H. Afrouzan,S. Zakeri,Akram Abouie Mehrizi,Sara Molasalehi,A. Tahghighi,M. Shokrgozar,A. Es‐haghi,Navid Dinparast Djadid
Abstract:BACKGROUND
Eradication of malaria will depend on discovery of new intervention tools such as anti-malarial drugs. Due to the increasing interest in the application of propolis against significant clinical pathogenic agents, the aim of the present investigation was to evaluate the anti-plasmodial effect of Iranian propolis extracts against chloroquine (CQ)-sensitive Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 and Plasmodium berghei (ANKA strain).
METHODS
Crude samples of honeybee (Apis mellifera) propolis were collected from four provinces in northern (Kalaleh, Golestan), northeastern (Chenaran, Razavi Khorasan), central (Taleghan, Alborz) and western (Morad Beyg, Hamedan) areas of Iran with different types of flora. The dried propolis samples were extracted with three different solvents, including ethanol 70% (EtOH), ethyl acetate (EA) and dichloromethane (DCM).
RESULTS
All extracts were shown to have in vitro anti-plasmodial activity with IC50 ranging from 16.263 to 80.012 µg/mL using parasite lactate dehydrogenase (pLDH) assay. The DCM extract of Morad Beyg propolis indicated the highest anti-plasmodial activity (IC50: 16.263 ± 2.910 μg/mL; P = 0.027, Kruskal-Wallis H-test). The samples were also evaluated in mice for their in vivo anti-plasmodial effect. The curative effect against established infection (Rane test) showed that both extracts at all doses (50, 100, and 200 mg/kgBW) produced anti-plasmodial activity against the parasite. Furthermore, using gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS), the quantity of flavonoids in DCM and EtOH 70% extracts were found to be 7.42% and 3.10%, respectively.
CONCLUSION
The potent anti-plasmodial activity of both EtOH 70% and DCM extracts of the propolis of Morad Beyg, Hamedan suggests further analyses of individual components to assess its utilization as anti-malarial drugs.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is: in mesoscopic silver wires, the energy redistribution mechanism and interaction strength between quasiparticles. Specifically, the researchers experimentally measured the energy distribution function of quasiparticles in silver wires and attempted to understand how the changes in these distribution functions reflect the energy exchange rate between quasiparticles. The core of this problem lies in:
1. **Measurement of quasiparticle energy distribution function**: Measure the quasiparticle energy distribution function in silver diffusion wires connected to two large electrodes ("reservoirs") by tunnel probes.
2. **Inference of energy exchange rate**: Infer the energy exchange rate between quasiparticles from the influence of energy and bias voltage on the distribution function.
3. **Differences in theoretical explanations**: Comparing the results of copper and gold wires, the data of silver wires can be better explained by the theory of diffusive conductors, and may be accompanied by another mechanism, such as coupling with a two - level system.
### Specific problem description
1. **Experimental background and purpose**:
- The researchers measured the energy distribution function of quasiparticles in silver diffusion wires using tunnel probes.
- The purpose is to understand the differences in the interaction strength between quasiparticles and their energy exchange mechanisms in different materials (such as silver, copper, gold).
2. **Experimental method**:
- Use silver wires with a length of 5 µm, 10 µm or 20 µm, and connect large electrodes at both ends.
- Achieve a non - equilibrium state by applying a bias voltage \( U \).
- Measure the differential conductance \( \frac{dI}{dV}(V) \) of the tunnel junction to obtain the quasiparticle energy distribution function \( f(x, E) \).
3. **Key findings**:
- In silver wires, the energy exchange rate between quasiparticles is weaker than that in copper and gold wires, and has a different energy dependence.
- The data of silver wires is closer to the theoretical prediction of Altshuler and Aronov (AA), especially in the case of one - dimensional diffusive media.
- The experimental results show that the interaction in silver wires may involve an additional mechanism, such as coupling with a two - level system.
### Mathematical model and formula
The quasiparticle energy distribution function \( f(x, E) \) satisfies the Boltzmann equation:
\[
\frac{1}{\tau_D} \frac{\partial^2 f(x, E)}{\partial x^2}+I_{\text{coll}}(x, E,\{f\}) = 0
\]
where \( I_{\text{coll}}(x, E,\{f\}) \) is the collision integral caused by the interaction between quasiparticles. The boundary conditions are determined by the electrodes at both ends:
\[
f(0, E)=\left(1+\exp\left(\frac{E}{k_B T}\right)\right)^{-1},\quad f(1, E)=\left(1+\exp\left(\frac{E + eU}{k_B T}\right)\right)^{-1}
\]
In the absence of inelastic scattering, the distribution function \( f_0(x, E) \) is:
\[
f_0(x, E)=(1 - x)f(0, E)+x f(1, E)
\]
The collision term \( I_{\text{coll}}(x, E,\{f\}) \) can be expressed as the difference between the incoming collision term and the outgoing collision term:
\[
I_{\text{coll}}(x, E,\{f\})=I_{\text{in}}^{\text{coll}}(x, E,\{f\})-I_{\text{out}}^{\text{coll}}(x, E,\{f\})
\]
Each collision term can be further expressed as:
\[
I_{\text{in,out}}^{\text{coll}}(x, E,\{f\})=\int d\epsilon dE' K(\epsilon) f_x(E+\epsilon, E)(1 - f_x(E, E-\epsilon)) f_x