Assessment of environmental radiological impact in former metallic mines in Extremadura (Spain): A case study

J.L. Figueredo,J. Guillén,A. Salas,J.J. Tejado,J.G. Muñoz-Muñoz,J.M. Caballero
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvrad.2024.107412
IF: 2.655
2024-03-20
Journal of Environmental Radioactivity
Abstract:Metal mining in the Extremadura region was very important in the 19 th and 20 th centuries. However, due to different reasons the great majority of mines ceased operations, leading to plenty of abandoned mining sites, most of them with on-site waste dumps. Although metal extraction is not radioactive per se , it is considered a NORM activity. In this study, three former mining sites, in which Pb-V-Zn-Ag, Pb-Ag, and Pb-Zn were extracted, were selected to assess the radiological impact on the population and the environment. The external γ exposure was estimated by determining the effective dose and elaborating isodose maps of the sites. The presence of the mining sites increased up to 0.41 mSv/y the effective dose over the surrounding background, which is below the reference value of 1 mSv/y. In only one mining site, the uranium and radium activity concentration of waste dumps were higher than the surrounding soil. The soil to plant (wild grass) transfer factors were similar to other reported values without the influence of NORM activities. So, no enhanced transfer of radionuclides was observed. The radiological impact on the environment was assessed by the risk to non-human biota using the tiered approach developed in ERICA Tool. The sum of the risk quotients of all considered radionuclides in the most conservative Tier 1 was below 1. Total dose rates for several terrestrial Reference Animal and Plants (RAPs) were estimated using Tier 3, obtaining values below 40 μGy/h. Therefore, the impact on non-human biota can be considered as negligible.
environmental sciences
What problem does this paper attempt to address?