Atypical features of the Austrian model of criminal law protection of circulation of medical devices

P. Berzin,R. Volynets,O. Frolova
DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2023.80.2.2
2024-01-20
Abstract:The article examines the atypicality of the Austrian model of criminal law protection of the circulation of medical products and medical devices. The authors note that the acts of foreign criminal legislation distinguish types of criminal offenses that encroach on pharmaceutical activity, which to a certain extent coincide with those provided for in the Criminal Code of Ukraine. At the same time, it is the Austrian model of protection of circulation of medical products and medical devices that most successfully, as the analysis of acts of foreign criminal legislation shows, demonstrates the legislator’s approach to the normative and legal regulation of this sphere of circulation. The authors note that there are certain factors that influence the atypicality of the Austrian model, namely: a) the legislative definition of the concept of pharmaceutical products, since the content of this concept “legislatively outlines” the limits of criminal protection and affects the mechanism of ensuring this protection; b) determination of the limits of criminal protection of medical devices depending on the requirements of the Austrian Federal Law on Medical Devices (Bundesgesetz betreffend Medizinprodukte) dated October 28, 2021. The article focuses on the fact that Austrian legislation provides legal protection of medical devices as a mandatory component of pharmaceutical activity despite the fact that the mentioned Austrian Federal Law on Medical Devices does not contain an independent “exhaustive definition” of the concept of medical devices, as is done, for example, in the German Medical Products Act of Austria (Gesetz uber Medizinprodukte) as amended on August 7, 2002. The authors note that the atypicality of the Austrian “model” of criminal protection of medical devices is due to the fact that the Austrian Federal Law on Medical Devices in its § 80 contains provisions on “administrative punishment (Verwaltungsstrafe)” for violation of the established order of circulation of medical products, which (prescriptions ) affect the provision of criminal protection of medical products and its limits. The article focuses on the characteristics of the “administrative penalty (Verwaltungsstrafe)” in the system of Austrian law, which is an independent type of measures of an administrative and legal nature.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?