Abstract:Rainfall-Runoff simulation is the backbone of all hydrological and climate change studies. This study proposes a novel stochastic model for daily rainfall-runoff simulation called Stacked Long Short-Term Memory (SLSTM) relying on machine learning technology. The SLSTM model utilizes only the rainfall-runoff data in its modelling approach and the hydrology system is deemed a blackbox. Conversely, the distributed and physically-based hydrological models, e.g., SWAT (Soil and Water Assessment Tool) preserve the physical aspect of hydrological variables and their inter-relations while taking a wide range of data. The two model types provide specific applications that interest modelers, who can apply them according to their project specification and objectives. However, sparse distribution of point-data may hinder physical models’ performance, which may not be the case in data-driven models. This study proposes a specific SLSTM model and investigates the SLSTM and SWAT models’ data dependency in terms of their spatial distribution. The study was conducted in the two distinct river basins of Samarahan and Trusan, Malaysia, with over 20 years of hydro-climate data. The Trusan basin’s rain gauges are scattered downstream of the basin outlet and Samarahan’s are located around the basin, with one station within each basin’s limits. The SWAT was developed and calibrated following its general modelling approach, however, the SLSTM performance was also tested using data preprocessing with principal component analysis (PCA). Results showed that the SWAT performance for daily streamflow simulation at Samarahan has been superior to that of Trusan. Both the SLSTM and PCA-SLSTM models, however, showed better performance at Trusan with PCA-SLSTM outperforming the SLSTM. This demonstrates that the SWAT model is greatly affected by the spatial distribution of its input data, while data-driven models, irrespective of the spatial distribution of their entry data, can perform well if the data adequacy condition is met. However, considering the structural difference between the two models, each has its specific application in a water resources context. The study of catchments’ response to changes in the hydrology cycle requires a physically-based model like SWAT with proper spatial and temporal distribution of its entry data. However, the study of a specific phenomenon without considering the underlying processes can be done using data-driven models like SLSTM, where improper spatial distribution of data cannot be a restricting factor.

Comparative Performance Assessment of Physical-Based and Data-Driven Machine-Learning Models for Simulating Streamflow: A Case Study in Three Catchments across the US

Comparison and integration of hydrological models and machine learning models in global monthly streamflow simulation

Performance evaluation of ML techniques in hydrologic studies: Comparing streamflow simulated by SWAT, GR4J, and state-of-the-art ML-based models

Can artificial intelligence and data-driven machine learning models match or even replace process-driven hydrologic models for streamflow simulation?: A case study of four watersheds with different hydro-climatic regions across the CONUS

Comparison of Process-Driven SWAT Model and Data-Driven Machine Learning Techniques in Simulating Streamflow: A Case Study in the Fenhe River Basin

Comparing machine learning and deep learning models for probabilistic post-processing of satellite precipitation-driven streamflow simulation

Supplementary Material to "comparing Machine Learning and Deep Learning Models for Probabilistic Post-Processing of Satellite Precipitation-Driven Streamflow Simulation"

A Physical Process and Machine Learning Combined Hydrological Model for Daily Streamflow Simulations of Large Watersheds with Limited Observation Data

Comparison of Long Short Term Memory Networks and the Hydrological Model in Runoff Simulation

Comparing quantile regression forest and mixture density long short-term memory models for probabilistic post-processing of satellite precipitation-driven streamflow simulations

Assessment of monthly runoff simulations based on a physics-informed machine learning framework: The effect of intermediate variables in its construction

A Novel Stacked Long Short-Term Memory Approach of Deep Learning for Streamflow Simulation

Applications and Interpretations of Different Machine Learning Models in Runoff and Sediment Discharge Simulations

Comparison of flood simulation capabilities of a hydrologic model and a machine learning model

Improving Hydrological Modeling with Hybrid Models: A Comparative Study of Different Mechanisms for Coupling Deep Learning Models with Process-based Models

Coupled SWAT and SWT-CNN-LSTM Model to Improve Watershed Streamflow Simulation

Hybrid Data-Driven Models for Hydrological Simulation and Projection on the Catchment Scale

Using a physics-based hydrological model and storm transposition to investigate machine-learning algorithms for streamflow prediction

Impact Assessment of Coupling Mode of Hydrological Model and Machine Learning Model on Runoff Simulation: A Case of Washington

How well do the multi-satellite and atmospheric reanalysis products perform in hydrological modelling

A comparative study of data-driven models for runoff, sediment, and nitrate forecasting