Scaffolding geospatial epistemic discomfort: a pedagogical framework for cross-disciplinary landscape research
Vincenza FerraraFlor Álvarez-TaboadaGert-Jan BurgersEduardo Corbelle-RicoMiguel CorderoEduardo DiasAnneli EkblomStefanos GeorganosJeff HowarthMaurice de KleijnTommaso La MantiaNiels van ManenGiovanna SalaRafael da Silveira BuenoPhilip VerhagenAnders Wästfelta Department of Human Geography,Stockholm University,Stockholm,Swedenb Department of Archaeology and Ancient History,Uppsala University,Uppsala,Swedenc DRACONES Research Group,Universidad de León,Ponferrada,Spaind Faculty of Humanities,Art and Culture,History,Antiquity,Vrije Universiteit,Amsterdam,The Netherlandse Departamento de Enxeñería Agroforestal,Campus Terra,Universidade de Santiago de Compostela,Lugo,Spainf Instituto de Biodiversidade Agraria e Desenvolvemento Rural,Campus Terra,Universidade de Santiago de Compostela,Lugo,Spaing Spatial Information Laboratory (SPINlab),School of Business and Economics,Vrije Universiteit,Amsterdam,The Netherlandsh Geomatics,Department of Environmental and Life Sciences,Karlstad University,Karlstad,Swedeni Geography,Middlebury College,Middlebury,VT,USAj Spatial Information Laboratory (SPINlab),School of Business and Economics,Vrije Universiteit,Amsterdam and the Netherlands eScience Center,Amsterdam,The Netherlandsk Department of Agricultural,Food and Forest Sciences,University of Palermo,Palermo,Italy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2024.2333291
2024-03-23
Journal of Geography in Higher Education
Abstract:Current environmental crises call for an integrated knowledge of landscapes and their ecosystems in a broader sense. This article presents a pedagogical framework for cross-disciplinary landscape research at postgraduate level. The framework is grounded in the use of geospatial epistemic discomfort as a creative force to develop and enhance inquiry skills able to cross and merge disciplinary boundaries. Developed within the Erasmus+ KA2 project "CROSSLAND", the pedagogical framework is based on the scaffolding of epistemic discomfort through four key didactic elements: 1) cross-disciplinary group work and open-ended assignment, 2) in-field inquiry as pre-training on space-time, 3) replacement of traditional lectures by student-led seminars, 4) GIS labs centred on the exploration of cross-disciplinary portfolios of geospatial approaches and methods given as worked-out examples. Main results from the evaluation of the framework implementation in a Summer School show how learning cross-disciplinarity happened thanks to a scaffolding that allowed, first and foremost, the socialisation of different conceptualisations of space. While students felt at ease with geospatial epistemic discomfort, we can conclude that spatial cognitive processes are powerful in improving abilities beyond the spatial domain.
geography,education & educational research