Abstract:In this article, a large range of unique sources from the collections of the St. Petersburg Central State Archive of Scientific and Technical Documentation is analyzed and studied for the first time. These are the reports of Soviet specialists in the field of technical knowledge on the business trips to Czechoslovakia in the period from the mid-1940s until the end of the 1960s. Their authors were employees of the Leningrad sectoral research institutes. They were technical chemists, shipbuilders, hydraulic engineers, mining engineers, machine builders, etc. The presented materials made it possible to take a fresh look at the issues of the Soviet-Czechoslovak technological transfer, both within the framework of bilateral relations and within the framework of CMEA. A distinctive feature of all the reports was their de-ideologization. These documents did not contain references to the classics of Marxism-Leninism and assurances of the superiority of socialist science over bourgeois, but they reflected a deep sincere interest in foreign technologies and engineering solutions. Noteworthy is the very respectful attitude of Soviet specialists towards their Czech and Slovak colleagues, and at the same time – deep attention to Czechoslovak technical developments. This fact clearly distinguishes the reports of engineers from the reports of their colleagues in the humanities, especially from the institutes of the USSR Academy of Sciences. The latter often wrote such documents from the arrogant position of the “elder brother”, who has a monopoly on the Marxist truth. The Soviet authors of the reports did not separate Soviet technical science from the global context and tried in every possible way to convey the idea of the importance of exchanging experience and scientific and technical information with foreign partners. They looked with some envy at their Czechoslovak colleagues, who, albeit limitedly, had access to Western scientific and technical literature. If we talk about the transfer of knowledge and technology from the standpoint of mutual benefit, then we need to draw a conclusion about its success. Cooperation with the USSR allowed Czechoslovakia to develop a number of new technical areas, such as nuclear power, at the same time, the Soviet side got the opportunity to access promising Czechoslovak technologies in the field of mechanical engineering or polymer chemistry. However, the system of intellectual exchanges, despite the obvious mutual interest of the specialists of the two countries in it, was still fettered by ideological frameworks and party control, and the introduction of certain technical innovations often faced the sluggishness of the planned economy.

“...SCIENTIFIC INSTITUTIONS ARE NOW RESUMING THEIR RELATIONS WITH THE INSTITUTIONS OF OTHER COUNTRIES”. DOCUMENTS OF THE ALL-UNION SOCIETY FOR CULTURAL RELATIONS WITH FOREIGN COUNTRIES ABOUT THE BOOK EXCHANGE IN THE 1940S OF SOVIET EGYPTOLOGISTS WITH THEIR EGYPTIAN COLLEAGUES

Cooperation between the Museum of Sloboda Ukraine and the Ethnology and Local History Section of the Kharkiv Research Department of the History of Ukrainian Culture (1920s)

THE “RUSSIAN COLLECTION” OF THE HARRY RANSOM CENTER FOR THE HUMANITIES AT TEXAS STATE UNIVERSITY AT AUSTIN

Soviet Union in the 1970s – 1980s in the mirror of foreign documentary heritage

Egyptian Communists and the Free Officer Regime in the Mid-1950s: Conflict and Confrontation

THE ALL-RUSSIAN ACADEMIC CONFERENCE “ORIENTAL STUDIES AND FIELD RESEARCH”

Oriental Field Research-2022: the Second All-Russian Academic Conference

Behind the Curtains of the People’s Commissariat for Foreign Affairs in the middle of the 1930s. On the Edition Deutschland und die Sowjetunion 1933–1941. Dokumente aus russischen und deutschen Archiven (2019)

Egypt in U.S. policy in the Middle East in the early 1950s.

International cooperation of the Imperial Russian military historical society

Analysis of Albania's diplomatic relations with the Soviet Union during the years 1948-1959

The First Soviet Delegation to the People’s Republic of China (September — November, 1949)

Discussion about the Soviet collaboration: a View on the problem of domestic and foreign history researches

The development of trade relations between the Republic of Cyprus and the Soviet Union (1960-1963)

The Soviet East European Policy in the Arabic Press on the Eve of the World War II (August — December 1939)

The Instruction for Travelers Sent to China with Respect to Oriental Linguistics, History and Literature by I.J. Schmidt as a Document of Its Epoch

THE CULTURAL COMPONENT OF DIPLOMATIC RECEPTIONS IN THE USSR (1941–1945)

PRESENTATION OF THE COLLECTIVE MONOGRAPH “COMINTERN AND THE EAST: TO THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF THE FOUNDATION OF THE COMINTERN” IN THE INSTITUTE OF ORIENTAL STUDIES, RAS

A Report on Working in the Arkhiv Vneshnei Politiki Rossii

Soviet-Czechoslovak Technological Transfer: from the First Post-War Years to the Prague Spring (on the Base of the Foreign Trips Reports of Soviet Engineers)

V INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “ARCHIVAL BRANCH IN ORIENTAL STUDIES” (INSTITUTE OF ORIENTAL STUDIES OF THE RUSSIAN ACADEMY OF SCIENCES, MOSCOW, NOVEMBER 17–19, 2021)