Sodium alginate- and chitosan-based hydrogels with different network charges for selective removal of cationic and anionic dyes from water

Parisa Moharrami,Sajjad Hazrati,Fateh Shakeri,Elaheh Motamedi,Shohreh Ariaeenejad

DOI: https://doi.org/10.2166/wqrj.2024.008

2024-09-23

Water Quality Research Journal

Abstract:ABSTRACT The grafting of chitosan (CH) and sodium alginate (SA) biopolymers with glycidyl methacrylate (GMA) and acrylamide (AAm) monomers and their incorporation with graphene oxide (GO) resulted in the formation of bio-based hydrogels. The hydrogels were referred to as CH–GO–hydrogel (GO/CH-g-poly(AAm-co-GMA)), CH–GO–hydrogel (CH-g-poly (AAm-co-GMA)), SA–GO–hydrogel (GO/SA-g-poly(AAm-co-GMA)), and SA–hydrogel (SA-g-poly(AAm-co-GMA)), and were used as effective/selective dye adsorbents. While the chitosan-based samples displayed positive charges between +27.5 and +0.1 mV, the zeta potential values of alginate-based samples were all negative and changed from −10.4 to −41.7 mV, both in a pH ranges between 3.0 and 9.0. A reduction in swelling properties was observed for both hydrogels after adding GO nano-filler in the matrix (WA values for SA–GO–hydrogel and SA–hydrogel were 10.1, and 22.2 g/g, respectively). The proficiency and selectivity of the samples were confirmed in removing two model dyes: crystal violet (a cationic dye) and Congo red (an anionic dye). Various factors such as adsorbent dosage, initial pH, dye concentration, shaking time, and temperature were examined to determine dye sorption capacities. Pristine hydrogels, without GO, performed better than their nanocomposites. qm values for crystal violet and Congo red with SA–hydrogel, SA–GO–hydrogel, CH–hydrogel, and CH–GO–hydrogel were 909.1, 714.3, 454.5, and 400.0 mg/g, respectively.

water resources