Abstract:: For a long time, China’s grassroots mass self-governance organizations, represented by urban community residents’ committees and rural villagers’ committees, as the important main body of social governance activities, have to a certain extent deviated from their functional “self-governance” function due to the “administrative” tendency in their institutional inertia. As modern social governance attaches greater importance to multi-factor participation and multi-dimensional cooperation in governance activities, the concept of governance that synergizes “self-governance and shared governance” has been given high priority in the governance of China's urban and rural communities, and has become a key element in the “common building, common governance and shared sharing” social governance system and governance system of the times, which is highly characteristic of socialism with Chinese characteristics. The concept of “self-governance and shared governance” has been highly valued in the governance of urban and rural communities in China, and has been embodied in the modernization of the social governance system and governance capacity, which is very characteristic of the socialist era with Chinese characteristics. In this process, the Party’s leadership has been consistently applied throughout the entire process and in all aspects of grassroots governance; the political function of community Party organizations has been continuously strengthened; the leading role of grassroots Party organizations and the pioneering and exemplary role of Party members have been fully brought into play, leading to the high-quality development of community governance; democratic self-governance of the grassroots in the community has been effectively promoted, and grass-roots practice of people’s democracy in the entire process has been perfected; importance has been attached to fostering the professional qualities of community workers, and to upgrading the professional qualities of community leaders represented by neighborhood and village committees. The way to develop and improve China’s practice of community governance in the new era is paying attention to fostering the professional qualifications of community workers and improving the self-governance capacity of grass-roots mass self-governance organizations represented by neighborhood committees and village committees.

Research on the Path of Improving the Efficiency of Urban Community Governance from the Perspective of Collaborative Governance: A Case Study of Daqing City, China

The Evolution and Direction of Community Governance in China's Danwei Community:A Case Study of Maofangnan Community,Beijing

Research on Innovative Paths of Grassroots Social Governance in China Based on Collaborative Governance Theory: A Case Study of N City in China

Community Governance in Transitional Urban China

Study on How to Improve the Quality and Efficiency of the Community Affairs in Xi 'an

Exploring the Path of Modernization of Urban Community Governance

The collective action dilemma and its solution in the governance of urban community public space—an empirical analysis from Tianjin

Collaborative Governance for Participatory Regeneration Practices in Old Residential Communities within the Chinese Context: Cases from Beijing

Innovation of Contemporary Chinese Urban Community Governance under the Perspective of Social Capital: Participation of Multiple Subjects Based on Community Proposals

Community Governance Reform in Urban China: A Case Study of the Yantian Model in Shenzhen

Research on International Community Governance——Taking Chaoyang District in Beijing As an Example

Community Renewal under Multi-Stakeholder Co-Governance: A Case Study of Shanghai's Inner City

Led by the Party Building: The Construction of Urban and Rural Community Governance System Under the Concept of Self-governance and Co-governance

Community Forum:A Non-equilibrium Game——Taking Three Cities Survey in Yangtze River Delta Region for Example

How Does Community Leadership Contribute to Rural Environmental Governance? Evidence from Shanghai Villages

A Summary of Social Work Intervention Residents' Participation in Community Governance

Sustainable Urban Community Development: A Case Study from the Perspective of Self-Governance and Public Participation

Who Can Represent Us? A Case Study on Community Governance

Achieving Neighborhood-Level Collaborative Governance through Participatory Regeneration: Cases of Three Residential Heritage Neighborhoods in Shanghai

The Direct Election of the Urban Residents Committee and the Urban Grassroots Governance

Research on the Path of Community Emotional Governance of “Village to Residence”