Some Remarks on the Question of Charge Densities in Stationary-Current-Carrying Conductors

Liana Baroni,Enrico Montanari,Alessandro D. Pesci

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02722838

1998-08-28

Abstract:Recently, some discussions arose as to the definition of charge and the value of the density of charge in stationary-current-carrying conductors. We stress that the problem of charge definition comes from a misunderstanding of the usual definition. We provide some theoretical elements which suggest that positive and negative charge densities are equal in the frame of the positive ions.

Physics Education

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

This paper attempts to solve the problems regarding the definition of charge density in current - conducting bodies and its measured values. Specifically, the paper mainly focuses on the following two aspects:

1. **The correctness of the charge definition**: Recently, some scholars (such as Ivezić) have questioned the common charge definition and proposed a new charge definition. The author of the paper believes that this质疑 stems from a misunderstanding of the commonly - used charge definition and proves through theoretical analysis that the commonly - used charge definition is correct.

2. **The problem of charge density in current - conducting bodies**: The paper discusses whether the positive and negative charge densities are equal in current - conducting bodies. In particular, Ivezić assumes that the positive charge density measured in the ion rest frame is equal to the negative charge density measured in the electron rest frame, which is different from the common view. The author of the paper demonstrates through multi - angle analysis (including thermal motion, Ohm's law, etc.) that the common view that the positive and negative charge densities are equal in the ion rest frame is correct.

### Main arguments and conclusions of the paper

- **Clarification of the charge definition**: The paper emphasizes that the definition of charge should not depend on the velocity of particles, that is, charge is a Lorentz invariant. This is proved by the law of charge conservation (continuity equation):
\[
\frac{\partial \rho}{\partial t}+\nabla\cdot\mathbf{j} = 0
\]
where \(\rho\) is the charge density and \(\mathbf{j}\) is the current density.

- **The equality problem of charge density**: The paper points out that in current - conducting bodies, the positive and negative charge densities should be equal in the ion rest frame. If Ivezić's assumption is adopted, situations inconsistent with experimental results will occur, for example:
- Thermal motion will lead to significant effects;
- Under the action of the same acceleration field, the average distance between particles with the same initial velocity will change;
- Ohm's law no longer holds.

### Conclusion

The paper finally concludes that the non - standard charge definition proposed by Ivezić and the assumption of unequal charge densities are wrong. The commonly - used charge definition and the view that the positive and negative charge densities are equal in the ion rest frame are correct and are consistent with the existing experimental results.

Through these analyses, the paper aims to clarify the disputes regarding the charge definition and charge density in current - conducting bodies and provide a clear theoretical basis for research in related fields.