Abstract:Flooding is one of the most common and costly natural hazards at global scale. Flood models are important in supporting flood management. This is a computationally expensive process, due to the high nonlinearity of the equations involved and the complexity of the surface topography. New modelling approaches based on deep learning algorithms have recently emerged for multiple applications.This study aims to investigate the capacity of machine learning to achieve spatio-temporal flood modelling. The combination of spatial and temporal input data to obtain dynamic results of water levels and flows from a machine learning model on multiple domains for applications in flood risk assessments has not been achieved yet. Here, we develop increasingly complex architectures aimed at interpreting the raw input data of precipitation and terrain to generate essential spatio-temporal variables (water level and velocity fields) and derived products (flood maps) by training these based on hydrodynamic simulations.An extensive training dataset is generated by solving the 2D shallow water equations on simplified topographies using Lisflood-FP.As a first task, the machine learning model is trained to reproduce the maximum water depth, using as inputs the precipitation time series and the topographic grid. The models combine the spatial and temporal information through a combination of 1D and 2D convolutional layers, pooling, merging and upscaling. Multiple variations of this generic architecture are trained to determine the best one(s). Overall, the trained models return good results regarding performance indices (mean squared error, mean absolute error and classification accuracy) but fail at predicting the maximum water depths with sufficient precision for practical applications.A major limitation of this approach is the availability of training examples. As a second task, models will be trained to bring the state of the system (spatially distributed water depth and velocity) from one time step to the next, based on the same inputs as previously, generating the full solution equivalent to that of a hydrodynamic solver. The training database becomes much larger as each pair of consecutive time steps constitutes one training example.Assuming that a reliable model can be built and trained, such methodology could be applied to build models that are faster and less computationally demanding than hydrodynamic models. Indeed, in with the synthetic cases shown here, the simulation times of the machine learning models (< seconds) are far shorter than those of the hydrodynamic model (a few minutes at least). These data-driven models could be used for interpolation and forecasting. The potential for extrapolation beyond the range of training datasets will also be investigated (different topography and high intensity precipitation events).&#160;

Comparison of flood simulation capabilities of a hydrologic model and a machine learning model

Evaluation and machine learning improvement of global hydrological model-based flood simulations

Optimizing flood predictions by integrating LSTM and physical-based models with mixed historical and simulated data

Efficient simulation of flood events using machine learning

Assessment of surrogate models for flood inundation: The physics-guided LSG model vs. state-of-the-art machine learning models

Comparison of Long Short Term Memory Networks and the Hydrological Model in Runoff Simulation

Comprehensive comparison of artificial neural networks and long short-term memory networks for rainfall-runoff simulation

Simulation of Urban Flood Process Based on a Hybrid LSTM-SWMM Model

Comparative Performance Assessment of Physical-Based and Data-Driven Machine-Learning Models for Simulating Streamflow: A Case Study in Three Catchments across the US

A Hydrodynamic-Machine Learning Coupled (HMC) Model of Real-Time Urban Flood in a Seasonal River Basin Using Mechanism-Assisted Temporal Cross-Correlation (MTC) for Space Decoupling

Comparison of Process-Driven SWAT Model and Data-Driven Machine Learning Techniques in Simulating Streamflow: A Case Study in the Fenhe River Basin

A deep learning technique-based data-driven model for accurate and rapid flood prediction

Improving Hydrological Modeling with Hybrid Models: A Comparative Study of Different Mechanisms for Coupling Deep Learning Models with Process-based Models

Can artificial intelligence and data-driven machine learning models match or even replace process-driven hydrologic models for streamflow simulation?: A case study of four watersheds with different hydro-climatic regions across the CONUS

A deep-learning-technique-based data-driven model for accurate and rapid flood predictions in temporal and spatial dimensions

Performance evaluation of ML techniques in hydrologic studies: Comparing streamflow simulated by SWAT, GR4J, and state-of-the-art ML-based models

Comparing machine learning and deep learning models for probabilistic post-processing of satellite precipitation-driven streamflow simulation

Enhancing Flood Simulation in Data-Limited Glacial River Basins through Hybrid Modeling and Multi-Source Remote Sensing Data

Hybrid Models Incorporating Bivariate Statistics and Machine Learning Methods for Flash Flood Susceptibility Assessment Based on Remote Sensing Datasets

A hybrid rainfall-runoff model: integrating initial loss and LSTM for improved forecasting

Study of Flood Simulation in Small and Medium-Sized Basins Based on the Liuxihe Model