Calculation of Electroproduction to NNLO and Precision Determination of $α_s$

J. Santiago,F. J. Yndurain
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0550-3213%2899%2900441-1
1999-08-25
Abstract:We use the known values of the two loop Wilson coefficients and the three loop anomalous dimension matrix $\gamma(n)$ to perform a next-to-next-to leading order (NNLO) calculation of $ep$ deep inelastic scattering. Because $\gamma(n)$ is only known for a few values of $n$, the method of average reconstruction has to be used, which leaves 102 effective experimental points, for 12 parameters: the QCD mass $\Lambda$, and 11 initial values for the moments of the structure functions. The data points spread in the range of momenta $2.5 GeV^2\leq Q^2\leq 230 GeV^2$. The chi/dof decreases substantially when going from LO to NLO, and also from NLO to NNLO (although only a little now) to $\chi/dof=79.2/(102-12)$. The favoured value of $\Lambda$ is $$\Lambda(n_f=4,3 {\rm loop})=282.7\pm35.1 MeV,$$ corresponding to the value of the coupling at the Z mass of $$\alpha^{(\rm 3 loop)}_s(M_Z^2)=0.1172\pm0.0024. $$ The calculation, which constitutes a very precise test of QCD, includes target mass corrections; the error takes into account experimental errors and higher twist effects among other estimated theoretical errors.
High Energy Physics - Phenomenology
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
### What problem does this paper attempt to solve? This paper aims to accurately determine the strong coupling constant \(\alpha_s\) through Next - to - Next - to - Leading Order (NNLO) calculations. Specifically, the author uses the known two - loop Wilson coefficients and the three - loop anomalous dimension matrix \(\gamma(n)\) to perform NNLO calculations for electron - proton deep inelastic scattering (epDIS). #### Main problems include: 1. **Improve calculation accuracy**: By introducing higher - order QCD corrections (from LO to NLO and then to NNLO), gradually improve the agreement between theoretical calculations and experimental data. The paper points out that from LO to NLO and from NLO to NNLO, \(\chi^2/\text{d.o.f.}\) decreases significantly. In particular, at NNLO, \(\chi^2/\text{d.o.f.}=79.2/(102 - 12)\). 2. **Improve the calculation of structure functions**: Considering that previous studies only considered non - singular part structure functions (such as \(xF_3\)), this paper extends to include singular part structure functions (such as \(F_2\)). This allows the use of a wider range of experimental data, including SLAC, HERA, and some intermediate - energy muon - production data, thus covering a larger \(Q^2\) range (\(2.5 \, \text{GeV}^2\leq Q^2\leq230 \, \text{GeV}^2\)). 3. **Reduce systematic errors**: In order to reduce the unknown systematic errors caused by interpolation and extrapolation, the author adopts the Bernstein polynomial method to directly average near the experimental data points, avoiding interpolation of theoretical values and reducing the inherent errors in experimental inputs. 4. **Determine QCD parameters**: Through these high - precision calculations, the author obtains very accurate QCD coupling constants and mass parameters: - Strong coupling constant: \(\alpha_s(M_Z^2)=0.1172\pm0.0024\) - QCD mass parameter: \(\Lambda_{\text{nf}=4,3 \text{loop}} = 282.7\pm35.1 \, \text{MeV}\) In summary, the main purpose of this paper is to verify the QCD theory through high - precision NNLO calculations and provide a very accurate measurement of the strong coupling constant \(\alpha_s\).