Abstract:Given a large enough volume of data and precise, meaningful categories, training a statistical model to solve a classification problem is straightforward and has become a standard application of machine learning (ML). If the categories are not precise, but rather fuzzy, as in the case of scientific disciplines, the systematic failures of ML classification can be informative about properties of the underlying categories. Here we classify a large volume of academic publications using only the abstract as information. From the publications that are classified differently by journal categories and ML categories (i.e., misclassified publications, when using the journal assignment as ground truth) we construct a network among disciplines. Analysis of these misclassifications provides insight in two topics at the core of the science of science: (1) Mapping out the interplay of disciplines. We show that this misclassification network is informative about the interplay of academic disciplines and it is similar to, but distinct from, a citation-based map of science, where nodes are scientific disciplines and an edge indicates a strong co-citation count between publications in these disciplines. (2) Analyzing the success of interdisciplinarity. By evaluating the citation patterns of publications, we show that misclassification can be linked to interdisciplinarity and, furthermore, that misclassified articles have different citation frequencies than correctly classified articles: In the highest 10 percent of journals in each discipline, these misclassified articles are on average cited more frequently, while in the rest of the journals they are cited less frequently.

Should Classification Get Undisciplined?

Disciplinary differences and the assessment of scholarship

Classification revisited: a web of knowledge

Classification of Classifications: Species of Library Classifications

Research on the Manual Mapping and Discrepancies of Chinese Library Classification and Library of Congress Classification

Comparison on Disciplinary Classification in the Area of Humanities and Social Science

Classification of the Social Sciences

From the Title Order to the Classified Order: Practices of the Periodicals' Shelving Modes in Peking University Library

A Brief Discussion on the Disciplinary System for Library Science

Classification / Clustering Data of Scientific Literature

Chapter 4. A Thesaural Interface for the Basic Concepts Classification

Research on Automatic Classification for Chinese Bibliography Based on Machine Learning

JEL Classification System

Analyzing Journal Category Assignment Using a Paper-level Classification System: Multidisciplinary Sciences Journals

Machine learning misclassification networks reveal a citation advantage of interdisciplinary publications only in high-impact journals

Macro Comparison of the Chinese Library Classification(5th Edition)and the Classification for Chinese Books(2007 edition)

Mapping Mutable Genres in Structurally Complex Volumes

Analysis on Chinese Classification Research between 2007 and 2011 based on Bibliometrics

Classifications as Linked Open Data. Challenges and Opportunities

Freely faceted classification for Web-based information retrieval

Thoughts on the Disciplinary Status of Library Science and Information Science:Empirical Analysis Based on CSSCI