Abstract:Writing quality is dependent upon the organization and sequencing of cognitive processes during writing. College students need writing-strategy advice that is tailored to their individual needs and is cognizant of their already-established writing processes. However, there is an obstacle to providing such advice: Both writing instructors and the writers lack awareness of the moment-by-moment actions by which text was produced. This is because switching between the processes of defining the task, coming up with ideas, outputting text, evaluating, and revising is largely regulated implicitly. To address this shortcoming, the present study uses a design-based research approach to develop and evaluate a minimally viable prototype of a system called "ProWrite" that uses novel biometric technology (concurrent keystroke logging and eye tracking) for providing real-time, individualized, automated, process-focused feedback to writers. This feedback is grounded in the analysis of each writer's individual needs and is presented in the context of a learning cycle consisting of an initial diagnostic, an intervention assignment, and a final follow-up. In two iterations, eight students used the system. Effects on student behavior were determined through direct analysis of biometric writing-process data before and after remediation and through changes in writing-process and written-product measures. Semi-structured interviews revealed that students generally considered the system useful, and they would try to use the newly learned strategies in their future writing experiences. The study demonstrated that individualized, real-time feedback informed by biometric technology can effectively modify writers' processes when writing takes place.

Process Intervention: Teacher Response and Student Writing

The student, the text, and the classroom context: A case study of teacher response

Teaching writing to ESL graduate students: A model and an illustration

Does a Process-Genre Approach Help Improve Students’ Argumentative Writing in English as a Foreign Language? Findings From an Intervention Study

Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications

Automating individualized, process-focused writing instruction: A design-based research study

Promoting student engagement with teacher feedback through rebuttal writing

Research: “It Doesn’t Feel Like a Conversation”: Digital Field Experiences and Preservice Teachers’ Conceptions of Writing Response

Discussion on the Application of Process Teaching Method in High School English Writing Teaching

Writing intervention with elementary students struggling with writing: examining approach profiles to the teacher feedback on writing quality and motivational variables

Write, talk and rewrite: the effectiveness of a dialogic writing intervention in upper elementary education

Reverse Engineering the Initial Steps of the Writing Process for Students with Learning Disabilities

Using "process Approach" in Teaching Writing in Chinese

Speaking out of turn? Taking the initiative in teacher-fronted classroom interaction

Focusing on Process:A Natural Shift in Modern Translation Teaching——A Theoretical Exploration of Process-oriented Translation Teaching and Its Pedagogical Implications

Following the Child, Socioanalysis, and Threats to Community: Teacher Response to Children's Texts

Individualized Writing Instruction in America: A Review of the Recent Literature.

Towards active processes for teaching and learning

Feedback on feedback: Assessing learner receptivity to teacher response in L2 composing

Developing teacher feedback literacy through self-study: Exploring written commentary in a critical language writing curriculum

Effective Interfaces for Student-Driven Revision Sessions for Argumentative Writing