Harvey R. Brown,Oliver Pooley
Abstract:The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the `Lorentzian pedagogy' defended by J.S. Bell in his essay ``How to teach special relativity'', and to explore its consistency with Einstein's thinking from 1905 to 1952. Some remarks are also made in this context on Weyl's philosophy of relativity and his 1918 gauge theory. Finally, it is argued that the Lorentzian pedagogy - which stresses the important connection between kinematics and dynamics - clarifies the role of rods and clocks in general relativity.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to evaluate the "Lorentzian pedagogy" defended by J.S. Bell in his paper "How to Teach Special Relativity" and explore its consistency with Einstein's thinking from 1905 to 1952. In addition, the paper also discusses Weyl's philosophy of relativity and his 1918 gauge theory, and emphasizes the importance of the Lorentzian pedagogy in general relativity, especially how it clarifies the roles of rigid rulers and clocks.
### Core problems of the paper:
1. **Evaluation of the Lorentzian pedagogy**: The paper first evaluates the "Lorentzian pedagogy" proposed by J.S. Bell, that is, explaining the phenomena of length contraction and time dilation by the dynamical method, which is very close to the view of H.A. Lorentz.
2. **Consistency with Einstein's thought**: Explore whether the Lorentzian pedagogy is consistent with Einstein's relativistic thought from 1905 to 1952.
3. **Weyl's philosophy of relativity**: Briefly comment on Weyl's philosophy of relativity and his 1918 gauge theory.
4. **The role of the Lorentzian pedagogy in general relativity**: Demonstrate how the Lorentzian pedagogy clarifies the roles of rigid rulers and clocks in general relativity, especially their dynamic properties as structures.
### Main viewpoints:
- **Advantages of the Lorentzian pedagogy**: The Lorentzian pedagogy emphasizes the dynamical effects of moving objects, such as length contraction and time dilation, and these effects can be explained by specific dynamical models. This is different from Einstein's principle of relativity, which focuses more on phenomenological assumptions.
- **Entanglement of dynamics and kinematics**: The paper points out that in relativity, kinematics and dynamics are inseparable. The Lorentzian pedagogy explains these effects by the dynamical method, thus better understanding the dynamic behaviors of rulers and clocks.
- **Complexity of rulers and clocks**: The paper emphasizes the nature of rulers and clocks as complex structures, rather than simple idealized tools. This complexity is especially important in general relativity because they are used to measure the metric structure of spacetime.
### Conclusion:
The paper believes that the Lorentzian pedagogy not only helps to understand the kinematic effects in special relativity, but also better explains the behaviors of rulers and clocks in general relativity. Through the dynamical method, the Lorentzian pedagogy provides a more in - depth understanding, rather than just based on phenomenological assumptions.
### Examples of formulas:
- **Lorentz transformation**:
\[
x'=\gamma(x - vt)
\]
\[
t'=\gamma\left(t-\frac{vx}{c^{2}}\right)
\]
where \(\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}}\) is the Lorentz factor.
- **Length contraction**:
\[
L' = L\sqrt{1-\frac{v^{2}}{c^{2}}}
\]
- **Time dilation**:
\[
\Delta t'=\gamma\Delta t
\]
These formulas are used in the paper to explain and verify the dynamical effects in the Lorentzian pedagogy.