Abstract:<p>Urban resettlement projects involve a large number of stakeholders and impose tremendous cost. Developing resettlement plans and reaching an agreement amongst stakeholders about resettlement plans at a reasonable cost are some of the key issues in urban resettlement. From this perspective, urban resettlement is a typical large-scale group decision-making (GDM) problem, which is challenging because of the scale of participants and the requirement of high consensus levels. Observing that residents who are affected by a resettlement project often have tight social connections, this study proposes a framework to improve the consensus reaching and uses the minimum consensus cost to reduce the total cost for urban resettlement projects with more than 1000 participants. Firstly, we construct a network topology that consists of two layers to deal with incomplete social relationships amongst large-scale participants. An inner layer consists of participants whose preference similarities and trust relations are known. Meanwhile, an outside layer includes participants whose trust relations cannot be determined. Secondly, we develop a classification method to classify participants into small subgroups based on their preference similarities. We can then connect the participants whose trust relations are unknown (the outside layer) with the ones in the inner layer using the classification results. To facilitate effective consensus reaching in large-scale social network GDM, we develop a three-step approach to reconcile conflicting preferences and accelerate the consensus process at the minimum cost. A real-life urban resettlement example is used to validate the proposed approach. Results show that the proposed approach can reduce the total consensus cost compared with the other two practices used in the actual urban resettlement operations.</p>

A robust minimum cost consensus model based on social networks considering conflict constraints

A Minimum-Cost Consensus Model in Social Networks Derived From Uncertain Preferences

The minimum cost consensus model considering the implicit trust of opinions similarities in social network group decision‐making

Robust minimum cost consensus modeling with consensus principle and tolerance level for group decision making

Robust Consensus Modeling: Concerning Consensus Fairness and Efficiency with Uncertain Costs

A minimum adjustment consensus framework with compromise limits for social network group decision making under incomplete information

The Robust Cost Consensus Model with Interval-Valued Opinion and Uncertain Cost in Group Decision-Making

The bi-level consensus model with dual social networks for group decision making

Facilitating large-scale group decision-making in social networks: A bi-level consensus model with social influence

A minimum adjustment cost feedback mechanism based consensus model for group decision making under social network with distributed linguistic trust

Reaching a minimum adjustment consensus in social network group decision-making

A maximum satisfaction consensus-based large-scale group decision-making in social network considering limited compromise behavior

Consensus Reaching in Group Decision Making With Linear Uncertain Preferences and Asymmetric Costs

Trust Cop-Kmeans Clustering Analysis and Minimum-Cost Consensus Model Considering Voluntary Trust Loss in Social Network Large-Scale Decision-Making

Opinion Dynamics and Minimum Adjustment-Driven Consensus Model for Multi-Criteria Large-Scale Group Decision Making Under a Novel Social Trust Propagation Mechanism

A two-stage consensus model for large-scale group decision-making considering dynamic social networks

A Consensus Model for Intuitionistic Fuzzy Group Decision-Making Problems Based on the Construction and Propagation of Trust/Distrust Relationships in Social Networks

Punishment-driven consensus reaching model in social network large-scale decision-making with application to social capital selection

An efficient consensus reaching framework for large-scale social network group decision making and its application in urban resettlement

Consensus reaching for social network group decision making by considering leadership and bounded confidence