Abstract:Introduction Governments around the globe now seek to judge the performance of their public services. This has given rise to the introduction of a range of complex and sophisticated regimes to provide information to politicians, managers and the public on organizational success or failures. Examples include an index of measures of performance of Chinese cities (China Daily 2004), the Comprehensive Performance Assessment in English local government (Audit Commission 2002), the Government Performance Results Act 1992 in the US, the Service Improvement Initiative in Canada, the Putting Service First scheme in Australia, Strategic Results Area Networks in New Zealand, Management by Results in Sweden, and Regulation of Performance Management and Policy Evaluation in the Netherlands (Pollitt and Bouckaert 2004). Researchers have increasingly turned their attention to public service performance (e.g., see the Symposium edition of Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 2005 (Boyne and Walker 2005), on the determinants of performance in public organizations). Despite such progress, a persistent problem for public management researchers and practitioners has been the conceptualisation and measurement of performance. Previous research has shown that organizational performance is multifaceted (Boyne 2003; Carter et al . 1992; Quinn and Rohrbaugh 1983; Venkatraman and Ramanujuam 1986). This is because public organizations are required to address a range of goals, some of which may be in conflict. Consequently, public organizations are obliged to focus attention on multiple dimensions of performance. Boyne's (2002) review of these dimensions isolated five conceptual categories – outputs, efficiency, effectiveness, responsiveness and democratic outcomes.

Performance information and learning effects on citizen satisfaction with public services

Does performance disclosure affect user satisfaction, voice, and exit? Experimental evidence from service users

PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT AND CITIZEN SATISFACTION WITH THE GOVERNMENT: EVIDENCE FROM CHINESE MUNICIPALITIES

The uninformed budge yet the misinformed buck: performance information and citizen satisfaction

Decentralization, Local Information, and Effort Substitution: Evidence from a Subnational Decentralization Reform in China

Study on the Effectiveness of the Government Portal Website Performance from the User's View

Public Service Motivation and Performance: The Role of Organizational Identification

Local government performance through the eyes of citizens

Quality standards, implementation autonomy, and citizen satisfaction with public services: cross-national evidence

Factors affecting citizen satisfaction: examining from the perspective of the expectancy disconfirmation theory and individual differences

Public Service Performance: Subjective and objective measures of organizational performance: An empirical exploration

Does Performance Management Relate to Good Governance? A Study of Its Relationship with Citizens’ Satisfaction with and Trust in Israeli Local Government

Policy Performance Assessment Based on Policy Awareness:An Empirical Study on Integrated Urban-Rural Employment Promotion Policy in Huzhou,Zhejiang Province

Cutback management strategies and citizen evaluation of government

Citizen–Government Interaction and the Internet: Expectations and Accomplishments in Contact, Quality, and Trust

Digital Governance: An Assessment of Performance and Best Practices

An Evaluation System of Local Government Public Service Quality and its Application

Bounded rationality, blame avoidance, and political accountability: how performance information influences management quality

The role and influencing factors of government performance evaluation: A test of Chinese public officials’ perceptions in Gaoming district

How and When Democratic Values Matter: Challenging the Effectiveness-Centric Framework in Program Evaluation

Exploring the relationship between government budget information and citizens’ perceptions of public service performance in China