In–N–In Sites Boosting Interfacial Charge Transfer in Carbon-Coated Hollow Tubular In 2 O 3 /ZnIn 2 S 4 Heterostructure Derived from In-MOF for Enhanced Photocatalytic Hydrogen Evolution

Quan Zhang,Juhua Zhang,Xiaohao Wang,Lingfeng Li,Ye-Fei Li,Wei-Lin Dai
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acscatal.0c05520
IF: 12.9
2021-05-10
ACS Catalysis
Abstract:A hierarchical hollow tubular In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/ZnIn<sub>2</sub>S<sub>4</sub> heterostructure was rationally designed by growing thin-layered ZnIn<sub>2</sub>S<sub>4</sub> on the surface of carbon-coated hollow tubular In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> (C/HT-In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>) that was derived from In-MOF as a photocatalyst for the photocatalytic hydrogen evolution (PHE) reaction. The fast interfacial charge transfer and significantly enhanced PHE activity could be ascribed to the narrowed band gap of C/HT-In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and the inclined formation of the staggered heterostructure between C/HT-In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and ZnIn<sub>2</sub>S<sub>4</sub>. The former was caused by the coordinated In–N–In sites as revealed by EXAFS analysis, while the latter was proved by density functional theory (DFT) calculation. Additionally, the high electronic conduction of carbon for bridging charge separation from C/HT-In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> to ZnIn<sub>2</sub>S<sub>4</sub> further accelerated the protonation process. It was found that the optimum H<sub>2</sub> evolution rate reached 920.5 μmol/m<sup>2</sup> when the mass proportion of counterparts was set at 1:2, about 13.2 and 6.6 times higher than that of pristine C/HT-In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> and ZnIn<sub>2</sub>S<sub>4</sub>, respectively. This work demonstrated the feasibility of establishing coordinated In–N–In sites in the interface of the carbon-coated HT-In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>/ZnIn<sub>2</sub>S<sub>4</sub> heterostructure for boosting charge transfer and introduced an ideal light-activated catalyst for PHE reactions from water.The Supporting Information is available free of charge at <a class="ext-link" href="/doi/10.1021/acscatal.0c05520?goto=supporting-info">https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acscatal.0c05520</a>.Additional details on chemical reagents, materials characterization, theoretical calculation methods; SEM images, TEM images, EDS spectra, mapping profiles; TG and DTG curves; XRD patterns; higher resolution of XPS spectra; EXAFS fitting parameters and results; N<sub>2</sub> adsorption–desorption isotherms; photocatalytic hydrogen production in tap and river water; effect of sacrificial agents on photocatalytic performance; narrowed band gap of C/HT-In<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub> by In–N–In sites; Mott–Schottky plots; Valence-band XPS spectra; schematic illustration of transfer pathways of photogenerated carriers; comparison of photocatalytic hydrogen evolution with reported literatures; summarized data for AQE calculation (<a class="ext-link" href="/doi/suppl/10.1021/acscatal.0c05520/suppl_file/cs0c05520_si_001.pdf">PDF</a>)This article has not yet been cited by other publications.
chemistry, physical
What problem does this paper attempt to address?