Are We Facing the End of Gross Anatomy Teaching as We Have Known It for Centuries?
Ana Yoe-Cheng Chang Chan,Maarten van Leeuwen,Olle ten Cate,Coen PM Stapper,Ronald LAW Bleys
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S378149
2022-10-02
Advances in Medical Education and Practice
Abstract:Ana Yoe-Cheng Chang Chan, 1 Coen PM Stapper, 2 Ronald LAW Bleys, 3 Maarten van Leeuwen, 2 Olle ten Cate 4 1 Department of Morphological Sciences, Faculty of Medical Sciences, National Autonomous University of Leon (UNAN-Leon), Leon, Nicaragua; 2 Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; 3 Department of Anatomy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands; 4 Utrecht Center for Research and Development of Health Professions Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, the Netherlands Correspondence: Olle ten Cate, Utrecht Center for Research and Development of Health Professions Education, University Medical Center Utrecht, Universiteitsweg 98, 3584 CG, Utrecht, the Netherlands, Tel +31.88.75.57010, Fax +31.88.75.53409, Email The status of anatomy education in undergraduate medical education has dramatically changed over the course of the past century. From the most important and time-consuming component of the preclinical program, anatomy education has reduced in size and status, and yielded in curricular space to accommodate other disciplines and topics. Meanwhile, radiology has become more prominent, as a means to visualize anatomy, not only in clinical care but also in education. For this perspective paper, the authors, all with backgrounds in anatomy, radiology and/or medical education, conducted structured conversations with several academic colleagues with similar backgrounds, reviewed pertinent literature and analyzed the causes of the historical decline of a knowledge domain of medical education, that nevertheless is widely considered essential for medical students and graduates. After this analysis, the authors propose four ways forward. These directions include systematic peer teaching and development of anatomy education as a scholarly domain, further vertical integration with postgraduate medical education, full integration with radiology education, and capitalizing on educational technology. Schools in several industrialized countries have made steps in these directions, which can be further strengthened. In less affluent countries, and in countries with curricula strongly determined by tradition, these steps are less easy to make. To respond to changes in global health and health care, combined with the inevitable technological progress, and international mobility, we believe all schools will move in these directions, slower or faster. Keywords: anatomy education, radiology education, vertical integration, technology, future Since Vesalius (1514–1564), the founder of accurate anatomy texts and drawings, and arguably the father of current anatomy teaching, medical education in the universities has had a strong emphasis on anatomy, if not being its core pillar for centuries. Around the turn of the previous century, two to three years of the preclinical curriculum devoted to morphology (anatomy, histology, and cytology) was considered time well spent, and around 1960, Dutch curricula still contained 225 to 572 hours of anatomy teaching. 1 Likewise, in 1901 medical schools in the United States had about 549 hours of anatomy teaching, and by 1955 approximately 330 hours. 2 The latter half of the 20th century showed a continuous decrease in the absolute and relative time devoted to teaching and learning anatomy in terms of curricular hours and in time students spend studying anatomy. While the same century has witnessed many changes in medical curricula, often aligning with Harden's SPICES model (more student-centered, problem-based, integrated, community-based, and systematic), 3 the decrease in time and effort to acquire anatomical content knowledge stands out. In one Dutch curriculum, the absolute time devoted to anatomy (and other basic sciences) decreased by 60% to about 100 hours in the period between 1990 and 2010, 4 in which year Australian/New Zealand medical schools ranged in total hours of anatomy teaching from as low as 56 to as high as 560. 5 A similar process happened in less affluent countries. In Nicaragua, by 2019, the medical curriculum contained 102 hours of anatomy teaching, 6 a reduction of 68% compared to 320 hours 20 years prior. Not all knowledge that, in the past, was considered relevant for medicine and patient care is still current. Some knowledge has become irrelevant, outdated, or discovered as incorrect. Regular adaptations in education are thus needed and justified. While new insights and advances in knowledge of basic and clinical sciences have been continuously added, and clinical training has become more prominent, existing components of the medical curriculum must decrease to make space. However, the decrease in time and attention for anatom -Abstract Truncated-