Abstract:Orthopaedic Journal of Sports Medicine, Volume 12, Issue 11, November 2024. Background:Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a common treatment for patellar instability. Yet nearly 40% of revisions result from femoral tunnel misplacement. One reason may be the positioning of the C-arm relative to the knee.Purpose:To assess how the C-arm's position affects femoral MPFL placement when the image receptor is positioned either contralateral or ipsilateral to the operated knee.Study Design:Controlled laboratory study.Methods:Ten human cadaveric knee specimens were dissected, and the femoral MPFL insertion site was identified and marked using a 10-mm eyelet. According to the possible clinical scenarios, true lateral radiographs in 2 different C-arm positions were taken. In the first scenario, the image receptor was on the ipsilateral side, being 5 cm away from the knee with the x-ray beam directed from medial to lateral (ML5). In the second scenario, the image receptor was on the contralateral side, being 25 cm away from the knee with the x-ray beam directed from lateral to medial (LM25). In each radiograph, the eyelet position was recorded and the distance (proximal-distal and anterior-posterior) from the optimal radiographic insertion point according to the literature was determined. Differences between the groups were calculated using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and a P value of <.05 was considered significant.Results:The anatomic femoral MPFL insertion in the ML5-position was located a mean of 2.7 ± 2.4 mm proximal and 4.5 ± 5.5 mm anterior to the Schöttle point. This resulted in an absolute distance of 7.2 ± 3.0 mm. In the LM25-position, it was located a mean of –0.7 ± 1.8 mm distal and 3.0 ± 5.3 mm anterior, which resulted in an absolute distance of 5.4 ± 3.2 mm. The ML5 was located more anterior (1.5 ± 2.1 mm) and proximal (3.4 ± 2.4 mm) compared with the LM25 position. Measurements following methods described in the literature significantly differed in both axes in the LM25 view when compared with the ML5 view measurements (P = .005).Conclusion:Compared with the ipsilateral C-arm position (ML5), the contralateral C-arm position (LM25) showed a smaller range with a lower standard deviation in identifying the femoral MPFL approach across all measurement methods.Clinical Relevance:When applying the method according to Schöttle et al to locate the femoral MPFL insertion point, it should be noted that in the proximal-distal orientation, the femoral MPFL insertion point is situated proximal to the Blumensaat line in the contralateral view (LM25). In contrast, when using the ipsilateral view (ML5), the femoral MPFL footprint is positioned just distal to the proximal edge of the medial condyle.

The Radiographic Relationship of the Femoral Head, Inguinal Ligament, and Common Femoral Artery Bifurcation for Optimal Vascular Access

Does the Access Angle Change the Risk of Approach-Related Complications in Minimally Invasive Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion? an MRI Study

Assessment of the Optimal Site of Femoral Artery Puncture and Angiographic Anatomical Study of the Common Femoral Artery

Bridging the gap between neuroimaging and neurosurgery: a case of epidural arteriovenous fistula with an intradural presentation. Illustrative case

An Analysis of the Variations and Clinical Applications of the Lateral Circumflex Femoral Artery.

Impact of hip external rotation and abduction on the anatomic relationship of the femoral artery and the femoral vein

An MRI study demonstrating consistent anatomic relation of central longitudinal artery and associated periosteal vessels with the medial femoral epicondyle and adductor tubercle—A visual landmark method for femoral tunnel placement in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction

The Effect of C-Arm Position on Femoral Tunnel Placement in Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction

Location variance of the great vessels while undergoing side-bend positioning changes during lateral interbody fusion

Anatomical Evaluation of Lumbar Arteries for Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Axillary vs Femoral Arterial Cannulation in Acute Type A Dissection: International Multicenter Data

Effect of Changes in Iliocapsularis Cross-sectional Area on Hip Arthroscopy Outcomes: Clinical and Magnetic Resonance Imaging Follow-up

Arterial access-site complications after use of a vascular closure device related to puncture height

How to Set Working Cannula in Endoscopic-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Morphometric Analysis Based on Computed Tomography

Early postoperative resistance index can predict radiocephalic arteriovenous fistula failure

Deep Circumflex Iliac Artery-vascularized Iliac Bone Graft for Femoral Head Osteonecrosis: Computed Tomography Anatomical Study

Percutaneous Endovascular Reconstruction of the Common Femoral Artery and Its Bifurcation

Plaque Distribution in Common Femoral Artery Bifurcations, Based on Multi-Slice Computed Tomography Assessment

Bilateral absence of the common femoral artery with high-origin and superficial course of the deep femoral artery: a rare case report

Comparison of Frequency of Vascular Complications With Ultrasound-Guided Versus Fluroscopic Roadmap-Guided Femoral Arterial Access in Patients Who Underwent Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

Distribution of Intraplaque Calcification in the Femoral Artery : a Multi-Contrast MRI Study