Roles of photosynthetic, respiratory, stomatal and phenological acclimation in controlling carbon and water fluxes of mature Norway spruce in a changing climate

Marianne Hall,R. Duursma,L. Tarvainen,Thomas B. Hasper,B. Medlyn,Shubhangi Lamba,G. Wallin,J. Uddling,S. Linder,B. Sigurdsson
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/egusphere-egu21-15118
2021-03-03
Abstract:<p>Boreal regions are undergoing rapid climate change but our understanding of the long-term consequences for forest processes is hampered by limited knowledge of how trees acclimate to rising atmospheric CO<sub>2</sub> concentrations and temperature. This study used the detailed canopy flux model MAESTRA to simulate the effects of elevated CO<sub>2</sub> (eCO<sub>2</sub>) and warming on net photosynthesis (<em>A</em><sub>n</sub>) and transpiration (<em>E</em>) of mature boreal Norway spruce, investigating how these effects are influenced by the observed acclimation of photosynthetic capacity, respiration, stomatal behavior, and phenology. Without any type of acclimation, eCO<sub>2</sub> increased shoot and crown <em>A</em><sub>n</sub> during the non-frost growing season by 23-44%, while warming only had a minor effect (&#177;2%). Photosynthetic downregulation greatly decreased the positive effect under eCO<sub>2</sub>. Under warming, both stomatal and phenological acclimation had substantial effects on <em>A</em><sub>n</sub> but in opposite directions. Transpiration at shoot and crown level was greatly decreased (23-50%) by eCO<sub>2</sub> and increased by warming (27-42%) in the absence of acclimation. However, both these effects were largely cancelled by stomatal acclimation. Effects of eCO<sub>2</sub> on <em>A</em><sub>n</sub> were generally smaller at entire crown compared to shoot level, as a result of photosynthetic stimulation being smaller in shaded canopy positions. In addition, upregulation of respiration in eCO<sub>2</sub> had a considerably larger negative effect on <em>A</em><sub>n</sub> at crown compared to shoot level. Overall, tree physiological acclimation generally acted to dampen non-acclimated responses. We conclude that photosynthetic and respiratory acclimation greatly reduce the positive effect of eCO<sub>2</sub> on tree CO<sub>2</sub> assimilation, while stomatal and phenological acclimation are crucial for annual water consumption under warming. These results highlight the critical need to account for acclimation in models.</p><p>&#160;</p>
Environmental Science
What problem does this paper attempt to address?