Abstract:In the late 19th and early 20th centuries, a number of Shakespeare scholars, including Israel Gollancz (1894), H.R.D. Anders (1904), J. Churton Collins (1904), and Gilbert Murray (1914) wrote convincingly of Shakespeare’s debt to classical Greek drama. However, in the century since, most scholars and editors have repeatedly held that Shakespeare was not familiar with Greek drama. In Classical Mythology in Shakespeare (1903), Robert Kilburn Root expressed the opinion on Shakespeare’s ‘lesse Greek’ that presaged this enduring dismissal: “It is at any rate certain that he nowhere alludes to any characters or episodes of Greek drama, that they extended no influence whatsoever on his conception of mythology.” (p. 6) This century-long consensus against Attic dramatic influence was reinforced by A.D. Nutall, who wrote, “that Shakespeare was cut off from Greek poetry and drama is probably a bleak truth that we should accept.” (Nutall, 2004, p.210) Scholars have preferred to maintain that Plutarch or Ovid were Shakespeare’s surrogate literary mediators for the playwright’s adaptations from Greek myth and theatre. Other scholars, however, have questioned these assumptions, including Laurie Maguire, who observed that “invoking Shakespeare’s imagined conversations in the Mermaid tavern is not a methodology likely to convince skeptics that Shakespeare knew Greek drama.” (p. 98) This near-universal rejection of Greek drama as Shakespeare sources have profound philological implications. Indeed, this essay argues that the proscription against recognizing the Attic canon as an influence in Shakespeare has been driven by the belief that Will Shakspere of Stratford had, at most, an education that was Latin-based. The examples show that the real author had to have been exposed to both the Greek language and the Greek dramatists. Evidence for alternative candidates, including Edward de Vere, shows that many were schooled in Greek and that some even collected and supported translations of Greek works. It is my contention that Shakespeare’s dramatic imagination was actually fired by the Greeks, and Shakespeare research has clearly suffered from a century of denial.

The Augustan Plath: "Gulliver" and Other Poems

Greek Philosophy in Poetics of Holderlin and Whitman

Mythology in Modern Literature: An Exploration of Myths and Legends in Sylvia Plath’s Poetry

The Reception of Ancient Greece and Rome in the Victorian Period

[The oeuvre, life history and illness of Sylvia Plath]

Taihu Tatlers: Aesthetic Translation in the China Trade

Thomas Chatterton: four ways of literary terra-forming

An Interview with Professor Stefan Collini

George Eliot’s Literary Legacy: Poetic Perception and Self-Fashioning in the 1870s

A Few Words More about Victorian Women Writers and Germany: George Eliot and Amy Levy

Computational analyses of the topics, sentiments, literariness, creativity and beauty of texts in a large Corpus of English Literature

A Century of Scholarly Neglect: Shakespeare and Greek Drama

A study of satire in Jonathan's swift gulliver's travels

Grice’s Conversational Implicature: A Pragmatics Analysis of Selected Poems of Audre Lorde

Wordsworth, Coleridge, and the "Plan" of the Lyrical Ballads

A LITERARY NOTE - AN UNNOTICED SOURCE FOR THE GREAT GATSBY: THE INFLUENCE OF EDITH WHARTON'S THE GLIMPSES OF THE MOON

The Nostalgic Imagination

[On Sylvia Plath's Personality]

Poetry in the Making

Sylvia Plath's The Bell Jar: A Feministic Reading

The poetic specificity of Gilda's "On the Death of Britain" and the "Hesperica Famina": a pragmatic aspect and a dominant analysis. On the 135th anniversary of the birth of B. I. Yarkho (1889-1942)