A Cogitation on the ChatGPT Craze from the Perspective of Psychological Algorithm Aversion and Appreciation
Hao Yu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/prbm.s430936
IF: 3.974
2023-09-14
Psychology Research and Behavior Management
Abstract:Hao Yu Faculty of Education, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an, Shaanxi, People's Republic of China Correspondence: Hao Yu, Email In recent times, ChatGPT has garnered significant interest from the public, sparking a range of reactions that encompass both aversion and appreciation. This paper delves into the paradoxical attitudes of individuals towards ChatGPT, highlighting the simultaneous existence of algorithmic aversion and appreciation. A comprehensive analysis is conducted from the vantage points of psychology and algorithmic decision-making, exploring the underlying causes of these conflicting attitudes from three dimensions: self-performance, task types, and individual factors. Subsequently, strategies to reconcile these opposing psychological stances are proposed, delineated into two categories: flexible coping and inflexible coping. In light of the ongoing advancements in artificial intelligence, this paper posits recommendations for the attitudes and actions that individuals ought to adopt in the face of artificial intelligence. Regardless of whether one exhibits algorithm aversion or appreciation, the paper underscores that coexisting with algorithms is an inescapable reality in the age of artificial intelligence, necessitating the preservation of human advantages. Keywords: ChatGPT, contradictory psychology, algorithm aversion, algorithm appreciation, algorithmic decision-making, artificial intelligence On November 30, 2022, OpenAI, an American company, released a chatbot called ChatGPT, which quickly caught the attention of people worldwide. Subsequently, OpenAI iterated with a new model version called GPT-4, but opinions about it were mixed. 1 Some praised the convenience it brought, 2,3 while others expressed concerns about its potential impact on the existing social order. These discussions even sparked a larger debate on how AI would influence the development of human society. This article starts from the contradictory attitudes of individuals towards AI products like ChatGPT and explores the underlying psychological mechanisms behind the contradictory attitudes of algorithm aversion and algorithm appreciation. Drawing on relevant theories and literature on algorithmic decision-making, it proposes approaches for future AI development to address these contradictory attitudes. ChatGPT is not a completely new entity but rather a new development in the field of artificial intelligence, representing a product of the new era of AI. ChatGPT, which stands for Chat Generative Pre-train Transformer, is a language model based on natural language processing and deep learning techniques. 4 It possesses the ability to process and analyze information and generate responses, going beyond the generation of human-like natural language. Additionally, ChatGPT can be combined with other technologies such as speech, image, and video to generate diverse answers. 5 In practical applications, it enables real-time human-machine interaction, helping individuals clarify their thoughts and feelings, understand their context and situation, and continuously optimize the decision-making process based on individual feedback on the answers. The emergence and development of ChatGPT signify significant progress in the field of human-machine interaction through natural language processing and deep learning technologies. The appearance of ChatGPT means that artificial intelligence can generate natural language like humans, enhancing machine understanding and processing of the complexity of human language. As ChatGPT and its competitors continue to emerge, individuals are increasingly concerned about the impact and potential risks of these technologies. The core of ChatGPT is its algorithm. Individuals' attitudes toward algorithms, especially new algorithms, always exhibit contradictory aspects: algorithm aversion, algorithm appreciation, and even a coexistence of aversion and appreciation. As early as the 1950s, Meehl (1954) pointed out that despite the availability of superior statistical models, doctors still tend to rely on their intuition when making medical decisions. 6 Since the beginning of the 21st century, advanced technologies such as AI have entered the integration and application stage, and the performance of supporting algorithms has continued to improve. 7 However, similar phenomena still exist. Dietvorst et al further noted that even when users see algorithmic predictions outperforming human predictors, they still tend to resist using algorithms. 8 They defined this phenomenon as algorithm aversion. Although Dietvorst et al also emphasized that algorithm aversion occurs when algorithms make errors or fall short, research has found that individuals may still reject using algorithms even when they have not observed any algorithmic errors -Abstract Truncated-
psychology, clinical, multidisciplinary