey of Graduating Residents' Perspectives

The Epidemiology of Patients with Dizziness in an Emergency Department

Delirium Prevention, Detection, and Treatment in Emergency Medicine Settings: A Geriatric Emergency Care Applied Research (GEAR) Network Scoping Review and Consensus Statement

Teaching the Emergency Department Patient Experience: Needs Assessment from the CORD-EM Task Force

Emergency physicians perspectives of state continuing medical education requirements for medical licensure

Residency Education Practices in Endoscopic Skull Base Surgery

Pediatric magnetic resonance imaging training versus job-readiness: using education research tools to re-align

[Dizziness in the emergency department - do we lack clinical judgment?]

Internal Medicine Residents' Perceptions of Morning Report: a Multicenter Survey

A survey of essential anatomy from the perspective of anesthesiology, emergency medicine, obstetrics and gynecology, and orthopedics resident physicians

A comparison of pediatric emergency medicine and general emergency medicine physicians' practice patterns: results from the Future of Pediatric Education II Survey of Sections Project