Abstract:Purpose The purpose of this study is to examine the impact of internal and external corporate governance mechanisms on the probability of engaging in tax aggressiveness. Design/methodology/approach This study uses a sample of 52 firms listed on the Tunis stock exchange observed over the 2003–2016 period (The authors had to stop sampling in 2016 because the measurement of tax aggressiveness requires 4 years after the year of study. Therefore, the data on the measurement of tax aggressiveness were collected until 2020). This paper uses the logistic regression technique. Findings The results of the first logistic regression show that ownership structure and the supervision role of the tax authorities are determining factors that explain tax aggressiveness; while, the attributes of the board of directors does not seem to explain the probability of engaging in aggressive tax strategies. To further probe this question, the authors carried out additional analyses that examine the moderating effect of controlling shareholders on the relationship between the attributes of the board and tax aggressiveness. The results of our additional regressions indicate that the effect of these attributes improves in cases of non-presence of a controlling shareholder. This implies that the role that the board of directors can play in controlling management is possibly conditioned by the presence or no of control block holders. Research limitations/implications The major limitation of this study is that it concentrates only on Tunisian listed companies because they are the only companies the financial statements of which are publicly available in Tunisia. Although the sample is relatively small due to the problem of data availability, it appears to be satisfactory given the 15-year sampling period (i.e. from 2003 to 2016). Practical implications The results of the study may help Tunisian regulators create requirements for corporate governance (such as the size of the board of directors and audit committee or the concentration of ownership). Moreover, this study not only focuses on the effect of corporate governance mechanisms on tax aggressiveness but also provides shareholders with information on the governance mechanisms to which they should pay more attention in their desire to obtain more efficient tax results. Social implications The findings are also useful for tax policymakers seeking to identify the circumstances that give rise to an increased risk of tax aggressiveness, as tax aggressive behavior and the resulting non-payment of taxes also have societal implications. In fact, taxes also play an important role in financing the provision of public goods, making corporation tax a matter of public concern. Originality/value The present study differs from others in the existing literature by designing a more precise measure of tax aggressiveness and examining the interaction between two internal governance mechanisms; the presence of a controlling shareholder and the attributes of the board of directors. This study also examines the impact of the control exercised by the tax authorities on the behavior of firms in terms of tax aggressiveness.

How do socially responsible companies engage in tax avoidance practices? Evidence from France

The mediating role of corporate social responsibility on the relationship between governance and tax avoidance: UK common law versus French civil law

The moderating effect of tax risk on the relationship between tax avoidance and firm risk: empirical evidence in the French context

The Role of Corporate Social Responsibility Decoupling on Corporate Tax Avoidance

Tax avoidance, tax management and corporate social responsibility

Does corporate social responsibility affect dividend policy? Empirical evidence in the French context

Does CSR Action Provide Insurance-Like Protection to Tax-Avoiding Firms? Evidence from China

The Curious Case of Corporate Tax Avoidance: Is it Socially Irresponsible?

Financial-tax reporting conformity, tax avoidance and corporate social responsibility

Corporate social responsibility and corporate tax aggressiveness: Evidence of mandatory vs. voluntary regulatory regimes impact

Unearthing hidden agendas: carbon emissions and corporate tax strategies

The impact of internal and external corporate governance mechanisms on tax aggressiveness: evidence from Tunisia

Does Corporate Social Responsibility Expenditure Influence Tax Avoidance? Evidence from Tanzanian Listed Firms

Unaware corporate social responsibility: impact of firm size, motivations and external pressures

The Effect of Corporate Social Responsibility and the Executive Compensation on Implicit Cost of Equity: Evidence from French ESG Data

The moderating effect of women directors on the relationship between corporate social responsibility and corporate tax avoidance? Evidence from Malaysia

Corporate Tax Avoidance and Corporate Social Responsibility Disclosure Readability: Evidence from China

The effect of business ethics and governance score on tax avoidance: a European perspective

Corporate Social Responsibility and other factors affecting Tax Avoidance

Pengaruh Corporate Social Responsibility Terhadap Tax Avoidance

The IFRS adoption, corporate tax avoidance and the moderating effect of family ownership