Abstract:Algorithm aversion is an important and persistent issue that prevents harvesting the benefits of advancements in artificial intelligence. The literature thus far has provided explanations that primarily focus on conscious reflective processes. Here, we supplement this view by taking an unconscious perspective that can be highly informative. Building on theories of implicit prejudice, in a preregistered study, we suggest that people develop an implicit bias (i.e., prejudice) against artificial intelligence (AI) systems, as a different and threatening “species,” the behavior of which is unknown. Like in other contexts of prejudice, we expected people to be guided by this implicit bias but try to override it. This leads to some willingness to rely on algorithmic advice (appreciation), which is reduced as a function of people’s implicit prejudice against the machine. Next, building on the somatic marker hypothesis and the accessibility-diagnosticity perspective, we provide an explanation as to why aversion is ephemeral. As people learn about the performance of an algorithm, they depend less on primal implicit biases when deciding whether to rely on the AI’s advice. Two studies (n1 = 675, n2 = 317) that use the implicit association test consistently support this view. Two additional studies (n3 = 255, n4 = 332) rule out alternative explanations and provide stronger support for our assertions. The findings ultimately suggest that moving the needle between aversion and appreciation depends initially on one’s general unconscious bias against AI because there is insufficient information to override it. They further suggest that in later use stages, this shift depends on accessibility to diagnostic information about the AI’s performance, which reduces the weight given to unconscious prejudice.

A systematic review of algorithm aversion in augmented decision making

What influences algorithmic decision-making? A systematic literature review on algorithm aversion

An Integrative Perspective on Algorithm Aversion and Appreciation in Decision-Making

When the Automated Fire Backfires: the Adoption of Algorithm-based HR Decision-making Could Induce Consumer's Unfavorable Ethicality Inferences of the Company

The ABC of algorithmic aversion: not agent, but benefits and control determine the acceptance of automated decision-making

People Prefer Moral Discretion to Algorithms: Algorithm Aversion Beyond Intransparency

The extent of algorithm aversion in decision-making situations with varying gravity

Algorithm aversion? On the influence of advice accuracy on trust in algorithmic advice

Algorithm Aversion: People Erroneously Avoid Algorithms after Seeing Them Err

Reputational Algorithm Aversion

When Self-Humanization Leads to Algorithm Aversion

Who is the Expert? Reconciling Algorithm Aversion and Algorithm Appreciation in AI-Supported Decision Making

How to overcome algorithm aversion: Learning from mistakes

Task-Dependent Algorithm Aversion

Averse to What: Consumer Aversion to Algorithmic Labels, but not their Outputs?

Overcoming Algorithm Aversion: A Comparison between Process and Outcome Control

Fairness perceptions of algorithmic decision-making: A systematic review of the empirical literature

After Opening the Black Box: Meta-dehumanization Matters in Algorithm Recommendation Aversion

On the (non-) reliance on algorithms—A decision-theoretic account

Prejudiced against the Machine? Implicit Associations and the Transience of Algorithm Aversion

A Simple Explanation Reconciles “Algorithm Aversion” and “Algorithm Appreciation”: Hypotheticals vs. Real Judgments