Abstract:<h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objective</h3><p>To summarize findings from this Special Issue, which examine reported experiences of discrimination among six underrepresented groups in public opinion research—blacks, Latinos, Native Americans, Asian Americans, lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, or queer (LGBTQ) adults, and women.</p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Data Source and Study Design</h3><p>Data come from a nationally representative, probability‐based telephone survey of 3453 US adults, conducted January—April 2017.</p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>We calculated the percent of adults reporting discrimination in several domains, including health care.</p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Principal Findings</h3><p>In health care encounters, 32 percent of black adults reported discrimination, as did 23 percent of Native Americans, 20 percent of Latinos, 18 percent of women, 16 percent of LGBTQ adults, and 13 percent of Asian Americans. Significant shares also reported experiencing racial, gender, or LGBTQ identity‐based violence against themselves or family members, including 51 percent of LGBTQ adults, 42 percent of blacks, 38 percent of Native Americans, and 21 percent of women. At least one in seven blacks (22 percent), LGBTQ adults (18 percent), Latinos (17 percent), and Native Americans (15 percent) reported avoiding health care for themselves or family members over concerns of anticipated discrimination or unfair treatment.</p><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusions</h3><p>Taken together, this polling effort illustrates the significant and widespread level of discrimination against many groups in America today, as well as the complex manifestation of these experiences across different groups and different areas of life. While it is beyond the scope of these results to make specific recommendations for how to end discrimination in each area of life we studied, this Special Issue provides important evidence that more research and practice on discrimination are sorely needed in health services research.</p>

Is Discrimination Widespread or Concentrated? Evaluating the Distribution of Anti-Black Discrimination in Judicial, Hiring, and Housing Decisions

An Unintentional, Robust, and Replicable Pro-Black Bias in Social Judgment

Can minorities discriminate against majorities? An analysis of academic and ordinary usage

The social patterning of vicarious discrimination: Implications for health equity

Lowering the Playing Field: Discrimination through Sequential Spillover Effects

Judges’ Perceptions of Systemic Racism in the Criminal Justice System

Perceiving Discrimination: Race, Gender, and Sexual Orientation in the Legal Workplace

Perceptions of Anti-Black Bias in the Criminal Justice System Contribute to Pro-Black (Versus White) Bias in Criminal Justice Research

Examining the effectiveness of interventions to reduce discriminatory behavior at work: An attitude dimension consistency perspective

Prejudice and Volatility: A Statistical Framework for Measuring Social Discrimination in Large Language Models

Where Are All the Black Teachers? Discrimination in the Teacher Labor Market

Misclassification among methods used for multiple group discrimination--the effects of distributional properties

The presence of diversity initiatives leads to increased pro-White hiring decisions among conservatives.

The immediate effect of discrimination on mental health: A meta-analytic review of the causal evidence.

Discrimination in the United States: Perspectives for the future

How race influences perceptions of objectivity and hiring preferences

Experienced, Anticipated, and Vicarious Discrimination: Consequences and Resilience for Minority Adolescents’ School Engagement

Quantitative measures of discrimination with application to appointment processes

How Can Debiasing Research Aid Efforts to Reduce Discrimination?

Black-White differences in perceived lifetime discrimination by education and income in the MIDUS Study in the U.S

Rationally Inattentive Statistical Discrimination: Arrow Meets Phelps