Harnessing the power of infection prevention and public health data systems to support health care in Washington State during the COVID-19 pandemic

Melissa Feskin,Trenton MacAllister,Elli Moon,Lisa Hannah,Sabine Meuse,Melissa Polomis,Sara Podczervinski
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2024.06.025
IF: 4.303
2024-07-20
American Journal of Infection Control
Abstract:Background State health departments' (SHD) role in infection prevention and control (IPC) includes robust educational and consultative services for various health care settings. During the COVID-19 pandemic, Washington-SHD (W-SHD) IPC staff conducted remote and on-site Infection Control Assessment and Response (ICAR) consultations for long-term care (LTC) and non-LTC health care facilities. Methods ICAR consultations were classified as "reactive" in response to a COVID-19 outbreak or "proactive" to help facilities improve IPC protocols. Facility addresses were geocoded to census tracks, classifying urban or rural areas. Facility types and characteristics were analyzed, assessing the impacts of repeat visits. All descriptive statistics, Pearson's χ 2 tests, and odds ratios were calculated. Results Between March 2020 and December 2022, W-SHD conducted 3,093 ICARs at 1,703 health care facilities in 94.9% (37/39) of Washington counties. Of the total visits, most were in LTC (90.5%) and 48.9% were reactive. Facilities with initial on-site ICARs had 1.5 times the odds of having a repeat visit than facilities with initial remote visit (95% CI: 1.21, 1.87). Discussion Maintaining strong connections with health care facilities can help bolster infection prevention practices and minimize loss of information at the facility level. Conclusions Evidence-based findings on the sustainability of the W-SHD's ICAR services during the COVID-19 pandemic illustrated the value of public health IPC programs.
infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health
What problem does this paper attempt to address?