Percutaneous Endovascular Reconstruction of the Common Femoral Artery and Its Bifurcation

Stephanie Rassam,Raphaël Coscas
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm13113169
IF: 3.9
2024-05-29
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Abstract:Occlusive lesions of the common femoral artery (CFA) and its bifurcation have traditionally been treated with open surgery. Although long-term patency rates after open surgery are excellent, such repairs are associated with substantial local and general morbidity. In recent years, different treatment options have emerged within percutaneous endovascular repair. We hereby present a narrative review on endovascular treatment modalities and a treatment algorithm for endovascular revascularisation of the CFA and its bifurcation. Lesion analysis, access issues, vessel preparation tools, and types of repairs with or without the involvement of the bifurcation are described. Based on current data, an interventional approach can result in high technical success and acceptable mid-term patency rates. Further comparative evidence with open surgery and/or between the different types of endovascular repairs is required to improve the current treatment algorithm.
medicine, general & internal
What problem does this paper attempt to address?
The problem that this paper attempts to solve is that although the traditional open - surgery treatment for occlusive lesions in the common femoral artery (CFA) and its bifurcation has a high long - term patency rate, it is accompanied by significant local and systemic complications. Therefore, the authors explored the possibility of percutaneous endovascular repair (PER) as an alternative. Specifically, the paper aims to: 1. **Evaluate the technical success and mid - term patency rate of PER**: By reviewing the literature, the authors analyzed the technical feasibility and mid - term effects of PER, especially its performance in treating lesions in the CFA and its bifurcation. 2. **Propose a treatment algorithm for PER**: Based on the current data, the authors proposed a treatment process for PER, including lesion analysis, access selection, selection of vascular preparation tools, and specific repair methods. 3. **Compare PER with open surgery**: The paper also discussed the advantages and limitations of PER compared with traditional open surgery, and pointed out that more comparative studies are needed to further optimize the PER treatment strategy. 4. **Focus on specific patient groups**: For some high - risk patients or those with complex lesions, PER may be a better choice. The paper specifically mentioned that for patients with severe complications or who are not suitable for open surgery, PER can be an effective alternative therapy. In summary, the core issue of this paper is to explore the application prospects of PER in the treatment of occlusive lesions in the CFA and its bifurcation, and how to improve its treatment effect by optimizing technical means.