Cooperation between the Museum of Sloboda Ukraine and the Ethnology and Local History Section of the Kharkiv Research Department of the History of Ukrainian Culture (1920s)

Yuliia Stadnik
DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/nte2023.02.046
2023-06-30
Folk art and ethnology
Abstract:The article investigates the collaboration, at personal, scientific, and public levels, between the Ethnology and Local History Section of the Kharkiv Research Department of the History of Ukrainian Culture and the Museum of Sloboda Ukraine throughout the 1920s. This period saw the development of Ukrainian science under challenging socio-political circumstances. Insufficient financial support, the restructuring of the education and science system, and later, the repression of scholars created an unstable scientific field. At the same time, the cooperation of scholars within ideological and thematic schools of thought intensified. The research determined that the joint activities of the staff of the Ethnology and Local History Section and the Museum of Sloboda Ukraine were based on common research topics, as well as the work of talented scholars, including M. Sumtsov, R. Dankivska, I. Yerofeyev, P. Kovalivskyi and others in full-time positions simultaneously in both institutions. In addition, the museum was considered one of the Department’s scientific and auxiliary institutions. The study found that personal connections within the Section and the Museum led to the formation of a professional circle of scholars who tackled theoretical and practical problems of ethnology and local history. The joint activities resulted in the development of ethnological research programmes used during search expeditions, as well as in the partial solution of the problem of promulgating the results of scientific work – the publication of scholars’ achievements in the Museum’s editions of and the Department’s collections. The department also trained a younger generation of scholars who engaged in professional activities in the museum industry. Joint efforts of staff of the Department and the Museum were instrumental in carrying out successful cultural and educational work. From 1925 to 1927, a series of lectures on the history and culture of Ukraine was organized. As a result of mutual assistance, the Ethnological and Local History Section of the Kharkiv Research Department of the History of Ukrainian Culture and the Museum of Sloboda Ukraine became centres of ethnological and local history studies in 1920s Kharkivshchyna.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?