Abstract:Abstract: The effects of asymmetric information are often difficult to detect empirically, such as in insurance settings (Chiappori, Jullien, Salanie and Salanie, 2006). We show that allowing for the possibility of referencedependent preferences can assist with this challenge. Using detailed auto insurance claims data and adopting the methodology of Allen, DeChow, Pope and Wu (2017) which studies reference-dependence in marathon finishing times, we show that policyholders exaggerate their damage claims in a manner consistent with referencedependent moral hazard. Consistent with our theoretical model of reference-dependent claims, we find stronger reference-dependent behavior among policyholders with higher premium levels and low risk policyholders. Also consistent with the model, policyholders are more reference-dependent in their first claims than in subsequent claims, and in the second half of the coverage year compared to the first half. The detected reference point is the amount of the original premium paid in other words, in claiming their accident damages, policyholders seek to claim back the original price of their insurance. We do not find robust patterns in the concentration of insurance claims at round number percentages greater than or less than the full premium amount, such as 90% or 110%, nor at round number nominal amounts. This implies that the unnatural claim behavior is motivated significantly by loss aversion regarding the premium paid rather than merely wanting to increase one’s claims more generally. Since damage claims can only be this precisely manipulated by the policy holder after an accident, the findings can be attributed primarily to ex-post moral hazard but not adverse selection or ex-ante moral hazard. Furthermore, the pattern exists only for individually-held policies but not corporate-held policies, which is consistent with a reference point in individual utility. Our study illustrates the potential of behavioral economics frameworks in assisting with identification challenges for classical economic problems.

The Impact of Regulation on Customer Satisfaction: Evidence from the US Auto Insurance Industry

Deregulation, competition, and consumer choice of insurer: Evidence from liberalization reform in China’s automobile insurance market

Exploring Industry-Level Fairness of Auto Insurance Premiums by Statistical Modeling of Automobile Rate and Classification Data

A Study on Effects of Perceived Service Quality of Individual Automobile Insurance Business on Customer Satisfaction:With special reference of China Life Property & Casualty Insurance Company

Effects of Monitoring Technology on the Insurance Market

On payday lending: Identifying effective regulation measures

Analyzing the Influence of Telematics-Based Pricing Strategies on Traditional Rating Factors in Auto Insurance Rate Regulation

Insurtech, sensor data, and changes in customers' coverage choices: Evidence from usage‐based automobile insurance

Analysis of Compensation System Preferences: Limitations of the Current Insurance System and Proposals for Improvement

THE IMPACT OF CLAIM EXPENSES, UNDERWRITING RISK, PROFITABILITY, COMPANY SIZE AND RETENTION RATIO ON SOLVENCY OF INSURANCE INDUSTRY

Exaggerating to Break-Even: Reference-Dependent Moral Hazard in Auto Insurance Claims

Regret in health insurance post‐purchase behavior

Measuring and Mitigating Biases in Motor Insurance Pricing

Information Asymmetry, Ex Ante Moral Hazard, and Uninsurable Risk in Liability Coverage: Evidence from China's Automobile Insurance Market

Impact of claim settlement procedure of health insurance companies on customer satisfaction during the pandemic: A case of third-party administrators

The effects of competition on premiums: using United Healthcare's 2015 entry into Affordable Care Act's marketplaces as an instrumental variable

Understanding the Paradox of Insurance Demand: Evi-dence from China’s Auto Insurance Market

Impact of Hofstede’s cultural dimensions on insurance demand

Customer Price Sensitivities in Competitive Automobile Insurance Markets

Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, corporate reputation, and firms’ market value: Evidence from the automobile industry