Abstract:This article examines how governments can regulate the values of social media companies that themselves regulate disinformation spread on their own platforms. We use 'disinformation' to refer to motivated faking of news. We examine the effects that disinformation initiatives (many based on automated decision-making systems using Artificial Intelligence [AI] to cope with the scale of content being shared) have on freedom of expression, media pluralism and the exercise of democracy, from the wider lens of tackling illegal content online and concerns to request proactive (automated) measures of online intermediaries. We particularly focus on the responses of the member states and institutions of the European Union. In Section 1, we argue that the apparent significance of the threat has led many governments to legislate despite this lack of evidence, with over 40 national laws to combat disinformation chronicled by March 2019. Which types of regulation are proposed, which actors are targeted, and who is making these regulations? Regulating fake news should not fall solely on national governments or supranational bodies like the European Union. Neither should the companies be responsible for regulating themselves. Instead, we favour co-regulation. Co-regulation means that the companies develop – individually or collectively – mechanisms to regulate their own users, which in turn must be approved by democratically legitimate state regulators or legislatures, who also monitor their effectiveness. In Section 2, we explain the current EU use of Codes of Conduct. In Section 3, we then explain the relatively novel idea that social media content regulation, and specifically disinformation, can be dealt with by deploying AI at massive scale. It is necessary to deal with this technological issue in order to explain the wider content of co-regulatory policy options, which we explain and for which we argue in Section 4. In Section 5 we explain what this means for technology regulation generally, and the socio-economic calculus in this policy field.

Small‐State Influence in EU Security Governance: Unveiling Latvian Lobbying Against Disinformation

Regulating Disinformation and Big Tech in the EU: A Research Agenda on the Institutional Strategies, Public Spheres and Analytical Challenges

Countering Disinformation on Social Media Platforms: Developments in the EU and Poland

Small State Status-Seeking: Lithuania’s Foreign Policy Status Aspirations

Media and Journalism Research in Small European Countries

STRATEGIC COMMUNICATION PROCESS IN THE EUROPEAN UNION

How do small island states maximize influence? Creole diplomacy and the smart state foreign policy of the Seychelles

Institutional Counter-disinformation Strategies in a Networked Democracy

Disinformation and Propaganda – Impact on the Functioning of the Rule of Law in the EU and its Member States

Beyond online disinformation: assessing national information resilience in four European countries

Exploring the dynamics of policy change in EU security and defence: policy entrepreneurs behind the Strategic Compass

Agenda‐setting under pressure: Does domestic politics influence the European Commission?

A Few Observations About State-Centric Online Propaganda

Influence beyond formal powers: The parliamentarisation of European Union security policy

Platform values and democratic elections: How can the law regulate digital disinformation?

Reverse-Engineering of Disinformation Campaigns During the War in Ukraine

Branding a small state as an innovation business partner

EU public diplomacy in the United States: socio-political challenges & EU delegation agency

The Political Power of Platforms: How Current Attempts to Regulate Misinformation Amplify Opinion Power

BEYOND PERFORMATIVE TRANSPARENCY: LESSONS LEARNED FROM THE EU CODE OF PRACTICE ON DISINFORMATION

Putting collective intelligence to the enforcement of the Digital Services Act