Abstract:Variation in the local thermal history during the Laser Powder Bed Fusion (LPBF) process in Additive Manufacturing (AM) can cause micropore defects, which add to the uncertainty of the mechanical properties (e.g., fatigue life, tensile strength) of the built materials. In-situ sensing has been proposed for monitoring the AM process to minimize defects, but successful minimization requires establishing a quantitative relationship between the sensing data and the porosity, which is particularly challenging with a large number of variables (e.g., laser speed, power, scan path, powder property). Physics-based modeling can simulate such an in-situ sensing-porosity relationship, but it is computationally costly. In this work, we develop Machine Learning (ML) models that can use in-situ thermographic data to predict the micropore of LPBF stainless steel materials. This work considers two identified key features from the thermal histories: the time above the apparent melting threshold (τ) and the maximum radiance (Tmax). These features are computed, stored for each voxel in the built material, and then used as inputs. The binary state of each voxel, either defective or normal, is the output. Different ML models are trained and tested for the binary classification task. In addition to using the thermal features of each voxel to predict its own state, the thermal features of neighboring voxels are also included as inputs. This is shown to improve the prediction accuracy, which is consistent with thermal transport physics around each voxel contributing to its final state. Among the models trained, the F1 scores on test sets reach above 0.96 for Random Forests. Feature importance analysis based on the ML models shows that Tmax is more important to the voxel state than τ. The analysis also finds that the thermal history of the voxels above the present voxel is more influential than those beneath it. Our study significantly extends the capability of using in-situ thermographic data to predict porosity in LPBF materials. Since ML models are fast, they may play integral roles in the optimization and control of such AM technologies.

Machine learning guided adaptive laser power control in selective laser melting for pore reduction

Machine learning–aided real-time detection of keyhole pore generation in laser powder bed fusion

In-layer Thermal Control of a Multi-layer Selective Laser Melting Process

Model predictive control of laser metal deposition

Predicting defects in laser powder bed fusion using in-situ thermal imaging data and machine learning

Machine learning approach towards laser powder bed fusion manufactured AlSi10Mg thin tubes in laser shock peening

A physics-informed machine learning model for porosity analysis in laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

In situ porosity intelligent classification of selective laser melting based on coaxial monitoring and image processing

Part geometry and conduction-based laser power control for powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

Predicting Laser Powder Bed Fusion Defects Through In-Process Monitoring Data and Machine Learning

A Comparative Study of Machine Learning Methods for Computational Modeling of the Selective Laser Melting Additive Manufacturing Process

Linear Active Disturbance Rejection Control for a Laser Powder Bed Fusion Additive Manufacturing Process

Feedback Control of Melt Pool Area in Selective Laser Melting Additive Manufacturing Process

High-fidelity Numerical Model of Melt Pool Dynamics in Selective Multi-Laser Melting of Inconel 718 under Different Scanning Strategies

The causal relationship between melt pool geometry and energy absorption measured in real time during laser-based manufacturing

Dynamics of pore formation during laser powder bed fusion additive manufacturing

A Real-Time Monitoring Method for Selective Laser Melting of TA1 Materials Based on Radiation Detection of a Molten Pool

Model Predictive Control of Melt Pool Size for the Laser Powder Bed Fusion Process Under Process Uncertainty

Batch Model Predictive Control for Selective Laser Melting

Predictions of in-situ melt pool geometric signatures via machine learning techniques for laser metal deposition