Abstract:A benchmark ab initio and density functional (DFT) study has been carried out on the electron affinities of the first- and second-row atoms. The ab initio study involves basis sets of $spdfgh$ and $spdfghi$ quality, extrapolations to the 1-particle basis set limit, and a combination of the CCSD(T), CCSDT, and full CI electron correlation methods. Scalar relativistic and spin-orbit coupling effects were taken into account. On average, the best ab initio results agree to better than 0.001 eV with the most recent experimental results. Correcting for imperfections in the CCSD(T) method improves the mean absolute error by an order of magnitude, while for accurate results on the second-row atoms inclusion of relativistic corrections is essential. The latter are significantly overestimated at the SCF level; for accurate spin-orbit splitting constants of second-row atoms inclusion of (2s,2p) correlation is essential. In the DFT calculations it is found that results for the 1st-row atoms are very sensitive to the exchange functional, while those for second-row atoms are rather more sensitive to the correlation functional. While the LYP correlation functional works best for first-row atoms, its PW91 counterpart appears to be preferable for second-row atoms. Among ``pure DFT'' (nonhybrid) functionals, G96PW91 (Gill 1996 exchange combined with Perdew-Wang 1991 correlation) puts in the best overall performance. The best results overall are obtained with the 1-parameter hybrid modified Perdew-Wang (mPW1) exchange functionals of Adamo and Barone [J. Chem. Phys. {\bf 108}, 664 (1998)], with mPW1LYP yielding the best results for first-row, and mPW1PW91 for second-row atoms. Indications exist that a hybrid of the type $a$ mPW1LYP + $(1-a)$ mPW1PW91 yields better results than either of the constituent functionals.

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

The problem that this paper attempts to solve is to accurately predict the electron affinities (EA) of first - and second - period elements through benchmark ab initio and Density Functional Theory (DFT) calculations. Specifically, the research aims to: 1. **Verify whether the current state - of - the - art wave function methods can consistently give "the right reasons leading to the right results"**: This involves using high - precision ab initio methods to evaluate electron affinities and ensuring that these methods are reliable when dealing with related problems. 2. **Test the performance and basis - set dependence of different exchange - correlation functionals in calculating these electron affinities**: This includes evaluating the performance of various pure DFT functionals and hybrid functionals to determine which functionals can provide the most accurate results. ### Research Background Electron affinity refers to the energy required for a system to absorb an electron, that is, the reaction: \[ A + e^- \rightarrow A^- \] Since electron affinity involves changes in the number of valence electrons and significant changes in the spatial range of the wave function, it has always been one of the most challenging properties in quantum - chemical calculations. In particular, for first - and second - period elements, very accurate electron affinity data have been obtained experimentally, making them ideal benchmarks for testing theoretical methods. ### Research Methods #### Ab initio Methods - Multiple advanced ab initio methods were used, such as the coupled - cluster methods (CCSD(T), CCSDT), combined with scalar relativistic effects and spin - orbit coupling effects. - In terms of basis sets, the aug - cc - pVnZ series of basis sets were used and extrapolated to the single - particle basis - set limit. #### Density Functional Theory Methods - Multiple exchange - correlation functionals were tested, including LDA, GGA, hybrid functionals, etc. - A detailed comparison was made of different functionals to evaluate their performance in calculating electron affinities. ### Main Findings - **Ab initio Results**: The study found that the best ab initio results had an average error of less than 0.001 eV compared to the latest experimental results. Correcting the imperfections in the CCSD(T) method can reduce the mean absolute error by an order of magnitude. For second - period elements, including relativistic corrections is crucial. - **DFT Results**: For first - period elements, the LYP correlation functional performed best; for second - period elements, the PW91 correlation functional performed better. Among the pure DFT functionals, G96PW91 had the best overall performance and was even slightly better than the popular B3LYP hybrid functional. Recently proposed single - parameter hybrid functionals (such as mPW1LYP and mPW1PW91) also performed well in some cases. ### Conclusion This study not only provides an important reference for high - precision calculations of electron affinities but also provides a basis for further improving and selecting appropriate DFT functionals. By comparing the results of ab initio and DFT methods, the study shows the advantages and limitations of different methods and provides valuable guidance for future theoretical research.

Electron affinities of the first- and second- row atoms: benchmark ab initio and density functional calculations

Electron affinities of the first‐row atoms revisited. Systematic basis sets and wave functions

Ab Initio Electron Propagators with an Hermitian, Intermediately Normalized Superoperator Metric Applied to Vertical Electron Affinities

Ab Initio Calculation of Coupling-Constant Averaged Exchange-Correlation Holes for Spherically Symmetric Atoms

Density Functional Calculations On First-Row Transition Metals

Performance of Some Density Functional Methods in the Prediction of the Adiabatic Electron Affinities

Calculations of ionization energies and electron affinities for atoms and molecules: A comparative study with different methods

Tests of second-generation and third-generation density functionals for thermochemical kineticsElectronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Mean errors for pure and hybrid DFT methods. See http://www.rsc.org/suppdata/cp/b3/b316260e/

Assessment of W1 and W2 theories for the computation of electron affinities, ionization potentials, heats of formation, and proton affinities

Big data benchmarking: how do DFT methods across the rungs of Jacob's ladder perform for a dataset of 122k CCSD(T) total atomization energies?

Numerical Examination of Performance of Some Exchange-Correlation Functionals for Molecules Containing Heavy Elements

Resolution-of-identity approach to Hartree–Fock, hybrid density functionals, RPA, MP2 and GW with numeric atom-centered orbital basis functions

A consistent and accurate ab initio parametrization of density functional dispersion correction (DFT-D) for the 94 elements H-Pu.

Push it to the limit: Characterizing the convergence of common sequences of basis sets for intermolecular interactions as described by density functional theory

Ionization Potentials and Fundamental Gaps in Atomic Systems from the Ensemble-DFT Approach

Benchmarking Density Functionals on Structural Parameters of Small-/Medium-Sized Organic Molecules.

Performance of Effective Core Potentials for Density Functional Calculations on 3d Transition Metals.

The Perdew–Burke–Ernzerhof exchange-correlation functional applied to the G2-1 test set using a plane-wave basis set

The Extended Perdew-Burke-Ernzerhof Functional With Improved Accuracy For Thermodynamic And Electronic Properties Of Molecular Systems

HAB79: A new molecular dataset for benchmarking DFT and DFTB electronic couplings against high-level ab initio calculations

Implementation and benchmark of a long-range corrected functional in the density functional based tight-binding method