Abstract:Research Question/Issue We examine the association between foreign institutional ownership and climate change disclosure quality from 2006 to 2018 across 34 countries. We find that firms with a higher level of foreign institutional ownership demonstrate better quality climate change disclosures, whereas domestic institutional ownership has immaterial impacts on such disclosures. We utilize a difference‐in‐differences (DiD) analysis using a firm's addition to the Morgan Stanley Capital International (MSCI) index as an exogenous shock to control for endogeneity. Our findings are robust to various other endogeneity controls. We also establish evidence on an indirect effect of climate change disclosure quality in mediating the positive association between foreign institutional investors and firm valuation. Research Findings/Insights We find that the positive association between foreign institutional ownership and climate change disclosure quality is more pronounced for (1) firms domiciled in stakeholder‐orientated countries, (2) firms domiciled in countries that adopt emission trading schemes, and (3) firms with a greater level of information asymmetry. Additionally, our results are more robust when foreign investors are domiciled in countries that care more about the environment. Theoretical/Academic Implications Our study contributes to climate change disclosures, corporate governance, and international business literature by showing that foreign rather than domestic institutional investors contribute to improved corporate climate change disclosure quality in their portfolio firms. Practitioner/Policy Implications Our study urges regulators to increase their market oversight, especially in firms with less foreign institutional ownership. This is required because such firms are prone to exhibiting poorer accountability for their climate risk management practices, and their disclosures are bereft of effective external monitoring mechanisms.

Human capital disclosures and institutional ownership

Institutional Dual-Holders and Corporate Disclosures: A Natural Experiment

Ownership, Incentives and Monitoring

Human Capital Driven Acquisition: Evidence from the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine

Institutional Investor Attention and Firm Disclosure

Foreign institutional ownership and corporate labor investment

Institutional investors and cost of capital: The moderating effect of ownership structure

The Effect of Institutional Ownership on Firm Transparency and Information Production

Stock Performance and Intermediation Changes Surrounding Sustained Increases in Disclosure

Watchful Eye or Just a Veil? Common Institutional Ownership and Environmental Information Disclosure Quality

The effect of voluntary disclosure, ownership structure and proprietary cost on the return–future earnings relation

Do foreign institutional investors influence corporate climate change disclosure quality? International evidence

Institutional Ownership and Corporate Philanthropic Giving in an Emerging Economy

Why Do Group Incentives Work ? Employee Ownership and Specific Human Capital Investment 1

Institutional Cross-Ownership and Corporate Strategy: The Case of Mergers and Acquisitions

The effect of ownership structure on firm performance: Additional evidence

Institutional ownership, product market competition, and earnings management: Some evidence from international data

Institutional ownership and earnings quality: Evidence from China

Managerial ownership and labor income share

Examining the influence of institutional investors on the readability of environmental disclosure in CSR reports of Chinese listed firms

The effects of institutional investor objectives on firm valuation and governance