Scaffolding geospatial epistemic discomfort: a pedagogical framework for cross-disciplinary landscape research

Vincenza FerraraFlor Álvarez-TaboadaGert-Jan BurgersEduardo Corbelle-RicoMiguel CorderoEduardo DiasAnneli EkblomStefanos GeorganosJeff HowarthMaurice de KleijnTommaso La MantiaNiels van ManenGiovanna SalaRafael da Silveira BuenoPhilip VerhagenAnders Wästfelta Department of Human Geography,Stockholm University,Stockholm,Swedenb Department of Archaeology and Ancient History,Uppsala University,Uppsala,Swedenc DRACONES Research Group,Universidad de León,Ponferrada,Spaind Faculty of Humanities,Art and Culture,History,Antiquity,Vrije Universiteit,Amsterdam,The Netherlandse Departamento de Enxeñería Agroforestal,Campus Terra,Universidade de Santiago de Compostela,Lugo,Spainf Instituto de Biodiversidade Agraria e Desenvolvemento Rural,Campus Terra,Universidade de Santiago de Compostela,Lugo,Spaing Spatial Information Laboratory (SPINlab),School of Business and Economics,Vrije Universiteit,Amsterdam,The Netherlandsh Geomatics,Department of Environmental and Life Sciences,Karlstad University,Karlstad,Swedeni Geography,Middlebury College,Middlebury,VT,USAj Spatial Information Laboratory (SPINlab),School of Business and Economics,Vrije Universiteit,Amsterdam and the Netherlands eScience Center,Amsterdam,The Netherlandsk Department of Agricultural,Food and Forest Sciences,University of Palermo,Palermo,Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2024.2333291
2024-03-23
Journal of Geography in Higher Education
Abstract:Current environmental crises call for an integrated knowledge of landscapes and their ecosystems in a broader sense. This article presents a pedagogical framework for cross-disciplinary landscape research at postgraduate level. The framework is grounded in the use of geospatial epistemic discomfort as a creative force to develop and enhance inquiry skills able to cross and merge disciplinary boundaries. Developed within the Erasmus+ KA2 project "CROSSLAND", the pedagogical framework is based on the scaffolding of epistemic discomfort through four key didactic elements: 1) cross-disciplinary group work and open-ended assignment, 2) in-field inquiry as pre-training on space-time, 3) replacement of traditional lectures by student-led seminars, 4) GIS labs centred on the exploration of cross-disciplinary portfolios of geospatial approaches and methods given as worked-out examples. Main results from the evaluation of the framework implementation in a Summer School show how learning cross-disciplinarity happened thanks to a scaffolding that allowed, first and foremost, the socialisation of different conceptualisations of space. While students felt at ease with geospatial epistemic discomfort, we can conclude that spatial cognitive processes are powerful in improving abilities beyond the spatial domain.
geography,education & educational research
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The paper primarily explores a teaching framework for interdisciplinary landscape research aimed at graduate and doctoral students. Its core lies in promoting active learning and the development of interdisciplinary skills through geospatial epistemic discomfort. Specifically, the paper proposes the following points: 1. **Goals of the Teaching Framework**: To cultivate students' interdisciplinary research abilities, enabling them to pose research questions that cross disciplinary boundaries; to deepen their understanding of spatial concepts; and to develop the ability to move from conceptualization to operation. 2. **Teaching Methods**: The framework includes four key teaching elements: - Interdisciplinary team collaboration and open-ended task assignments. - Field inquiry as spatiotemporal pre-training. - Student-led seminars replacing traditional lectures. - Providing a "combination" of interdisciplinary geospatial methods and techniques. 3. **Case Study**: The framework was tested in a one-week summer school that attracted students from diverse backgrounds. The case study area was Santiago de Compostela, Spain, and its surrounding regions. 4. **Evaluation Methods**: Data was collected using phenomenological methods, including focus group discussions at the end of the course and semi-structured questionnaires seven months later, aiming to understand students' learning outcomes and which course elements were most helpful to them. 5. **Learning Outcomes**: Students reported that through this course, they learned how to communicate with colleagues from other disciplines, broadened their thinking about geospatial and landscape analysis, and realized that different spatial concepts can coexist. 6. **Effectiveness of the Course Structure**: Students believed that team project work contributed the most to their learning outcomes. Although they felt frustrated at the beginning, they ultimately gained a great sense of accomplishment. Opinions on student-led seminars varied; some students found these seminars helpful for theoretical learning, while others preferred practical lab work. In summary, the paper introduces an innovative teaching approach aimed at stimulating students' interest in interdisciplinary learning and developing relevant skills by guiding them through geospatial epistemic discomfort. Through fieldwork, teamwork, and student-centered learning activities, the framework successfully enhanced students' abilities in interdisciplinary research.