Early career insight

Paris C. Papagianis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03034-5

IF: 3.953

2024-02-01

Pediatric Research

Abstract:Pediatric Research, Published online: 31 January 2024; doi:10.1038/s41390-024-03034-5 Early career insight

pediatrics

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Why Pediatric Research needs "Insights"

Olaf Dammann,Cynthia Bearer

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-023-02983-7

IF: 3.953

2024-01-18

Pediatric Research

Abstract:Pediatric Research, Published online: 17 January 2024; doi:10.1038/s41390-023-02983-7 Why Pediatric Research needs "Insights"

pediatrics
Early career investigator biocommentary: Katherine Bline

Katherine E. Bline

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03097-4

IF: 3.953

2024-02-21

Pediatric Research

Abstract:Pediatric Research, Published online: 20 February 2024; doi:10.1038/s41390-024-03097-4 Early career investigator biocommentary: Katherine Bline

pediatrics
Early career investigator biocommentary: Lauren Erdman

Lauren Erdman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03216-1

IF: 3.953

2024-04-24

Pediatric Research

Abstract:Pediatric Research, Published online: 23 April 2024; doi:10.1038/s41390-024-03216-1 Early career investigator biocommentary: Lauren Erdman

pediatrics
Pediatric Research ECI highlight: Matthew S. Pantell

Matthew S. Pantell

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03214-3

IF: 3.953

2024-04-27

Pediatric Research

Abstract:Pediatric Research, Published online: 25 April 2024; doi:10.1038/s41390-024-03214-3 Pediatric Research ECI highlight: Matthew S. Pantell

pediatrics
Including Early Career Researchers in Scientific Publishing

Chen,X.,Gupta,S.,Russo,S.,Sitzia,G.,Westbrook,A.,White,S. R.,for the JNeurosci Early Career Researcher Advisory Board

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0907-24.2024

2024-06-06

Journal of Neuroscience

Abstract:Early career researchers (ECRs)—graduate students, postdoctoral fellows, and early stage independent investigators—represent the largest fraction of researchers in higher education (Friesenhahn and Beaudry, 2014) yet they are also the most vulnerable (Ledford, 2017; Bansal et al., 2022). One area of particular vulnerability and pressure is scientific publishing. ECRs often lack experience in navigating the publishing process independently, as trainees may rely on senior investigators to handle many aspects of the peer review and publishing processes. Additionally, early career investigators are seldom integrated into the core of scientific publishing, creating a gap between journals and the upcoming force of future scientific research. Yet, ECRs have the potential to bring fresh scientific perspectives, giving rise to innovative approaches that can enrich journal content and attract a wider readership. Additionally, their expertise in ... Correspondence should be addressed to Simone Russo at simone.russo.lab{at}gmail.com.

neurosciences
Highlight of 2023: Advances in pediatric immunology

Erika Van Nieuwenhove

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/imcb.12790

2024-06-09

Immunology and Cell Biology

Abstract:In this article for the Highlights of 2023 Series, significant advancements in pediatric immunology are discussed, focusing on new diagnostic and therapeutic approaches. Key studies include the integration of genomic and proteomic profiling for better diagnosis of inborn errors of immunity, the impact of nongenetic factors such as autoantibodies on immune responses, the promising use of Janus kinase inhibitors and chimeric antigen receptor‐T cell therapy for treating immune deficiencies and autoimmune diseases and the potential for a curative approach using prime editing. These developments mark a shift toward personalized and precision medicine in pediatric immunology.

immunology,cell biology
Challenges and opportunities in 2021

Leila Akkari,Stacey D. Finley,Ping-Chih Ho,Misty Jenkins,Barbara B. Maier,Nicholas McGranahan,Miriam Mutebi,Rushika M. Perera,Carla Daniela Robles-Espinoza,Santosha Vardhana,Liling Wan,Meng Michelle Xu

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-021-00294-6

IF: 22.7

2021-01-01

Nature Cancer

Abstract:Twelve early-career investigators share their thoughts on the challenges faced by their teams and communities during the past year, and look ahead to new opportunities for 2022.
Factors influencing the interests, career paths, and research activities of recent graduates from an academic, pediatric residency program.

F. D. Ledley,F. H. Lovejoy

1993-09-01

PEDIATRICS

Abstract:OBJECTIVE This study was undertaken to characterize the professional activity of a cohort of young pediatricians who completed an academically oriented residency program, to analyze factors which influenced their interests, career choices, and research activity, and to understand what steps might be effective in attracting more young physicians into academic and research career paths. METHOD We studied by questionnaire a cohort of 150 pediatric residents from the Children's Hospital in Boston who completed residency training between 1976 and 1981. RESULTS Questionnaires were returned by 117 (78%) of 150 individuals. Of these, 73% were in academic medicine and 37% were in clinical practice. Individuals were engaged in various activities with a mean of 47% effort in clinical care, 25% effort in administration and teaching, and 28% effort in basic or clinical research. The majority of respondents (71 [61%] of 117) reported at least 10% effort in all three activities. Only 9 (8%) of 117 reported no clinical activity, 8 (7%) of 117 reported no teaching or administrative activity, and 35 (30%) of 117 reported no research activity. Few individuals dedicated more than 50% of their time to research, and none reported a 100% commitment to research. Clinical sources provided 71% of all salary support, research grants 17%, government salaries 7%, and other sources 5%. For most respondents, interest in clinical practice predated medical school, whereas interest in research increased during preclinical training, particularly among those who engaged in research activities. Respondents identified previous research experience as the principle factor enhancing their decision and ability to do research. Factors that adversely influenced their decision or ability to do research included salary expectancy, funding, the perceived competitiveness of academic life, administrative duties, and family responsibilities. CONCLUSIONS Efforts to encourage more young physicians to enter academic careers should focus on providing research experience during preclinical training and providing long-term support for research which enables physician scientists to maintain their interest and involvement in clinical medicine.

Medicine
How paediatric drug development and use could benefit from OMICs: A c4c expert group white paper

Eva Neumann,Filippa Schreeck,Jethro Herberg,Evelyne Jacqz Aigrain,Anke H Maitland-van der Zee,Antonio Pérez-Martínez,Daniel B Hawcutt,Elke Schaeffeler,Anders Rane,Saskia N de Wildt,Matthias Schwab

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/bcp.15216

Abstract:The safety and efficacy of pharmacotherapy in children, particularly preterms, neonates and infants, is limited by a paucity of good-quality data from prospective clinical drug trials. A specific challenge is the establishment of valid biomarkers. OMICs technologies may support these efforts by complementary information about targeted and nontargeted molecules through systematic characterization and quantitation of biological samples. OMICs technologies comprise at least genomics, epigenomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics and microbiomics in addition to the patient's phenotype. OMICs technologies are in part hypothesis-generating, allowing an in depth understanding of disease pathophysiology and pharmacological mechanisms. Application of OMICs technologies in paediatrics faces major challenges before routine adoption. First, developmental processes need to be considered, including a subdivision into specific age groups as developmental changes clearly impact OMICs data. Second, compared to the adult population, the number of patients is limited as are the type and amount of necessary biomaterial, especially in neonates and preterms. Thus, advanced trial designs and biostatistical methods, noninvasive biomarkers, innovative biobanking concepts including data and samples from healthy children, as well as analytical approaches (eg liquid biopsies) should be addressed to overcome these obstacles. The ultimate goal is to link OMICs technologies with innovative analysis tools, such as artificial intelligence at an early stage. The use of OMICs data based on a feasible approach will contribute to the identification complex phenotypes and subpopulations of patients to improve the development of medicines for children with potential economic advantages.
In Support of Early-Career Researchers

Rakeshwar Bandichhor,A. S. Borovik,Ana de Bettencourt-Dias,Martin D. Eastgate,Nora S. Radu,Feng Shi,Lisa McElwee-White

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00207

IF: 4.6

2023-02-03

Inorganic Chemistry

Abstract:Inorg Chem . 2023 Feb 2. doi: 10.1021/acs.inorgchem.3c00207. Online ahead of print. NO

chemistry, inorganic & nuclear
Impact of the COVID‐19 Pandemic Onset on the Early Careers of Pediatric Oncology Health Professionals and Researchers: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group Young Investigators Committee, Young SIOP Network, and Young SIOPE

Gemma Bryan,Louise Guolla,Gabriela Inés Villanueva,Sarah Cohen‐Gogo,Alejandra Casanovas,Rina Medina,Gabriel Revon‐Riviere,Hallie Coltin,Lisa S. Kahalley,Janice S. Withycombe,Roelof van Ewijk,Reineke A. Schoot,Thomas Cash,Reto M. Baertschiger,Mary Frances McAleer,Daniel J. Benedetti,Emily Greengard,Carrie L. Kitko,Adam L. Green,Girish Dhall,Adam J. Esbenshade

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/pbc.31419

2024-11-08

Pediatric Blood & Cancer

Abstract:Introduction The COVID‐19 pandemic onset had a global debilitating impact on individuals and on burgeoning careers. In 2021, the Children's Oncology Group Young Investigators Committee, Young SIOP (International Society of Paediatric Oncology) Network, and Young SIOPE (European Society for Paediatric Oncology) co‐sponsored a survey to explore the impacts of the first year of the pandemic on early‐career pediatric oncology professionals with respect to working practices, productivity, professional and career development, personal wellbeing, and changing childcare needs. Methods The survey comprised demographic, multiple‐choice, and free‐text questions, and was distributed via email and social media with English, French, and Spanish versions available. Descriptive statistics and chi‐square tests were used to compare quantitative data by self‐designated gender and country of origin. Qualitative data were described using content analysis. Results Professionals (N = 499, 26.3% male, 77.2% MDs) in 48 countries (77.6% high income) responded in English (79.4%), Spanish (12.4%), and French (8.2%). Respondents had difficulty obtaining and keeping jobs (26.9%), worsened overall academic productivity (50.7%, with higher rates among bench scientists, p

oncology,pediatrics,hematology
The 2022 Generation

Mautin Barry-Hundeyin,Jian Carrot-Zhang,Talya Dayton,Shila Ghazanfar,Lillian M. Guenther,Diu T. T. Nguyen,Jason R. Pitarresi,Sheerien Rajput,Naiara Santana-Codina,Tanaya Shree,Zexian Zeng,Ying Zhang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-022-00481-z

IF: 22.7

2022-01-01

Nature Cancer

Abstract:Twelve early career investigators share experiences from the process of starting their laboratories throughout the past year, and reflect on the challenges faced and the opportunities seized.
Early phase clinical trials in pediatric oncology: Swedish pediatric oncologists' experiences of balancing hope and expectations in life-threatening illnesses

Anna Schröder Håkansson,Ann-Christine Andersson,Jonas Abrahamsson,Margaretha Stenmarker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2024.1395841

2024-08-16

Abstract:Aim: To study Swedish pediatric oncologists' practical and emotional experiences of referring, including and/or treating children in early-phase clinical trials. Methods: A nationwide study was conducted using a mixed-method approach. Structured interviews based on a study-specific questionnaire and participants' personal reflections were utilized. Survey responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics, while participants' comments were analyzed using thematic analysis. All interviews were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Results: In total, 29 physicians with 4 to 32 years of experience in pediatric oncology participated, with 19 (66%) having > 10 years of experience. Three themes appeared: 1) Optimization-based approach focused on finding the most suitable treatment and care for every child with a refractory/relapsed cancer eligible for an early-phase clinical trial; 2) Team-based approach aimed at establishing local and national consensus in decision-making for treatment options, including early-phase clinical trials and palliative care; 3) Family-based approach in which the physicians provided families with actionable information, listened to their desires, and endeavored to maintain hope in challenging circumstances. Several participants (40% with ≤ 10 years of experience and 58% with > 10 years of experience) viewed the early-phase clinical trial as a potential "chance of cure". A majority (80%) of physicians with ≤ 10 years of experience, reported that they often or always felt personally and emotionally affected by communication regarding early-phase clinical trials. Delivering difficult news in cases of uncertain prognosis was identified as the major challenge. None of the study participants felt adequately prepared in terms of sufficient knowledge and experience regarding early-phase clinical trials. The physicians expressed a need for guidance and training in communication to address these challenges. Conclusions: Working with early-phase clinical trials highlight a field where physicians cannot solely rely on their expertise or past experiences, and where they are likely to be deeply emotionally involved. Physicians who care for children eligible for such studies require targeted educational initiatives and supervision.
Career pathways, part 14

Angelika Rambold,Santiago Vernia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s42255-024-01056-1

IF: 19.865

2024-05-31

Nature Metabolism

Abstract:Angelika Rambold and Santiago Vernia reflect on how a very early interest in science has shaped their career, their research interests and their mentoring style.

endocrinology & metabolism
Research capacity and limitations in Canadian paediatric emergency departments: An observational study on biomarker discovery

Elena Mitevska,Beata Mickiewicz,Leslie Boisvert,Christine Bon,Redjana Carciumaru,Ramona Cook,Tyrus Crawford,Joan Dietz,Melanie Doyle,Angela Y Hui,Karly Stillwell,Adriana Trajtman,Darcy Beer,Maala Bhatt,William Craig,Eleanor Fitzpatrick,Jocelyn Gravel,April Kam,Ahmed Mater,Anne Moffat,Naveen Poonai,Vikram Sabhaney,Graham C Thompson

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/pch/pxae023

2024-07-24

Paediatrics & Child Health

Abstract:Abstract Background Paediatric research is essential to acquire effective diagnoses and treatment for children, but it has historically been under-prioritized. The PRIMED study aimed to characterize the bio-profiles of children with appendicitis and investigate their use as a clinical prediction tool. We evaluated the clinical research capacity of several Canadian paediatric emergency departments (EDs) and described both the challenges experienced in the implementation of the PRIMED study and the strategies which were used to improve local research capacity. Methods Eleven paediatric EDs across Canada provided basic demographic and administrative data along with laboratory- and human-resource availability during the PRIMED study enrollment. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. Results Fewer than half of the study sites (5/11, 45%) had access to a laboratory that would process research samples 24 hours per day. Four study sites (36%) only enrolled patients during business hours (8:00–17:00). There was no nighttime coverage for patient enrollment and sample collection. Only three study sites (27%) had enrollment hours that captured over 75% of the potential study participants. Over half of the study sites (6/11, 55%) developed novel processes to enable study success, for example, creating graduate student on-call schedules and hiring bioscience-trained site coordinators to process samples. Interpretation Despite site-specific efforts to overcome resource barriers, the gap in clinical research capacity at academic paediatric EDs remains a significant concern. University research institutes and paediatric hospitals should invest in infrastructure and human resources to increase after-hours research capacity to optimize child health and wellness outcomes.

pediatrics
ECI biocommentary: Samuel J. Gentle

Samuel J. Gentle

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03739-7

IF: 3.953

2024-11-19

Pediatric Research

Abstract:While I once admired the seemingly linear path of my peers, I now have a growing appreciation of my less linear path. Having personally realized the transformative qualities of music, I too wished to similarly impact others through the power of songwriting. My pursuit of medicine occurred halfway through my undergraduate education upon the realization that this field could more tangibly impact others. Refining my focus to pediatrics and later neonatal-perinatal medicine followed my reflexive desire to care for both the sick newborn and the suffering parent. Music continues to provide a restorative role, offering resilience amidst a highly demanding profession. My interest in pulmonary outcomes and bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) first materialized as a clinical passion for ventilatory management fostered by my co-mentor, Dr. Waldemar Carlo. When taking call, I enjoyed spending the nights familiarizing myself with each infants' lung physiology and utilizing bedside cardiorespiratory data to appraise the success of iterative revisions to respiratory management. This exercise culminated in observational research questions related to respiratory care. Dr. Carlo helped me take these questions, formulate a formal research approach, and translate bedside observations into first author manuscripts in Journal of Perinatology 1 related to oxygen saturation targeting practices by providers and in Pediatric Research 2 regarding noninvasive respiratory support strategies in extremely preterm infants that later progressed to a multi-center investigation within the NICHD Neonatal Research Network relating the duration of noninvasive respiratory support exposure to respiratory outcomes. 3

pediatrics
Exploring factors that influence the practice of Open Science by early career health researchers: a mixed methods study

Ksenija Zečević,Catherine Houghton,Chris Noone,Hopin Lee,Karen Matvienko-Sikar,Elaine Toomey

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13119.2

2021-01-18

HRB Open Research

Abstract:Background: There is a growing global movement towards open science and ensuring that health research is more transparent. It is vital that the researchers are adequately prepared for this research environment from early in their careers. However, limited research has been conducted on the barriers and enablers to practicing open science for early career researchers. This study aimed to explore the views, experiences and factors influencing open science practices amongst ECRs working in health research. Methods: Semi-structured individual interviews were conducted with a convenience sample of ECRs working in health research. Participants also completed surveys regarding the factors influencing open science practices. Thematic analysis was used to analyse the qualitative data and descriptive statistical analyses were used to analyse survey data. Results: 14 ECRs participated. Two main themes were identified from interview data; Valuing Open Science and Creating a Culture for Open Science. Within ‘Valuing Open Science’, participants spoke about the conceptualisation of open science to be open across the entire research cycle, and important for producing better and more impactful research for patients and the public. Within ‘Creating a Culture of Open Science’ participants spoke about a number of factors influencing their practice of open science. These included cultural and academic pressures, the positives and negatives of increased accountability and transparency, and the need for more training and supporting resources to facilitate open science practices. Conclusion: ECRs see the importance of open science for beneficially impacting patient and public health but many feel that they are not fully supported to practice open science. Resources and supports including education and training are needed, as are better incentives for open science activities. Crucially, tangible engagement from institutions, funders and researchers is needed to facilitate the development of an open science culture.
A new paradigm in bench to bedside research, with a stop in the dusty pharmaceutical cabinet?

Vivek Balasubramaniam,Lois K. Lee,Joyce R. Javier

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-021-01482-x

IF: 3.953

2021-04-06

Pediatric Research

Abstract:<p>Pediatric Research, Published online: 06 April 2021; <a href="https://www.nature.com/articles/s41390-021-01482-x">doi:10.1038/s41390-021-01482-x</a></p>A new paradigm in bench to bedside research, with a stop in the dusty pharmaceutical cabinet?

pediatrics
Early-career navigation tips

Vivien Marx

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-024-02183-z

IF: 48

2024-02-28

Nature Methods

Abstract:In a group interview, early-career researchers in proteomics share how they plan for the future and navigate divides over methods.

biochemical research methods
ECI biocommentary: Benjamin Frank

Benjamin S. Frank

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41390-024-03314-0

IF: 3.953

2024-06-07

Pediatric Research

Abstract:I grew up in Brooklyn, New York, and got my undergraduate degree in Biology from Brown University in Providence, Rhode Island. After college, I spent a year working under the mentorship of a congenital heart surgeon, Dr. Richard Hopkins, on developing a tissue-engineered heart valve that could be implanted in a child and grow with them into adulthood. In this role, I spent untold hours at the bench in the laboratory but also in the operating room and in clinical conferences seeing first-hand the value of anchoring research questions in clinical medicine and the role of the physician scientist. I then went to medical school at the Weill Cornell Medical College where my clinical rotations cemented my love for caring for children and their families. After graduation I was fortunate to come to Children's Hospital Colorado for my pediatrics residency, pediatric cardiology fellowship, and advanced training in cardiac imaging and pediatric pulmonary hypertension. As I saw modeled both by my first mentor and my current longtime mentor, Dr. Jesse Davidson, the core inspiration for my current work came from a fundamentally clinical question. As a fellow working in the intensive care unit, I cared for numerous infants and children with single ventricle heart disease having one of their staged palliation surgeries. Time and time again their clinical risk stratification metrics would indicate good surgical candidacy but then in the post-operative period, they would struggle. It was clear that the available predictive tools were insufficient, but no better ones existed. Through many conversations, Dr. Davidson and I mapped a plan to leverage the power of metabolomic and proteomic assays and machine learning algorithms to deep phenotype this population in hopes of developing a more precise risk stratification algorithm and potentially identify novel therapeutic targets to improve post-operative and long-term outcomes. Throughout the roller coaster of translational research, I have found myself repeatedly re-anchoring on this approach and re-focusing on the desire to do better by the patients I am working to serve. As a junior physician scientist, it is, of course, necessary to follow the data and research questions where they lead but also to never forget the patients who inspired you to start on the journey.

pediatrics

Early career insight

Why Pediatric Research needs "Insights"

Early career investigator biocommentary: Katherine Bline

Early career investigator biocommentary: Lauren Erdman

Pediatric Research ECI highlight: Matthew S. Pantell

Including Early Career Researchers in Scientific Publishing

Highlight of 2023: Advances in pediatric immunology

Challenges and opportunities in 2021

Factors influencing the interests, career paths, and research activities of recent graduates from an academic, pediatric residency program.

How paediatric drug development and use could benefit from OMICs: A c4c expert group white paper

In Support of Early-Career Researchers

Impact of the COVID‐19 Pandemic Onset on the Early Careers of Pediatric Oncology Health Professionals and Researchers: A Report From the Children's Oncology Group Young Investigators Committee, Young SIOP Network, and Young SIOPE

The 2022 Generation

Early phase clinical trials in pediatric oncology: Swedish pediatric oncologists' experiences of balancing hope and expectations in life-threatening illnesses

Career pathways, part 14

Research capacity and limitations in Canadian paediatric emergency departments: An observational study on biomarker discovery

ECI biocommentary: Samuel J. Gentle

Exploring factors that influence the practice of Open Science by early career health researchers: a mixed methods study

A new paradigm in bench to bedside research, with a stop in the dusty pharmaceutical cabinet?

Early-career navigation tips

ECI biocommentary: Benjamin Frank