Abstract:Extensive literature probes labor market discrimination through correspondence studies in which researchers send pairs of resumes to employers, which are closely matched except for social signals such as gender or ethnicity. Upon perceiving these signals, individuals quickly activate associated stereotypes. The Stereotype Content Model (SCM; Fiske 2002) categorizes these stereotypes into two dimensions: warmth and competence. Our research integrates findings from correspondence studies with theories of social psychology, asking: Can discrimination between social groups, measured through employer callback disparities, be predicted by warmth and competence perceptions of social signals? We collect callback rates from 21 published correspondence studies, varying for 592 social signals. On those social signals, we collected warmth and competence perceptions from an independent group of online raters. We found that social perception predicts callback disparities for studies varying race and gender, which are indirectly signaled by names on these resumes. Yet, for studies adjusting other categories like sexuality and disability, the influence of social perception on callbacks is inconsistent. For instance, a more favorable perception of signals like parenthood does not consistently lead to increased callbacks, underscoring the necessity for further research. Our research offers pivotal strategies to address labor market discrimination in practice. Leveraging the warmth and competence framework allows for the predictive identification of bias against specific groups without extensive correspondence studies. By distilling hiring discrimination into these two dimensions, we not only facilitate the development of decision support systems for hiring managers but also equip computer scientists with a foundational framework for debiasing Large Language Models and other methods that are increasingly employed in hiring processes.

Tempus Fugit: Unraveling Temporal Occurrence and Display Order Effects of Online Information on Employer Impressions

Oblivion of Online Reputation: How Time Cues Improve Online Recruitment

Social Class Differences in Job Search Process and Employment Success

Social media and recruitment: examining (counter) productive diversity messages

Fairness in E-Recruitment: Examining Procedural Justice Perceptions and Job Seekers' Intentions

Incongruent Skills and Experiences in Online Labor Market.

How to Effectively Display Sponsorship Information: The Influences of External Time Cues and Information Type on Individuals’ Evaluations

Social Media Recruitment: Communication Characteristics and Sought Gratifications

Order Effects and Employment Decisions: Experimental Evidence from a Nationwide Program

Quantifying the Impact of Human Capital, Job History, and Language Factors on Job Seniority with a Large-scale Analysis of Resumes

Examining Applicant Online Recruitment: The Use of Fictitious Websites in Experimental Studies

Temporal Doppler Effect and Future Orientation: Adaptive Function and Moderating Conditions.

Perceived warmth and competence predict callback rates in meta-analyzed North American labor market experiments

The role of temporal focus, dispositional employability, and training on the perceived internal career prospects of talents

Applicant Reactions to Social Media Assessments: Effects of Social Media Type, Social Media Self-Efficacy, and Minority Status

Effects of Using Artificial Intelligence on Interpersonal Perceptions of Job Applicants

Reducing discrimination against job seekers with and without employment gaps

THE IMPORTANCE OF RECRUITMENT IN JOB CHOICE: A DIFFERENT WAY OF LOOKING

Identity and virtuality: The influence of personal profiles on social media on job search

Face-to-face vs. remote digital settings in job assessment interviews: A multilevel hyperscanning protocol for the investigation of interpersonal attunement

Revisit the causal inference between organizational commitment and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis disentangling its sources of inconsistencies.