Abstract:Abstract This article aims to determine the principles of responsibility for the directors of BUMN (Persero) based on the principles of business judgment rule in the perspective of Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. The research method used in this research is normative legal research. The data used are secondary data in the form of primary and secondary legal materials. The data is then processed and analyzed qualitatively. The results of the research show that the Company Law and the principles it adheres to reflect that the directors are fully responsible for the management of the Company with the protection of the principles of the business judgment rule so that if later errors or negligence of the directors are found that result in losses, the responsibility of the directors is not to the state (public). Instead, it has been transformed into (private) business responsibility based on the business judgment rule. The board of directors' responsibility can be identified by proving whether the directors' actions are honest mistakes or negliglence mistakes. If the losses caused come from actions classified as honest mistakes, the board of directors is released from their personal responsibility. However, if the loss arises from his or her actions, which are negliglence mistakes, each member of the board of directors concerned must be personally responsible. Keywords: Director; BUMN (Persero); Loss; Business Judgment Rule. Abstrak Artikel ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui prinsip tanggung jawab direksi BUMN (Persero) berdasarkan prinsip business judgment rule dalam perspektif Undang-Undang Nomor 40 Tahun 2007 tentang Perseroan Terbatas. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif. Data yang digunakan adalah data sekunder berupa bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Data kemudian diolah dan dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil dari penelitian diketahui bahwa UUPT dan prinsip-prinsip yang dianutnya mencerminkan bahwa direksi bertanggung jawab penuh terhadap pengelolaan Perseroan dengan perlindungan prinsip business judgment rule sehingga apabila di kemudian hari ditemukan kesalahan atau kelalaian direksi yang mengakibatkan kerugian, tanggung jawab direksi bukan kepada negara (publik), melainkan telah bertransformasi menjadi tanggung jawab bisnis (privat) berdasarkan business judgment rule . Untuk mengetahui sejauh mana tanggung jawab direksi, perlu dibuktikan apakah tindakan direksi tersebut merupakan honest mistakes atau negliglence mistakes . Apabila kerugian yang ditimbulkan berasal dari tindakannya yang tergolong honest mistakes , direksi lepas dari tanggung jawabnya secara pribadi. Namun, jika kerugian tersebut berasal dari tindakannya yang merupakan negliglence mistakes , setiap anggota direksi yang bersangkutan harus bertanggung jawab secara pribadi. Kata Kunci: Direksi; BUMN; Kerugian; Business Judgment Rule .

Analysis Of The State Financial Losses To Subsidiaries Of State-Owned Enterprises In Terms Of Business Judgment Rules

Urgency of Regulation of Business Judgment Rule As A Reason For Criminal Deletion In Criminal Acts of Corruption

CORPORATE CRIMINAL LIABILITY RELATED TO THE BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE DOCTRINE

BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE: SEBUAH PRINSIP TANGGUNG JAWAB DIREKSI ATAS KERUGIAN DALAM PENGELOLAAN BUMN (PERSERO)

Can business judgment rule be a justification reason in corruption cases in state-owned enterprises in the form of limited liability companies?

APPLICATION OF THE BUSINESS JUDGMENT RULE DOCTRINE IN INDONESIAN COMPANIES

The Recovery of State Assets Due to Bankruptcy in State-owned Enterprises

Indonesian Regulations Related to State Losses in Persero State-Owned Enterprises Partly Owned by the State

Legal Protection For Creditors To Ensure The Fulfillment Of State-Owned Enterprises (Persero)’S Liabilities In The Indonesian Legal System

Doctrin Business Judgment Rule Analysis as an Effort to Protect the Law of Directors of Limited Liability Companies in Indonesia and the United States

Penerapan Prinsip Business Judgment Rule Terhadap Pertanggungjawaban Perdata Direksi Perseroan

The Business Judgment Rule in a Progressive Legal Perspective: Essence and Implications in Indonesia

Monopoly Analysis of a Limited Liability of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs)

State-Owned Enterprise’s Debt in the State Financial Regime

The Considerations of the Panel of Judges in Rejecting the Business Judgment Rule Principles in Corruption Crime Case Decisions of PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya

Conflict of Law Enforcement by State Institutions over Abuse of Power and Authority: A Case Study of "Former President Director of PT. Pertamina"

The Separated State Property in State-Owned Enterprises

Juridical Analysis Of Actions And Legal Consequences For Corporations Involved In Corruption

Reconstruction of State Economic Losses in Criminal Acts of Corruption in Indonesia

The Scope of the Business Judgment Rule and its Relation to the Fiduciary Duties of Company Directors

Penerapan Doktrin Business Judgment Rule Dalam Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi Karen Agustiawan