CD02 What is the relevance of epoxy resin in the baseline series?
Peter Phillips,Preshita Divekar
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjd/ljae090.181
IF: 11.113
2024-06-28
British Journal of Dermatology
Abstract:Abstract Epoxy resin is used widely in adhesives, aircraft construction, boatbuilding, flooring and electrical encapsulation. It has been largely an occupational sensitizer in men. There have been recent reports of nonoccupational sensitization in women, due to exposure to crafting materials (Dios-Guillán V, Matellanes-Palacios M, Bou-Boluda L et al. Non-occupational, recreational epoxy resin contact allergy: report of two cases. Contact Dermatitis 2021; 85: 257–9) and the modern trend of ‘cosplaying’ (Samaran Q, Strizzolo R, Dereure O, Raison-Peyron N. Non-occupational allergic contact dermatitis to epoxy resin in a cosplayer. Contact Dermatitis 2023; 89: 122–4). We reviewed our patch test database for the 13-year period between 2009 and 2022, to identify patients with positive reactions to 1% epoxy resin tested routinely in the British Society for Cutaneous Allergy baseline series. Most patients had also been patch tested to at least one or two extended series including epoxy series. In total, 2445 patients (1701 female, 744 male) had been tested to epoxy resin. Fifteen patients (0.6%) (mean age 59.8 years, range 23–84) had tested positive (nine male, 1.2%; six female, 0.4%). The grade of reaction was +++ in two, ++ in eight and + in five. Of the fifteen, four were also sensitized to bisphenol F, two to 1,6-hexanediol diglycidyl ether and one each to BIS-GMA, 2-phenylglycidyl ether, triethylenetetramine, 1,4-butanediol diglycidyl ether, and phenol formaldehyde resin. Ten had dermatitis of the hands and/or forearms; four had involvement of the head and neck. The mean duration of dermatitis was 42 months (range 2–180). Eight had a history of atopy. Nine patients had known current or previous exposure to epoxy resins, four of whom had ongoing relevant exposure. Seven had occupational exposure (five male, two female). Two worked in boatbuilding or repair (wooden boatbuilder and boat painter), two in construction (decking builder and engineer) and two in art, and one was a lighthouse keeper and airport ground worker. An eighth patient had possible occupational exposure in gardening and a ninth had reacted to dental restorations. Both of the occupationally sensitized women had been exposed as artists working with epoxy resins. Relevance was unknown in six. The predominance of men in this audit is in accordance with previous publications. We found no patient of either sex sensitized through use of crafting kits. We could see no trend towards a reduction in the prevalence of sensitization to epoxy resin during this time period, nor a change in clinical relevance. The sensitization rate of 0.6% in unselected patients (1.2% male, 0.4% female) suggests that epoxy resin remains a relevant allergen, and we recommend that it remain in the baseline patch test series.
dermatology