Abstract:Introduction Governments around the globe now seek to judge the performance of their public services. This has given rise to the introduction of a range of complex and sophisticated regimes to provide information to politicians, managers and the public on organizational success or failures. Examples include an index of measures of performance of Chinese cities (China Daily 2004), the Comprehensive Performance Assessment in English local government (Audit Commission 2002), the Government Performance Results Act 1992 in the US, the Service Improvement Initiative in Canada, the Putting Service First scheme in Australia, Strategic Results Area Networks in New Zealand, Management by Results in Sweden, and Regulation of Performance Management and Policy Evaluation in the Netherlands (Pollitt and Bouckaert 2004). Researchers have increasingly turned their attention to public service performance (e.g., see the Symposium edition of Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2005 (Boyne and Walker 2005), on the determinants of performance in public organizations). Despite such progress, a persistent problem for public management researchers and practitioners has been the conceptualisation and measurement of performance. Previous research has shown that organizational performance is multifaceted (Boyne 2003; Carter et al . 1992; Quinn and Rohrbaugh 1983; Venkatraman and Ramanujuam 1986). This is because public organizations are required to address a range of goals, some of which may be in conflict. Consequently, public organizations are obliged to focus attention on multiple dimensions of performance. Boyne's (2002) review of these dimensions isolated five conceptual categories – outputs, efficiency, effectiveness, responsiveness and democratic outcomes.

The uninformed budge yet the misinformed buck: performance information and citizen satisfaction

Performance information and learning effects on citizen satisfaction with public services

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND CITIZEN SATISFACTION WITH THE GOVERNMENT: EVIDENCE FROM CHINESE MUNICIPALITIES

Does performance disclosure affect user satisfaction, voice, and exit? Experimental evidence from service users

Bounded rationality, blame avoidance, and political accountability: how performance information influences management quality

Acceptance or Disapproval: Performance Information in the Eyes of Public Frontline Employees

Factors affecting citizen satisfaction: examining from the perspective of the expectancy disconfirmation theory and individual differences

Less Information, More Comparison, and Better Performance: Evidence from a Field Experiment

Is corporate disclosure of environmental performance indicators reliable or biased information? A look at the underlying drivers

Local government performance through the eyes of citizens

Information, Incentives, and Environmental Governance: Evidence from China's Ambient Air Quality Standards

Cutback management strategies and citizen evaluation of government

Public Service Performance: Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration

The role and influencing factors of government performance evaluation: A test of Chinese public officials’ perceptions in Gaoming district

Vanishing Happiness: How Does Pollution Information Disclosure Affect Life Satisfaction?

Pollution matters: The political cost of information disclosure

Information transparency and corporate performance - Evidence from China's multi-tiered capital market system

How firms respond to mandatory information disclosure

Does public participation promote environmental efficiency? Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment of environmental information disclosure in China

Effectiveness, Efficiency and Equity Tradeoffs in Public Programs: A Citizen Experiment

Does environmental information disclosure contribute to improve firm financial performance? An examination of the underlying mechanism