J. Reignier
Abstract:Special relativity was discovered at the eve of the century, but finds its roots in the 19th century efforts to understand the optics and electromagnetism of moving bodies. These roots are reviewed in Parts 1 and 2, the latter being specially devoted to the works of Lorentz and of Poincare up to 1904. Part 3 contains a detailed comparison of the works of Einstein and of Poincare in 1905. It is shown that both authors succeeded in constructing a coherent and fully relativistic theory, although their ideas about the ether were radically different. In Part 4, the question of the respective merits of the three potential fathers of special relativity (i.e. Lorentz, Poincare, Einstein) is discussed again, at the light of the preceding analysis and of the "post-1905" developments of the theory.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is the divergence in historical explanations and understandings regarding the birth of the special theory of relativity. Specifically, the author Jean Reignier tries to explore and analyze the contributions of different scientists (especially Lorentz, Poincaré, and Einstein) and their interrelationships during the transition from classical physics to relativity in physics from the end of the 19th century to the beginning of the 20th century. The paper aims to clarify the following points:
1. **Historical Background**: At the end of the 19th century, physics faced two major changes: the introduction of the concept of quantization and the birth of the theory of relativity. The theory of relativity has profoundly changed people's understanding of space and time, but there are many controversies in its historical development process.
2. **Contributions of Lorentz and Poincaré**: The paper discusses in detail the roles of Lorentz and Poincaré in the development of the theory of relativity. Although Einstein's 1905 paper is generally regarded as the starting point of the special theory of relativity, Lorentz and Poincaré had already done a lot of important work before that, including the Lorentz transformation and the concept of local time.
3. **Diversity of Historical Interpretations**: Different historians have different views on the birth of the theory of relativity. For example, some scholars believe that the work of Lorentz and Poincaré only provided mathematical tools for Einstein's theory without truly understanding the essence of the theory of relativity; other scholars believe that the contributions of Lorentz and Poincaré are equally important and may have even proposed similar ideas prior to Einstein.
4. **Unified Viewpoint**: The author attempts to propose a more comprehensive and objective view through detailed historical analysis, that is, the development of the special theory of relativity is a multi - stage process involving the contributions of multiple scientists. He advocates referring to the special theory of relativity as the "Lorentz - Poincaré - Einstein theory of relativity".
### Formula Display
Some important formulas mentioned in the paper include:
- **Lorentz Transformation**:
\[
x' = \gamma (x - vt), \quad y' = y, \quad z' = z, \quad t' = \gamma \left( t - \frac{vx}{c^2} \right)
\]
where \(\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}\) is the Lorentz factor.
- **Local Time**:
\[
t' = t - \frac{vx}{c^2}
\]
- **Correspondence Theorem**:
\[
E'_{x'} = E_x, \quad E'_{y'} = E_y - \frac{v}{c} H_z, \quad E'_{z'} = E_z + \frac{v}{c} H_y
\]
\[
H'_{x'} = H_x, \quad H'_{y'} = H_y + \frac{v}{c} E_z, \quad H'_{z'} = H_z - \frac{v}{c} E_y
\]
Through these formulas and detailed analysis, the author hopes to provide a more comprehensive and accurate historical perspective to help readers better understand the birth and development process of the special theory of relativity.