Abstract:Parameters in climate models are usually calibrated manually, exploiting only small subsets of the available data. This precludes both optimal calibration and quantification of uncertainties. Traditional Bayesian calibration methods that allow uncertainty quantification are too expensive for climate models; they are also not robust in the presence of internal climate variability. For example, Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) methods typically require model runs and are sensitive to internal variability noise, rendering them infeasible for climate models. Here we demonstrate an approach to model calibration and uncertainty quantification that requires only model runs and can accommodate internal climate variability. The approach consists of three stages: (a) a calibration stage uses variants of ensemble Kalman inversion to calibrate a model by minimizing mismatches between model and data statistics; (b) an emulation stage emulates the parameter‐to‐data map with Gaussian processes (GP), using the model runs in the calibration stage for training; (c) a sampling stage approximates the Bayesian posterior distributions by sampling the GP emulator with MCMC. We demonstrate the feasibility and computational efficiency of this calibrate‐emulate‐sample (CES) approach in a perfect‐model setting. Using an idealized general circulation model, we estimate parameters in a simple convection scheme from synthetic data generated with the model. The CES approach generates probability distributions of the parameters that are good approximations of the Bayesian posteriors, at a fraction of the computational cost usually required to obtain them. Sampling from this approximate posterior allows the generation of climate predictions with quantified parametric uncertainties. Calibrating climate models with available data and quantifying their uncertainties are essential to make climate predictions accurate and actionable. A primary source of uncertainties in climate models comes from representation of small‐scale processes such as moist convection. Parameters in convection schemes and other parameterizations are usually calibrated by hand, using only a small fraction of data that are available. As a result, the calibration process may miss information about the small‐scale processes in question. This paper presents a proof‐of‐concept, in an idealized setting, of how parameters in climate models can be calibrated using a substantial fraction of the available data, and how uncertainties in the parameters can be quantified. We employ a new algorithm, called calibrate‐emulate‐sample (CES), which makes such calibration and uncertainty quantification feasible for computationally expensive climate models. CES reduces the hundreds of thousands of model runs usually required to quantify uncertainties in computer models to hundreds, thereby achieving about a factor 1,000 speedup. It leads to more robust calibration and uncertainty quantification in the presence of noise arising from chaotic variability of the climate system. We show how uncertainties in climate model parameters can be translated into quantified uncertainties of climate predictions through ensemble integrations. We use time averaged climate statistics to calibrate convective parameters and quantify their uncertainties We demonstrate use of the calibrate‐emulate‐sample algorithm to provide efficient calibration and uncertainty quantification Parametric uncertainty in climate predictions is quantified by sampling from the learnt convective parameter distribution We use time averaged climate statistics to calibrate convective parameters and quantify their uncertainties We demonstrate use of the calibrate‐emulate‐sample algorithm to provide efficient calibration and uncertainty quantification Parametric uncertainty in climate predictions is quantified by sampling from the learnt convective parameter distribution

Tuning Earth System Models Without Integrating to Statistical Equilibrium

Earth System Modeling 2.0: A Blueprint for Models That Learn From Observations and Targeted High-Resolution Simulations

Multicycle Parameter Estimations in Coupled Earth System Models Based on Multiscale Sensitivity Responses in the Context of Low-Order Models

Earth System Model Parameter Adjustment Using a Green's Functions Approach

Targeted calibration to adjust stability biases in non-differentiable complex system models

Differentiable Programming for Earth System Modeling

How parameter specification of an Earth system model of intermediate complexity influences its climate simulations

A Non‐Intrusive Machine Learning Framework for Debiasing Long‐Time Coarse Resolution Climate Simulations and Quantifying Rare Events Statistics

Reducing Numerical Diffusion in Dynamical Coupling Between Atmosphere and Ocean in Community Earth System Model Version 1.2.1

A non-intrusive machine learning framework for debiasing long-time coarse resolution climate simulations and quantifying rare events statistics

Multivariate Estimations of Equilibrium Climate Sensitivity from Short Transient Warming Simulations

Emergent constraints for the climate system as effective parameters of bulk differential equations

Modeling Past Hothouse Climates as a Means for Assessing Earth System Models and Improving the Understanding of Warm Climates

Parameter estimation for ocean background vertical diffusivity coefficients in the Community Earth System Model (v1.2.1) and its impact on El Niño–Southern Oscillation forecasts

Calibration and Uncertainty Quantification of Convective Parameters in an Idealized GCM

DiffESM: Conditional Emulation of Temperature and Precipitation in Earth System Models With 3D Diffusion Models

A Drift-Free Decadal Climate Prediction System for the Community Earth System Model

Estimating Uncertainty in Simulated ENSO Statistics

Ensemble-Based Experimental Design for Targeting Data Acquisition to Inform Climate Models

Incorporating Spatial Variations in Parameters for Improvements of an Evapotranspiration Model