Infection Preventionists' Current and Preferred Training Strategies and Tools
Terri Rebmann,Charlesnika Evans,Ashley M. Hughes,Rachel L. Mazzara,Kaeli A. Lugo,Jessica Waechter,Shay Drummond,Amanda Carnes,Abigail L. Carlson,Janet Glowicz
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2024.08.015
IF: 4.303
2024-08-27
American Journal of Infection Control
Abstract:Background Educating healthcare staff on infection prevention and control (IPC) is an essential role of infection preventionists (IP), but the COVID-19 pandemic diverted resources away from IPC education. This study's purpose was to conduct an assessment of current IPC training needs. Methods Association for Professionals in Infection Control and Epidemiology members were invited to complete an online survey in May - June, 2023 to assess their current and preferred approaches and tools for training healthcare personnel on IPC. Vendors, retirees, APIC staff, or those not working in a healthcare setting or public health were excluded. Results In all, 2,432 IPs participated. IPs were more likely to report engaging in impromptu healthcare worker training (i.e., just-in-time teaching and team huddles) versus planned educational activities (i.e., learning modules, formal presentations, train-the-trainer, or simulation; KW=288, p <.001). IPs' top preferred teaching methodologies included simulation or interactive activity and their lowest preferred approach was independent learning modules. IPC training apps were the most frequently requested technology. Discussion IPs ranked simulation as their top preferred teaching method; however, simulation was one of the least frequently used approaches. IP education should include strategies for delivering effective impromptu training and how to develop and implement interactive simulation-based education. Conclusions The expressed needs and preferences of IPs should be considered when developing IPC-related teaching and training tools.
infectious diseases,public, environmental & occupational health