Legal Protection For Creditors To Ensure The Fulfillment Of State-Owned Enterprises (Persero)’S Liabilities In The Indonesian Legal System

Heru Pramono
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/plr.vol5.iss2.art1
2023-12-01
Prophetic Law Review
Abstract:The professional management of State-Owned Enterprise Ltd. (Persero) will increase profits from business operations, which will in-turn increase state income. On the other hand, the less professional management of State-Owned Enterprises will lead to a negative impact due to economic losses. To prevent disputes between debtors and creditors when the Limited Liability State-Owned Enterprises (Persero) 1 suffers losses, the state has regulated a resolution through a bankruptcy mechanism to protect the rights of creditors. However, as a matter of fact, there are numerous inconsistent judicial interpretations regarding state capital participation in the State-Owned Enterprise Persero. In addition, disharmony of legal regulations has resulted in different views and understanding of judges regarding the legal position of State-Owned Enterprises in the implementation of bankruptcy and state finances. Based on these inconsistencies and disharmony, this study addresses three essential research questions: first, why is it necessary to apply legal protection to ensure that State-Owned Enterprises (Persero) fulfil its liabilities? Second, what will be the future legal protection for creditors to ensure that State-Owned Enterprises as debtors fulfil their liabilities? This normative legal research used statutory, conceptual, and case study approaches. This research concludes that legal certainty is needed to ensure creditor protection in the bankruptcy mechanism for State-Owned Enterprises. This legal certainty will only be achieved by changing the existing regulations through confirming the legal norm that the capital invested in the State-Owned Enterprise is the financial right of the State-Owned Enterprise Persero and is no longer included in state finances managed under the State Budget. This legal norm is necessary to avoid legal disharmony and inconsistency due to the diverse definitions of capital participation in State-Owned Enterprises (Persero) in bankruptcy decisions. This research initiates reformulation and clarity regarding the meaning of State capital participation in State-Owned Enterprises Persero.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?